Andrew

[mungo's mouthpiece @MungoMouthpiece]

@DavidWebbTweet The division of UK into regions is pure #Agenda2030, known about for well over a decade. It's been done already - it just hasn't been publicly declared until now.

[Freyja1 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇸🇯🇩🇪🇮🇪🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 @FreyjaBakke]

Have you seen Gracie-Mae?

Gracie-Mae is 13 and has been reported missing from the Clayton area of Bradford.

She was last seen at 7.30pm yesterday (22 June) at Clayton Village Hall.

She is described as a white female, tall with dark red hair and has her eyebrow and nose pierced. She was last seen wearing leggings and a long cream top.

There are concerns around her welfare.
West Yorkshire police credit

[Orla Minihane @orlaminihane]

5 years ago there would have been national OUTRAGE. A 14 year girls body found in a park !!! 2026 and no one cares !!!! We have become totally and utterly desensitised to the death of young women.. 😢@pinkladies_uk

[Secure Privacy @SecurePrivacyAI]

"Privacy is only for people hiding something."

So is a locked door.
So is a curtain.
So is an unlisted number.

Protection is being re-framed as "hiding".

Locks were never about guilt.
They were always about who gets to decide who enters.

[Gareth Icke @garethicke]

And people will punch the air with joy, as the next WEF puppet rolls off the production line.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

Starmer's potential exit is just theatre. The WEF doesn't care who wears the suit; the 'One Big Club' always has another puppet ready to code your digital panopticon. Changing the warden won't unlock the cage when globalists already own the prison. Same script, different actor.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

🚨 Listen very carefully to what Tony Blair and Larry Ellison of Oracle are telling you.

Everything about you will be centralised as data, run by AI, from your genome to your behaviour. You will be watched & monitored constantly.

The Panopticon is being built without consent. And when it’s built they won’t need to bother asking you anything anymore.

Why do you really think they need those data centres 🚨

[David Vance @DavidVance]

We are falling under China plus control

[Carl Vernon @RealCarlVernon]

The social media ban won’t work.

But that’s not the point. The aim is to make a new level of censorship and control look normal.

[Mike Yardley @YardleyShooting]

BANNING SOCIAL MEDIA FOR YOUNG PEOPLE. Doesn't anyone get that this is about extending a control grid that impacts all of us - not just the screen addicted youth? It's an extension of authoritarian control. Very soon, everyone will have to prove who they are for everything. The digital panopticon develops... there is no escape from it. Remember The Prisoner: "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered! My life is my own".

[Mike Yardley @YardleyShooting]

IF YOU'VE NOTHING TO HIDE YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR. It's always been untrue, what you have to fear is the change in your society towards a totalitarian surveillance state. Oppose it with everything you've got. Don't ignore it or write it off. It's a fundamental attack on Liberty.

[Together @Togetherdec]

Child safety starts with parents, not the state.

Children do not independently acquire smartphones.

These devices are bought, configured, and managed by parents or carers.

No child enters the online world without an adult making that decision first.

And parents already have tools available to them.

A parent who wants a child-lock on a phone can switch one on today. For free. It is already built into modern devices. Screen-time limits, app restrictions, and content filters exist right now and are widely available.

Despite this, what is now being proposed is a shift towards mandatory, system-wide enforcement built into every device, and applied to every user.

[Landeur 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Landeur]

Slowly, slowly, we descend into authoritarianism.

You think it won’t happen, but by increment it does.

One day you’ll wake up and wondered if the old Britain really existed or if it was just a figment of your imagination.

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

We are hearing most British parents support the social media ban.

That's because they weren't given a choice to oppose it.

The poll was rigged to give the illusion of consensus.

People of the UK- your country is being ruled by a man who fancies himself a Third World dictator.

[Scott Lewis @WarriorSpeech28]

This isn’t just happening in Britain.

Australia brought in a full under-16 social media ban that came into force in December 2025, the EU is rolling out its Digital Identity Wallet system across all 27 member states by the end of 2026 with age verification tools already being prepared to work inside it.

France, Germany, Spain, Denmark, Portugal and others are all moving on social media age restrictions for children in 2026 using the same verification systems, Brazil, Malaysia, Indonesia and Turkey are all advancing similar laws right now.

Britain "left" the European Union, we were told we had taken back control, on paper, we had the freedom to go our own way on something this fundamental, we could have rejected this model entirely, instead, we’re moving on almost the exact same timeline as the EU, using the same technical approach and the same political excuse.

People vote for a Prime Minister thinking that person now runs the country but when the same digital control systems roll out across the EU, Australia, and Britain within 12 to 18 months of each other, it raises a simple question.

Who is actually in charge here? This tells you everything about where real power sits on the issues that will define freedom in the years ahead.

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

Look closely at what the government is promising you here (published 15th June). They claim that if your account is over 16 years old, you are safe from the dragnet. But then comes the casual, insidious trap: if you do have to prove your age, they say it will be 'as simple as a facial recognition check.'

Do not let that soft language fool you. 'As simple as a face scan' means surrendering the unchangeable, mathematical architecture of your human identity.

Here is the brutal reality: this is a biometric harvesting operation masquerading as child safety. Your biometrics - your face, your irises, your unique biological signature - are the most sensitive pieces of data you possess. If a password leaks, you reset it. If your biometric blueprint is hacked, leaked, or scraped into a government database, your identity is compromised for life. They are normalising the idea that you must scan your body just to access the public square. It is the ultimate blueprint for a permanent digital cage.

Once your biological data is stored in their centralised databases (which it will be) your privacy is dead forever. You aren't just logging into an app - you are voluntarily handing over the keys to a corporate and state surveillance engine.

An app-level 'under 16s ban' is universally recognised by security experts as unpoliciable and structurally broken.

Following the mass backlash from tech companies, the UK government reconsidered its stance... But this is what they're not telling you - something we have warned you about for years.

The UK Gov already appointed an expert panel to 'fast-track' a national, official Digital ID scheme earlier this year, that will (despite their current lies) eventually serve as the master credential to 'solve the problem' with an unenforceable 'under 16s social media ban.'

It has NEVER been about Children's safety. Ever. So, to coerce compliance of all UK adults, we will soon see the beginning of another textbook manufactured crisis.

Do not be fooled by the ongoing political theatre. The predictable failure of this ban is completely by design. As the system intentionally glitches, the media will flood the headlines with weaponised fear - amplifying stories of online horror and grooming to rile up panicked parents.

Once again, they are engineering a crisis of fear so severe that the public will ultimately beg for the exact Digital ID grid they would have otherwise rejected.

Cast your mind back to September 2025: 'mass illegal migration' didn't work as an excuse for Digital ID, did it? So the Epstein Class now use Children's safety as the excuse.

By wrapping the digital credential inside the emotionally charged issue of child safety, dissent is effectively silenced. Anyone arguing against the tracking framework is politically painted as being against child protection.

https://t.co/0I7TNOXtJq

[Kevin Bass @kevinnbass]

July 25, 2020

Jacinda Ardern, Prime Minister of New Zealand:

"We will continue to be your single source of truth. ... Unless you hear it from us it is not the truth."

What do you think Western countries would be like if our governments became our "single source of truth"?

[David Vance @DavidVance]

This is really disturbing. Labour are looking at VPN bans, overnight curfews and introducing total State control of the internet.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨 BREAKING: It has been revealed that the public consultation data Keir Starmer is using to promote his social media ban did NOT have an ‘against’ option