𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

✨

[rory ⁵⁵ ²³ ⁴ @rorysainzjr]

my love in every universe ⁵⁵

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

I made a hardcore setup to block ads and scam calls. The world is finally peaceful.
(Also thankful for my natural instinct that steered me away from any client facing work.)

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

He has already apologised once. Even going to Oscar in person and offering a sincere, face-to-face apology would change nothing about the reality of the situation: his retirement was caused by a gearbox failure -- and to this day, neither the officials nor McLaren themselves have suggested or provided any evidence that the contact was responsible -- and the hard fact remains that he was never in a position to overtake Lando (if you have a problem with that, feel free to take it up on Lando's fan pages).
If you understand the actual sequence of events and the causes involved, yet still insist on these empty rituals of further apology, then this is probably not the sport for you. Formula 1 is, at its core, a competition between men.

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

@ugo029 (｡•̀ᴗ-)✧

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

Once I decide those disabled and phone addicted blocking the road are contributing nothing to my journey to office, hoping they just explode and get wiped off the street doesn't feel evil at all.
It's justified. Full stop.

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

His engineer only mentioned Piastri once, roughly 20 seconds before the contact, with no gap or position info. After that, zero updates. Even if Sainz knew someone was behind, drivers don't have a third-person view. Blind spots exist, especially when you're focused on the corner and fighting for position into T3/T4.
No one is trying to pin this on Alonso or claim Sainz did nothing wrong (at least I'm not). Piastri could also have been more cautious when lapping. But Sainz does carry responsibility for the contact. What we're clarifying is that the main factors were the blue flag system failure (which the stewards' verdict barely addressed) and Williams' engineer giving no timely information on position or gap. That's why you lot keep repeating the same incorrect "he ignored the blue flags" line (from lap 37 Turn 1 alone Sainz's onboard shows them flashing around 18 times if you wanna actually count) and inventing a "Piastri is right behind you" radio call that never existed.
You can keep believing the voice in your head that says Sainz definitely knew Piastri was there and just refused to look in his mirrors. From here, you're the one who looks beyond help.

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

@55blorb This is something almost no one has pointed out, and its critical logic

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

Finally someone actually did their job properly.
Shocking how most of the accounts I saw these days, they live and breathe this sport 24/7 and still put out the same lazy bullshit. I've unfollowed so many F1 accounts and bunch of stupid ppl over this. WTF

[james throwsinthetowels @55blorb]

well everybody has their opinions about the gp set in stone at this point but i think this guy did a really good point-by-point breakdown of what exactly went wrong during the race

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

@teamfifty5 Cos the "AUDIENCE" likes it....

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

> Job requires 10 years of Claude Code experience
> I need a job to get Claude Code experience
> Apply job: needs 10 years of Claude Code experience

[Issa - Build in HOME @issanode]

A empresa Yahoo! está pedindo 10 ANOS DE EXPERIÊNCIA COM CLAUDE CODE

10 ANOS DE CLAUDE CODE

O CLAUDE CODE TEM 1 ANO 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

The mid-section of the Hungaroring (T3–T6/7) is a continuous, narrow and highly technical sequence with limited safe space to yield. Until the car's condition is confirmed, even if you want to let the other car through immediately, staying predictable and stable then yielding at a more suitable point is still the safer call. That's risk management, not deliberate blocking. IMO
I don't know if this even counts as common sense of F1. If you think the car being lapped should just crash out and retire, that's up to you.
Plenty of people clearly share the same brain cell as Piastri: Backmarkers aren't allowed to fight for anything.
https://t.co/LrZDtPRlSH

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

@Tequilaholic6 @teamfifty5 Whatever you agree or not, he already did. The actual comments are right there at F1 website. Go watch/read the real coverage instead of those selectively edited fan pages.
https://t.co/qE1PQ7uJd4

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

@sasha_a @teamfifty5 https://t.co/xksVAZNi5e

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

Palmer's take is fair from an analyst's view: once you've made contact and know the other car is there, you should yield quickly and predictably.
The driver's reality is different. Right after contact, confirming the car is still controllable usually comes first. Suddenly changing line or lifting hard before that can create more risk than it solves. Cutting the corner later to create space is already a form of active yielding.
Sainz's radio call to check the rear left suggests he followed the "confirm the car, then yield" sequence. Understandable in the moment, even if it looked messy from the outside.

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

https://t.co/xksVAZNi5e

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

Palmer's take is fair from an analyst's view: once you've made contact and know the other car is there, you should yield quickly and predictably.
The driver's reality is different. Right after contact, confirming the car is still controllable usually comes first. Suddenly changing line or lifting hard before that can create more risk than it solves. Cutting the corner later to create space is already a form of active yielding.
Sainz's radio call to check the rear left suggests he followed the "confirm the car, then yield" sequence. Understandable in the moment, even if it looked messy from the outside.

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

To those parroting that Sainz "ignored eight blue flags" : the blue-flag system itself was broken, and the car actually under blue flags was Alonso behind him. Explaining this for them is basically talking to the void.
The race engineer only mentioned, more than 30 seconds before contact, Alonso's one-stop and that Alonso would be serving blue flags for Piastri -- no position, no gap, no update -- While Sainz was battling Alonso side-by-side, his mirrors were full of the Aston. How was he supposed to see Piastri?
The FIA document never mentions the system failure. The five second penalty is purely for causing a collision (blind spot as mitigating factor). Sainz accepted it as a racing incident. When asked if he'd speak to Piastri he essentially said "No need, he'll understand once he’s out of the car." Probably trying to de-escalate and not give haters more fuel. Yet the usual crowd still claims he owes an apology (he already said sorry) and refuses to take any responsibility.
The real punchline? That same crowd includes Piastri himself. Even after getting out of the car, he still couldn't see the bigger picture.
And now, in the classic media selective-quoting style, here's how his comments get twisted as they did to Carlos as usual:
"What are those backmarkers even racing for? Acting like you're world champions? I'm the world champion! Move the FUCK out of the way, you're blocking everything idiot!"
"How hard is it to check your mirrors? How could you not see me? All excuses!"
“Something as simple as letting a faster car past and you still can't manage it!”
(As a journalist gifted with mind-reading powers, I can confirm he definitely means he himself would never make such a basic mistake… because he's a world champion, after all! And clearly Sainz was happy to let Lando, Max, Kimi, Charles and Lewis through, he just specifically didn't want to let Piastri past. Must have been on purpose! )

[luna 🦄 @Erendisty]

AMuS about why Carlos isn't wholly to blame for the collision with Oscar:

"It was a five-second penalty from race officials. At first glance, it looked more than justified. But it's worth a second look." 1/

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

https://t.co/Soa9z5Angs
Comments still full of NPCs repeating the same nonsense. Most of them didn't even watch the video or just can't/resist to understand it.
Unfortunately these retards always love sharing their opinions and infest every sport.

[닉네임뭐하지⁵⁵ @but__a_but_why]

조폭과 천사의 조합 카를로스 사인츠

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

@PilarCamachoG @wearetherace Reading comprehension: 0
Adiós

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

@PilarCamachoG @wearetherace It has nothing to do with not wanting to check the drivers' onboard yourself. You just watch the highlights and SNS posts, then pretend you've actually watched the race.

[𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒆𝒏 @GuestQueen]

@PilarCamachoG @wearetherace NPCs are such a funny thing.
They're coded by the social narrative and just keep looping the same lines:
"8 blue flags… 8 blue flags…"
"He never apologised… he never apologised…"
No matter how hard you try, you can't change their single pre-written script.