@StatisticUrban Twitter is not real life, Ossoff isn't a household name (AOC has been one since 2019)
I think you're going to be surprised if Ossoff gets the nomination and his popularity goes down when nationwide attacks are focused on him (AOC has already been battle-tested on these attacks!)
@jonathansmucker I've lived in the Philly suburbs and moderation isn't even how you win them over, lmao
I get so angry when people act like his silly strategy had any merit, Chuck Schumer should not lead Democrats in 2027
@AustinHoney30 It is the year 2080. The Democratic nominee of Kansas mentions Sam Brownback. The young to middle aged adults only know of the mythical monster they were taught in school as Sam Brownback, whose screams destroy public schooling. They all vote for the Democratic nominee.
I do think Chuck Schumer beats Chris Van Hollen for Senate leadership
I also thought the Mississippi Senate race was safe R but still supported Scott Colom because what if I was wrong in these times
I support Chris Van Hollen because what if I'm wrong in these times
@AnthonyMEmerson His history is crazy (positive), dropped out of Yale to keep Alaska Dems from falling into despair
He won a "safe GOP" Alaska state House district to keeping Democrats at the minimum of seats they need to keep institutional support for the party.
I already really like this guy
@mndemsoc I feel like it's the other way around.
Parties *punish* most members for rebelling openly, you have to be in a special position (Like Van Hollen is) to get away with it
Private vote means you can pick your choice without the risk of getting bad committee assignments
@bdquinn It's going to be interesting when all the moderates/centrists here who assume Colom is an ultra moderate realize that he's *very* populist, with policies even I think are way too far
Will he annoy leftists more, or if he's annoy elitism centrists more? We'll see!
@ZaidJilani Progressives are willing to do actual compromise
We can do 50/50 deals; we got tired of the 95/5 deals we're used to getting and told we need to love the scraps
@EricMGarcia To put it as nicely as possible, Chris Van Hollen is able to compromise with the left, we're used to Liberals who get mad when we only compromise 90% to their 5%, there is the expecratiob we offer 95%
Chris Van Hollen can do a 50%/50% compromise with us, fantastic!
@AnthonyMEmerson Thune is the Republican Senate leader because it's a private vote
The big "risk" here is consequences from the establishment for not being sufficiently loyal, which don't exist with a private vote
@Shadowcoder203@MaceAhWindu It's the other way around.
Because it's a private vote, you can oppose existing leadership without consequences
This is literally why Thune is the Republican Senate leader, they'd get a MAGA leader if the vote was public information
@MaceAhWindu Correct
Whereas Jeffries knows exactly who to punish when they defy him, Schumer doesn't, even the ones who say they will *could* just be saying it to appeal to their constituents
@polisciqueenn I swear that they accidently swapped the candidates, the "Democratic" candidate is a hardcore traditional Republican and the "Republican" candidate is an ultra woke Democrat.
"Yay Scott Colom won"
"The devout southern Baptist centrist Democrat tough-on-crime prosecutor who's pro-ICE, pro-2A, personally pro-life, anti-DSA, anti-transing kids, anti-transwomen in girls sports, and as socially right-wing as Susan Collins or Lisa Murkowski?"
"Wait what?"
@nikicaga She's not wrong!
A lot of support for the farther left of the Democratic party is people (even hardcore Resist Libs) tired of how Democrats enable Republicans into winning, and leftists gain victories because they're the "do something" option, we need to keep their trust first.