Why would anyone want to debate Candace Owens?
She hasn’t declared anyone guilty, except possibly Israel. Do people want to argue that some of the leads she pursued went nowhere or were a waste of time?
Imagine telling a detective that half the leads he followed were stupid and pointless. He’d say, “Yeah, that’s the nature of an investigation.”
Nearly everything Candace says is framed as a question, yet for some reason, those questions deeply bother certain people.
Stand with Candace. America Only.
“Can I have one thing?”
Yes, Erika. You already had it.
You put Charlie’s blood-stained microphone in a glass case and charged people $10,000 a plate to stare at it at Mar-a-Lago.
@HolyFireLuna Yet there she is, not a care in the world that she might be putting herself in harms way and not a care about her children, it's all about💰💰💰💰💰
🚨 CANDACE OWENS JUST WENT NUCLEAR ON ERIKA KIRK: "THE WORLD DIDN'T KNOW YOUR NAME UNTIL CHARLIE DIED"
Candace Owens just went nuclear on Erika Kirk.
She said:
“The world didn’t know your name until he died. You attempted to build your brand thereafter, and you made an incalculable amount of money in the process.”
Before Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Erika was largely unknown. She had previously tried modeling, appearing in a music video, hosting a TV show, and interviewing politicians, but never broke through.
After the assassination, she became a household name and heavily leveraged the moment, including promoting Charlie’s final book and Turning Point events that generated massive merch sales and donations.
Is Candace out of line… or is she just saying what a lot of people are thinking?