@dacarter68@bears_aware "Public meetings" has been interpreted to include:
protests
rallies
demonstrations
political gatherings
parades
public meetings
@dacarter68@bears_aware "89ย (1)ย Every person commits an offence who, without lawful excuse, carries a weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition while the person is attending or is on the way to attend a public meeting."
@hanshanot@TheChaosWeeber Weird take. People should be able to defend themselves. Full stop.
What about a man who identifies as a female? Csn they carry tools for self defense?
@Michelle_in_ON@MuskokaCD@PrairieVeteran@Irish667 You realize that a party leader cant ban an application, right? Any MP csn choose to apply.
You half-wits are arguing out of both sides of your mouths.
@Timoyr3@IanRunkle@PoopFromDaButt Slings are not secure - the majority tie up a hand/arm. Not ideal when you're sloghing through rough country. They're not comfortable, there's risk of snow/mud/debris becomng lodged in the barrel. The barrel constantly get hung up on branches and they throw your balance off.
@MarkJCarney The Liberal party of Canada treats the document like rights and freedoms arebnly a suggestion.
Perfect example is the fact that we have no right to property. Things that we prlurchase legally, can be stripped from us on a whim, with no justification.