It’s not enough to be against trannies, You have to be against women’s rights, too. It’s not enough to be against blue-haired feminism, You have to be against women being “educated.” -NJF
I’m still amazed by Nick Fuentes’ extemporaneous speaking ability. He can talk for hours on multiple topics, clearly and without a script, never stumbling over his words or using verbal crutches like “um” or “uh.” I can’t think of anyone else with that level of talent.
No homo.
Women openly admit that they don’t care about the facts of a case. All they care about is how it makes them feel. This is why they shouldn’t be allowed to vote or sit on juries.
If you changed the names and locations in the Cornell case and released it as a smut novel, one hundred million women in America would have it on their kindle btw
@new2dsxlgroyper 5 percent is a pipe dream LOL maybe in 1985.
I’ve never met a female over the age of 16 who hadn’t had at least 5-10 dicks in her holes.
Get real. Stop the fantasy.
Nick Fuentes says defending the Cornell 7 is SOCIAL SUlClDE. 💯
“I’m one of the few that can really say this. Somebody needs to say it. You can’t fire me, you can’t social suicide me. What are you gonna do, come to my house? The last guy that did that is in hell.” 💀
The picture emerging of this girl is a quirk chungus, derpy hicklib who, based on her morphology, has a rather masculine disposition.
It's probably because of said disposition that she misread female social dynamics and expected there would be no "slut shaming" from the sisterhood if she did something sexually adventurous like an orgy.
The fact that she thought the men involved were gay/bi was added lib status, which as a pride "ally" she must have assumed would especially protect her from social shame – when she first noticed people were speaking negatively of the act, she text a friend words to the effect that this was part of the sexual liberation movement and "is going to become more common"
The timeline then seems clear: she was disinvited from a Halloween party because of the reputation she earned as a slut, which she then realised was a view not confined to bigoted men. When she read a comment of someone saying she was raped, she must have immediately clocked this as a possible out to absolve her of accountability and regain her social status. In her own account, she had never conceived of it in this way until she read it from someone else.
At that point, members of the sisterhood encouraged her suggestions that she was not actually responsible for anything.
"Slut shaming" still exists among sexuall liberated women, but it is at odds with their professed beliefs about sexuality. Women are expected to pick up on this nuance and push for as much female power as possible while also enforcing shaming to discourage any individual lowering female sexual market value through extreme promiscuity.
But, the sisterhood has also built an out, and now any woman can just withdraw consent reotrospectively, undo the wrong, and receive an even greater status as a victim.
Nick Fuentes says that the Cornell "r*ре" victim is really just a HOE 😳
“Everyone who defended this idiot is going to look like an absolute JOKE... In 2026 you’re still believing women?"
"Too male, too pale, and too stale"
This is who was just selected to be the New York special prosecutor for the "Cornell 7" situation
I'm sure she'll be totally fair