@BlaiseKood51790@libdunkmedia@AndrewKolvet Being one of the greatest pitchers ever comes with privileges. Dude could have drawn a penis on his hat and MLB would’ve sold a copy in its online store.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga The birthright citizenship was a codification of existing law. It wasn’t smuggled through or pork. You’re very emotional about a topic that you’re woefully ill-informed about.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga First, the debates specifically addressed birthright citizenship and clarified that it was intentional. Second, with the canons of statutory construction, the legislative history is only generally relevant when there is an ambiguity in the text.
Dunning Kruger??
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga I went to school with John Sauer and took the bar with him. He’s one of the most brilliant men I’ve ever met - a veritable genius. And when Sotomayor asked him if the Trump Admin was seeking to overturn it, he said “no.”
I guess that makes you the most brilliant man I’ve met
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga “[T]he policy’s existence solely depends on a false interpretation of our [C]onstitution.”
This is a perfect opportunity for clarification. Please explain what you meant by the foregoing. And be sure to source that shit.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga I could be wrong but didn’t this whole thing kick off because you - a non-lawyer - referred to an amendment as “policy” and said SCOTUS offered a “a false interpretation” of the 14th?
That you believe we stand on equal footing is hilariously embarrassing for you.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga Lil bro, you’re talking about policy and an “obviously false interpretation” of the 14th when it was literally written that way and interpreted by Wong Kim Ark. You’ve always been a dummy and you’ll always be a dummy.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga I’ll make this simple for you:
If I’m the dentist in this ill-conceived analogy, then who are you?
Also, constitutional issues pervade every area of the law. And there aren’t actual constitutional law experts aside from professors.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga My clients hire me - in part - because of my integrity. If some bad actors on the internet want to come after me, so be it. If integrity was cheap, everyone would have it.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga I put my name behind my opinions because I’m not a coward. But I’m not surprised that a faceless troll finds that perplexing.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga Putting aside the fact that I’m not “[a] lawyer in real estate law,” that’s a dog shit analogy since dentists aren’t MDs.
@GodListens777@japan_nobunaga Lil bro, you’re talking about policy and an “obviously false interpretation” of the 14th when it was literally written that way and interpreted by Wong Kim Ark. You’ve always been a dummy and you’ll always be a dummy.