Edward Snowden said it the best:
"When you say 'I don't care about the right to privacy because I have nothing to hide,' that's no different than saying 'I don't care about freedom of speech because I have nothing to say.'"
"Simply because you are following the law, doesn't mean that you'll be exempt from governmental interference in your private life."
@jacekviews@sacredbritannia It’s not about the kids having access to social media. It’s about making every adult give their biometric data or a copy of their passport/ driving licence to third party providers. Which will then get hacked and leak all that data
@TheThomDavid Surely for YouTube accounts, it should matter how long the account has been active. I made my account in 2006 so would be at least 20 years old anyway
@YaVtar47@jaynemesis@CapelliPj Never avoided, gave the reason I’m against the ban. To put everyone against it in the category of pedos shown how small brained you have to be
@TrisOsborneMP By forcing everyone over 16 to give third parties their biometric data or a copy of their passport/ driving licence. Such a win for the hackers of the world
@AliceMLabour Did the survey tell them how it would be implemented ? Giving third parties access to everyone over 16’s biometric data or a copy of their passports/ driving licenses?
@YaVtar47@jaynemesis@CapelliPj And there it is, the retarded answer to wanting mass surveillance. Not wanting to hand a third party my biometric data or a copy of my passport/ driving licence means I must be a pedo. Very good
@FreyaWoods8 To think that it’s to actually protect kids is quite worrying. So the only way to protect kids is to have every single adult give a third party their biometric data or a copy of their passport/ driving licence.
@Arbi1er@FreyaWoods8@GordonFbpe Or soon to be to access government services. Then will be to access banking. So it won’t be mandatory unless you want to actually live
@powellBFC93@dazdrive No issue with it so nothing to hide. So post your full address and bank details since you are so fine with it. Nothing to hide mind
@shannoncbutler_@GuidoBennett That is the worrying thing with so many people thinking this ban is a good thing. You don’t understand what it actually means. The front is that it protects kids but it actually forces everyone over 16 to give third parties our personal biometric data or a copy of our passports
@SamCKx There are ways to do this without forcing every single person over 16 to give third parties access to our biometric data or a copy of our passports/ driving licences
@jaynemesis@CapelliPj So access to state owned news outlets like the BBC. Perfect. That will give the truth about things then and not brainwash them at all
@krackville@Nigel_Farage Utter bollocks. To say that shows you are a retard of the highest order that can’t think for themselves. So to not want third parties to have your biometric data or a copy of your passport/ driving licence means you are a pedo. Aye, very good.
@jaynemesis@CapelliPj Yeah regulate it like North Korea so that we only see what we are allowed to see. How dare we think for ourselves and have opposing opinions
@laurennUTD No good giving third parties your biometric data or a copy of your passport/ driving licence. To then have them get hacked and give all that data to the hackers to sell
@Miss_Snuffy Not worrying for some adults, it’s worrying for all adults. Having to give a third party your biometric data or a copy of your passport/ driving licence. Which they then hold onto to train their AI models and then get hacked, taking all that data