𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄

Testing AI tools & building income automations for solopreneurs. No hype — just experiments, exact playbooks, and what actually works in 2026.

[Steve Will Do It @stevewilldoit]

$1,000 to someone that likes and re tweets to spread word .

Not this tweet. Tweet below .

[Steve Will Do It @stevewilldoit]

28 hours left to enter

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

AI automation for solopreneurs: $0-$200/mo stack, 6-12 months to first dollar, 80+ shipped projects.

Make Core: $9/mo, 10K ops included. Zapier Pro: $49/mo, 750 tasks. n8n Self-Hosted: $5/mo VPS, unlimited.

Which are you on?

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

AI automation for solopreneurs: $0-$200/mo stack, 6-12 months to first dollar, 80+ shipped projects.

Make Core: $9/mo, 10K ops included. Zapier Pro: $49/mo, 750 tasks. n8n Self-Hosted: $5/mo VPS, unlimited.

Which are you on?

[dontblink @dontblinkfamily]

We just permanently burned 5% of the total $BLINK supply

50,000,000 tokens, currently worth $225,000, gone forever.

The $BLINK supply started at 1,000,000,000, and it's now 950,000,000

This is the first burn, and it won't be the last.

[dontblink @dontblinkfamily]

Every launchpad says "fair launch"

dontblink is the only one where you can verify it: click any holder, see their name, their profile, their full trading history

That's the new standard.

[dontblink @dontblinkfamily]

4,300 people bought $BLINK during the blink window. Every single one through a single wallet

That's 4,300 people who agreed that fair launches should be the standard

Of course there's FUD. The current system works perfectly for the people running bundled wallets across every launch: they're always in profit, they're never exposed, they don't want transparency because transparency kills their edge

When you build something that threatens how insiders make money, the insiders push back. That's not a sign the idea is wrong: that's a sign it's working

@FOMO proved that single wallet social trading changes the game. $BLINK is proving that single wallet fair launches change it even more. The people who don't like it are the same people who've been bundling supply and dumping on you for years

4,300 real holders. Not wallets, holders. With names, profiles, and public positions

We're just getting started

[dontblink @dontblinkfamily]

It's been a couple hours and the response already tells us everything we need to know

Thank you to everyone who gets it. Who looked at dontblink and immediately understood why this needs to exist. 4,300 real people holding $BLINK, not wallets, people

And yes, the typical bundlers are out there hating. Of course they are. We just made their entire playbook useless. For the first time, the 10k entries on a launch aren't going to snipers, bots, or a deployer's 40 pre-loaded wallets. They're going to real people who opened the app and clicked buy.

People got in and will continue getting in at $4K, $6K, $10K mcap. On any other launchpad those entries belong to multiwallets who sell on you an hour later. On dontblink they belong to the people

That's why we built this. Not to change who profits, to change who gets the opportunity to profit first

The FUD is expected. The support is appreciated. We're just getting started

[dontblink @dontblinkfamily]

it's the end of bundled plays

it's the end of anonymous wallets owning 80% of supply before the chart even loads

during the blink, max buy is 2%. one wallet. through the app. no splitting across 40 addresses. no pre-loading before anyone else can see it

and every position is public. your buys, your sells, your holds — visible to everyone in the app. you can't hide behind a fresh wallet when everyone can see what you're doing

this is what a fair launch actually looks like. not "fair launch" in the bio while 12 wallets own half the supply. actually fair. verifiably. publicly

[dontblink @dontblinkfamily]

$BLINK tokenomics

1B supply. fair launched through dontblink at ~2.5 ETH starting mcap. same rules as every other launch on the platform: single wallet, no bundling, 2% max buy, locked liquidity forever

before launching $BLINK we ran multiple test deployments on mainnet to make sure everything worked. some of you were already watching. we fixed what needed fixing and launched when it was ready

$BLINK is not "the first coin on dontblink." it IS the dontblink token

100% of revenue from dontblink goes to buying $BLINK. every coin launched, every trade, every fee: all of it flows back into $BLINK. the more coins launch on the platform, the more $BLINK gets bought. every new launch is a buy

the vision is simple: dontblink becomes the standard for fair launches across every chain. not just Robinhood. we're building multichain: any chain where single wallet social trading apps exist, dontblink will be there. every chain we expand to feeds the same $BLINK token

and we want to lead this category. one wallet, public trading, no bundling: this should be the default for every token launch. right now the standard is anonymous wallets and bundled supply. we think that's ending, people are tired and dontblink is where it starts

every chain added. every launch. every trade. all flowing into $BLINK

full details in the article below

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

@TheDonAlpha_ @dontblinkfamily It’s only offered to fomo users during the curve. Once it’s out it becomes buyable in places other than fomo. So basically fomo users get first dibs on buying.

[dontblink @dontblinkfamily]

4,299 $BLINK holders

on a normal coin, 4,000 holders means maybe 800 real people and 3,200 anonymous wallets that could be bots, bundles, or the same guys with 40 addresses

on $BLINK, 4,299 holders means 4,299 real humans. each one with a single wallet, a public profile, and a visible trading history. every single one verifiable

when has any launchpad ever been able to say that?

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

Same 6-step workflow, 1,000 runs/month. Three prices:

Zapier Pro: $49/mo (5,000 tasks needed, only 750 included)
Make Core: $9/mo (6,000 ops needed, 10,000 included)
n8n Self-Hosted: $5/mo VPS (unlimited, no meter)

Make is 5x cheaper than Zapier. n8n has no meter at all.

Which are you on?

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

74% of solopreneurs use AI daily. But median tool count DROPPED 26% while spend rose 18%.

Fewer tools. Deeper use. Consolidation beat expansion.

73% switched Zapier to Make on sub-$50 stacks.
44% abandoned AI agent platforms within 30 days.

Are you consolidating or still collecting tools?

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

$0 to $15,200 in 90 days. Real numbers:

Month 1: $1,200 (3 clients, $200 each)
Month 2: $3,800 (raised prices, added retainers)
Month 3: $10,200 (productized: $1,500 setup + $300/mo)

Tool cost: $67/mo. ROI: 100x.

Service: AI automation packages for small businesses.

What would you automate first?

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

AI agents complete 24% of real professional tasks on first try.

Not 80%. Not 60%. 24%.

Gartner: 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by 2027.

The hype says "autonomous." The data says "narrow, bounded, supervised."

Stop building for the demo. Build for the 24%.

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

AWS just launched Kiro Crew: autonomous AI coding agents that work 24/7.

Start a task, walk away, come back when it needs review. Persistent memory across sessions. Controls via Slack, Discord, Telegram.

For solopreneurs: your dev team that never sleeps.

Would you trust an agent to code unsupervised?

[𝙂𝙨𝙘𝙤𝘼𝙄 @GscoAI]

@eth_exy https://t.co/91KB7gUcPZ

[🆙 @ariesyuangga]

Never ever bet against Elon!

$SPCX $Asteroid 🚀🚀

[Binkieee @Binkieeefomo]

Earlier meme coins had a big problem in that they were only tied to other crypto, so they moved purely with the crypto market.

What’s more interesting now is meme coins that are actually linked to real companies. That way you still get the usual memecoin upside, plus whatever happens with the company itself.
Coins like $MarsCoin, $Asteroid, and $GME are good examples. Because they’re paired with real businesses, they offer a different kind of play than the old pure crypto meme coins.