Gun Tests Magazine

Gun Tests Magazine is the consumer resource for the serious shooter. We compare handguns, rifles, shotguns, and shooting accessories and recommend purchases.

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Not the Bill of Needs

[TX Neanderthal 24601_2 @ThRealKonzilla8]

@UltraJohnus

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

This

[Mark W. Smith/#2A Scholar @fourboxesdiner]

@UltraJohnus Don’t get me wrong. I believe in the first amendment. But you don’t need more than 10 books and three TV channels.

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Yes, this.

[Kurt Schlichter @KurtSchlichter]

Go buy a gun today.

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

True. Or how about fees for voting? If one right is encumbered, why not another?

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

The responsible gun owner secures his or her firearms from the deranged or the inept.
https://t.co/IeoMIqIhBb

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Awesome take, Jake

[Colion Noir @MrColionNoir]

Jake Paul said we need to update the Constitution because of the Second Amendment.

I thought I knew where this was going.

Then he said citizens may need drones, drone EMPs, RPGs, and anti-helicopter weapons.

Not on my bingo card.

But he accidentally made the purest 2A argument there is.

Because anti-gun people love saying:

“You can’t fight a tyrannical government with an AR-15.”

Okay.

Then let us have what the government has.

That is the logical endpoint of their own argument.

If the Second Amendment exists as a check on tyranny, then “the government has better weapons” is not an argument against the Second Amendment.

It is an argument for taking it seriously.

Where I split from Jake is simple:

We do not need to rewrite the Second Amendment.

We need to read it.

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Arms.

It does not say pistols and shotguns only.

So be honest:

Did Jake Paul accidentally make the best pro-2A argument of the year?

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Correctamundo.

[Mrgunsngear @Mrgunsngear]

The 5th Circuit ruled that restrictions on handgun sales across state lines (or to out of state residents, said differently) violates the 2nd Amendment.

Why? Because it literally says "shall not be infringed." It's right there in the Amendment but for some reason this took ~60 years to fix.

Regardless, I'll take the win 🇺🇸

#CivilRights #2nd #2a

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Exactly.

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

We endorse this concept fr. But ‘most’ 7.62 mags are 20-round.

[Brass Kicker @BrassKickerLLC]

Some bullsh*t for real

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

GRIFTERS lose again.

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Because no court has forced jurisdictions to consider licenses as antithetical to our rights.

[SheepDog Society LLC @SDSLLC_USA]

Concealed carry fees were settled a long time ago with this ruling. So why are they still ignoring this ruling and making us pay?

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

If only it were CJ Clarence Thomas. He and Alito are the only ones who know what ‘infringed’ means, it seems.

[AWR Hawkins @AWRHawkins]

Clarence Thomas: 2A ‘Assumes the Right, It Doesn‘t Grant a Right‘ https://t.co/EqAslsBvoI via @BreitbartNews

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Thank you AAG Dhillon

[AAGHarmeetDhillon @AAGDhillon]

A right delayed is a right denied. Minnesota cannot deny Americans the right to purchase commonly owned firearms with weeks-long waiting periods. The @CivilRights Division’s Second Amendment Section will challenge these violations of fundamental rights!

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Yes, affordable lead bullets. Thank you Mr President

[American Firearms Association @2A_Freedom]

Win for gun owners and the 2A:

"We believe that public lands belong to the AMERICAN PEOPLE and to the public. And hunters, fishers, and outdoorsmen should be able to access them."

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

We know a bunch of oldsters who hate ARs. Sad, but no surprise

[Rob Romano @2Aupdates]

A majority of the 18-29 age group supports the Supreme Court finding that AR-15s are protected by the Second Amendment. In fact, the only age group that clearly opposes AR-15s is the 60+ group:

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Peak Alloy?

[Doc Strangelove @DocStrangelove2]

>local range put up a big “NO STEEL CASE AMMO YOU WILL BE BANNED” sign

I hate Fudds so much

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

He burnt our bridge when he bragged in 2022 about teaming up with President Joe Biden and Senator Chris Murphy to pass S.2938 — the largest federal gun control package in over 30 years. Good riddance

[TeaPartyOG @TeaPartyOGs]

We've seen more X posts from John Cornyn in the months since his reelection beatdown than we have in the past 6 years! Every one of them critical of either Ken Paxton, Bo French or MAGA. Cornyn spent $110 million trashing Paxton in their primary only to be bigly defeated. Cornyn is a wretched, bitter geriatric who would prefer a communist James Talarico win the Texas Senate seat than the man overwhelmingly selected by Texas voters to replace him. Cornyn is the poster crook for the DC Swamp.

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

Dang, another one bites the dust.

[Firearms Policy Coalition @gunpolicy]

FPC VICTORY: Fifth Circuit Strikes Down Federal Interstate Handgun Purchase Ban https://t.co/8vb2Ymm8vY

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

This DOJ is OKAY

[John Crump @right2bear]

BREAKING: DOJ Says 18-20 Year Old Handgun Ban VIOLATES 2nd Amendment https://t.co/2bEnARPfeX

[Gun Tests Magazine @GunTestsMag]

The Militia Act should be the end of the conversation. Founding-era law requiring 18yo’s to own AR-15s. Oops. Founding Era analogues of the AR, the KR.

[Shermichael Singleton @MrShermichael]

🚨 BREAKING: DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel just dropped a bombshell opinion — federal law banning licensed dealers from selling handguns to 18- to 20-year-olds is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

In a memo dated Sept. 17, 2026, Assistant AG @ElliotGaiser tells @AGToddBlanche that 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(b)(1) and (c)(1) can no longer be enforced against dealers who sell handguns to law-abiding adults ages 18–20.

The reasoning is devastating:

→ These are citizens old enough to be drafted, vote, serve on a jury, and be sentenced to death — but not buy a handgun from a licensed dealer.

→ Under Bruen/Heller, 18-20-year-olds are unquestionably part of "the people" the 2nd Amendment protects.

→ The Founding-era Militia Act of 1792 didn't just allow 18-year-olds to own guns — it REQUIRED them to.

→ The government couldn't find a single "well-established and representative" historical tradition of banning gun sales by age. The closest analogues (contract law for minors, post-Civil War statutes) don't even target the same problem the same way.

→ OLC explicitly says courts upholding the age ban got it wrong post-Bruen/Wolford/Hemani.

This doesn't ban age restrictions on possession or the enhanced background check period for under-21 buyers — but it guts the felony ban on dealers selling handguns to 18-20-year-olds.

An entire generation of young adults just got their 2A rights back. 🇺🇸