@alphaanomics Ye in Ukraine conflict had Russia had balls and technology and could carry out a campaign like USAF/IAF the conflict would’ve been over and as for IRAN , their underground networks and geography aswell as political intention to burn the entire ME played a big part
@ShiroBarks@singhshwetabh71 So it’s an Adani product which was modified based on the Israeli version ? How different is it from DRDO’s product in terms of R&D knowledge and IP ownership?
@goongoblin13763 Russia is not facing NATO, most damages are by Ukrainian ingenuity, had they faced NATO going by current performance I don’t think it goes well for Russia unless they go for nuclear options right of the bar
@ShiroBarks@sidhant Can’t navy expand its airwing roles ? costal airbases maybe A&N islands can be a combo of AF and navy , that way atleast the fighter requirement will increase, TEDBF won’t be successful with 70 something fighter requirement
Delhi | When asked about the status of the Project 75 (India) and by when the contract is expected to be signed, Chief of the Naval Staff (CNS) Admiral Dinesh K Tripathi, in an interview with ANI, says, "...Project-75(I) is a strategically important programme aimed at progressively building indigenous capability in the design, development, and manufacture of advanced conventional submarines in India under the Strategic Partnership model. P-75(I) project for six next-generation conventional submarines equipped with Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) is being pursued with complete Transfer of Technology and Design Transfer... Considering the timelines involved, the first submarine is expected to be inducted by 2033, followed by the delivery of one submarine every year until 2038... P-75(I) is as much about strategic capability as it is about submarines."
(file pic)
@Vimaan29@sriramthg 24/7 comparing our mil to theirs a 4T econ to their 20T econ , to deter them it obvious we need to take a page out of their learninga and develop a rocket force for A2AD as well as development of a competitive AF
@Vimaan29@sriramthg Why is he acting g like China doesn’t have an extensive service economy catering to this work as well , they have a competitive delivery industry
@celerong6900@SchrdingersDbag@ParrotBeaker Can be very much be funded by them , just like CCP funded anti American influencers(Hasan) and projects , calls for dismantling airforce and replace it with rocket force
@Prakhar81420407 Idk why people are doing gaga over Tejas for export market , mk1A is yet to join our force , mk2 nowhere to be seen , they are doing screwdrivergiri or rather MKIfication on much deeper scale for their Gripen
@AjayshreeSamby3@solar_ind_group Wish army agreed to develop long range deep strike capability of these , would’ve saved us from unnecessary imports and would’ve been a huge export success
@Akshay_VAK@calm_sutra It would be better to develop true sovereign capability and sell to those rich EU nations for their long range deep strike capability as well as to Asian nations specifically the wealthy ones like Japan , than to solely rely on one trick pony , just look at S Korean options