NOTA PÚBLICA
Repúdio à queima da bandeira de Israel em ato no Rio de Janeiro
A StandWithUs Brasil repudia veementemente a queima da bandeira de Israel durante ato realizado no Rio de Janeiro na noite deste domingo (25), em comemoração ao resultado do segundo turno das eleições. Segundo vídeo que circula nas redes sociais, o gesto foi acompanhado da mensagem “Fora Israel das terras palestinas”.
Criticar governos e políticas de Israel é legítimo, como em relação a qualquer país. Queimar sua bandeira, porém, não é crítica: é um ataque ao símbolo do Estado e do povo israelense. É uma conduta que expressa a rejeição à própria existência de Israel. Negar ao povo judeu o direito à autodeterminação é uma forma de antissemitismo.
O gesto também contraria os princípios da política externa brasileira. A Constituição Federal, em seu artigo 4º, estabelece a autodeterminação dos povos, a defesa da paz e o repúdio ao racismo como fundamentos das relações internacionais do país, que há décadas defende a solução de dois Estados, com israelenses e palestinos vivendo lado a lado, em paz e segurança.
O antissemitismo é uma ameaça à própria democracia, e sua presença é um dos sinais mais claros de crise democrática. Deve ser combatido com firmeza, venha de onde vier e independentemente de lado político.
Manifestamos nossa solidariedade à comunidade judaica brasileira e a todos que defendem a paz no Oriente Médio.
StandWithUs Brasil
São Paulo, 26 de outubro de 2026.
It took 362 pages of pure logic to prove that one plus one equals two.
Russell and Whitehead built mathematics from the ground up in Principia Mathematica. Numbers became classes of equinumerous sets. Addition was defined through unions of disjoint classes. Only after hundreds of prior theorems did they reach the final step: 1 + 1 = 1 + ‘1, and 1 + ‘1 = 2, hence 1 + 1 = 2.
Even the simplest truth required an entire logical foundation to stand.
Certainty is expensive.
Oi greta, legal saber que você lembra do brasil
estamos NESSE MOMENTO em mais um recorde de queimadas na Amazônia.
O povo em Manaus quase não consegue respirar.
Aguardamos a flotilha de ajuda humanitária
A Muslim woman stands in the middle of Times Square with a sign:
“I AM A MUSLIM WHO LOVES ISRAEL. ASK ME WHY.”
She recites Quran to prove it.
Then she drops truth bombs:
• Hamas put hostages in the “safe” tunnels — not their own civilians
• 41 hostages died in captivity
• Nothing in Islam justifies October 7
• 2 million Muslims live freely in Israel
• Arabs rejected the 1947 two-state plan
• Want to free Palestine? First free it from Hamas
The crowd starts listening.
Some even thank her.
This is what real courage looks like. 🇮🇱
O Centro Histórico inundável de Paraty.
Não é defeito, é engenharia colonial do século XVIII!
Antigamente, as ruas foram construídas abaixo do nível da maré cheia e com as calçadas elevadas. Quando a maré subia, a água do mar entrava suavemente pelas pedras "pé de moleque" e, ao recuar, funcionava como uma verdadeira vassoura natural, limpando os resíduos da cidade.
Hoje em dia, esse sistema de saneamento antigo virou um espetáculo que encanta viajantes e fotógrafos do mundo inteiro. Quando a lua cheia ou a lua nova chegam, as ruas viram espelhos d'água perfeitos que refletem o casario colorido.
Um verdadeiro cenário de filme!
No Joke: The Islamic Republic of Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, reports to the U.N. General Assembly that they have “engaged in regional counter-terrorism efforts to combat terrorist groups.”
⚠️"Il faut que tout le monde voie ces images".
Guillaume Guérin, maire de Limoges, nous fait une visite de son Hôtel de Ville sous les décombres.
Je me refuse désormais à nommer ces gens-là d'émeutiers ou de casseurs.
Ce sont des terroristes.
Cold-hearted 🖤
Copenhagen pushes elderly in retirement homes to eat little meat to cut CO₂
Can they please get more meat on, say, their birthday?
No. A left-wing councilor:
Climate targets for everyone. And old people are “precisely the generation that polluted the most”
https://t.co/1EZcGdTXlu
Former UN Special Rapporteur Dr. Alice Jill Edwards exposes what we have been saying for years: the UN has abandoned neutrality!
When an organization meant to protect human rights refuses to fully acknowledge the atrocities Hamas committed on October 7, it loses its moral authority.
Francesca Albanese and Reem Alsalem not only failed to formally document these atrocities despite mounting evidence, but continue to deny them and publish vicious, false reports on the subject.
This is exactly the hypocrisy we are fighting against at the UN.
Alice Jill Edwards is the former UN special rapporteur on torture. In this op-ed for @Telegraph, she writes "that by failing to fully acknowledge the horrors of October 7, the body has abandoned neutrality."
https://t.co/dRmSqhW6qz
🚨 STUDY: 40% OF ACCOUNTS AMPLIFYING MARIO NAWFAL ARE LIKELY BOTS
A Combat Antisemitism Movement study looked at 10,015 X accounts that amplified posts by news aggregator Mario Nawfal and found that 40.5% were likely bots.
The researchers say this shows how fake accounts can fuel conspiracy theories and spread hate online.
@CombatASemitism
Heartbreaking 💔
Copenhagen climate politicians push elderly in retirement homes onto minimal meat to cut CO₂
Birthday wishes for beef are sometimes rejected “for the CO₂ accounts”
Residents pay for the food but often get organic vegetarian instead of what they want
https://t.co/lfExxYegXs
Guidelines (p.45): max 500g meat/week, max 80g beef/veal/lamb (~one kid’s burger/week)
https://t.co/x2jnIM3iOg
‼️🔎REVEALED: An internal document belonging to Hamas detailing plans to plant explosive devices in areas of displaced persons camps in Gaza.
The document shows that Hamas' engineering department proposed planting explosive devices around displaced persons camps and detonating them as IDF troops approached, placing the civilian population in the camps at risk, in order to create panic as a smokescreen for the escape of its operatives.
This was part of Hamas’ preparations to protect its leadership and operatives, while endangering and exploiting the civilian population in the area, fully aware that these actions were likely to cause direct harm to civilians.
Was Israel Justified in Bombing Hamas Combatants in Their Homes?
Israel is accused of committing war crimes by killing Hamas & Palestinian Islamic Jihad commanders in their homes. With the release of NAZA, critics focus on the fact that Israel knowingly struck Hamas and PIJ combatant while civilians, including children, were present, perhaps even waiting until they returned home and calculated the expected collateral damage. They then pose their supposed decisive question: Would Israel consider it acceptable for its enemies to kill IDF soldiers in their homes?
Once again, Hamas' entire battlefield strategy is erased from the discussion and the question has to be turned back around: Where exactly was/is the IDF supposed to attack Hamas for it to be considered acceptable?
In its 400-mile tunnel network built beneath those same homes, hospitals and mosques? When Israel struck senior Hamas commander Ibrahim Biari in the tunnel network serving as the Jabalia Battalion HQ, it was condemned for causing excessive collateral damage when some buildings fell as a result. This is the prime example cited by NAZA director Yuval Abraham and that strike did not even target a home.
Should Israel attack Hamas in hospitals it used as military bases? No serious analyst denies Hamas used hospitals for military purposes, above and below ground, or that numerous Hamas combatants were killed inside them, confirmed by their own martyr notices, so it’s not credibly disputable at this point. Then the IDF is accused of "targeting healthcare" even as over 100 “healthcare workers” are now confirmed to have been combatants, again, according to their own martyr notices. What about schools, where once again Hamas and PIJ's own martyr notices confirm dozens of their operatives were based? Israel is then accused of targeting education.
I have challenged critics to name a single Hamas military base. Of course no one can do so. Now Google "List of Israel Defense Forces Bases." Everyone knows where they are, which is why Hezbollah was able to precisely strike the dining hall of the Golani training base in Oct 2024, killing four soldiers. Hamas has no conventional military bases, instead its military infrastructure is embedded in hospitals, schools, civilian homes, and mainly in massive tunnels with shafts opening into residential buildings. There is overwhelming documentation of this. At this point only the most committed Hamas apologists will deny it. Hamas combatants also fight in civilian clothes, deliberately erasing the distinction between military deployment and civilian life. They hide weapons under beds, a Hamas leader literally admitted this fact to a New York Times reporter (look it up).
So where exactly can a Hamas combatant be killed? Only when he is standing in an open field holding an RPG? What Israel’s critics effectively demand is no attack. Hamas should enjoy permanent immunity. The human shield strategy must be rewarded. This is one of the main subtexts of NAZA and its promoters.
And that is why NAZA actually demonstrates the opposite of what its promoters claim. The IDF's attempt to carefully calculate expected civilian casualties before striking Hamas commanders, even in their homes, is precisely a key element of the proportionality assessment required by the Laws of Armed Conflict. Perhaps striking a Hamas commander in his home, with known and assessed collateral damage, was preferable to striking him in a tunnel network and bringing down surrounding buildings. There is no doubt many civilians have been killed in Gaza, a tragic consequence of the war Hamas started and refused to end by surrendering and returning the hostages, and it is reasonable to assess and critique this.
Yet nobody promoting NAZA as evidence of Israeli war crimes or genocide will ever seriously examine Hamas' battlefield strategy or the alternatives available to the IDF. They condemn strikes on homes, tunnels, hospitals, and schools without ever explaining where Hamas should have been attacked instead. They demand that Israel distinguish Hamas combatants from civilians while ignoring that Hamas deliberately organized its entire military strategy to make that distinction virtually impossible to make cleanly, because it viewed civilian deaths as a strategic benefit as its leaders openly and often admitted (again, only the most committed Hamas apologists will deny this).
Now, back to the comparison with the IDF. Yes, it WOULD be acceptable for Israel's enemies to target IDF soldiers in their homes if the following were similarly true: (1) IDF soldiers did not officially transition from civilian life to military deployment as normal militaries do (2) IDF soldiers remained in civilian clothes and engaged in combat in civilian clothes (3) IDF soldiers never deployed to military bases (4) The IDF did not utilize clearly marked, sole-purpose military bases and buildings, but instead co-located them within or beneath civilian structures (5) The IDF stored military equipment in homes and rockets in schools instead of weapons depots at military bases (6) The IDF used hospitals and synagogues throughout Israel for direct military purposes. (Putting aside of course that Hamas would murder every Jew on earth if they had the ability, as if they wouldn't attack a home).
Expect the same theme to continue: the complete erasure of Hamas from the battlefield analysis.