The Truth About Politicians Who Advocate For Gun Control
Many people make a fundamental mistake about politicians. They believe politicians want to solve our problems. They are mistaken. Politicians do not care about solving your problems or my problems. They are only interested in solving their own problems. Their biggest problem is, "How do I get elected?" Their second biggest problem is, "How do I get re-elected?"
Whatever concern of theirs that comes in after that lags far, far behind the first two.
As such, politicians are nothing more than professional leeches whose every public statement and utterance revolves around one main concern: Is what I am about to say going to garner me votes, or will it cost me votes? Thus they always choose what they say based on that calculation.
So when you hear a politician say he's in favor of some sort of "gun control", that means he feels that the majority of his constituents favor that position, and that if he then advocates for it, it will make him more popular and increase his electoral viability. To put it another way, he feels he'll get more votes if he comes out in favor of it.
The ONLY other reason a politician will advocate for gun control is a far more nefarious and sinister one: He doesn't really believe in the 2nd Amendment at all and thinks the American people should be disarmed. He can't come right out and say this (at least not yet), so you'll hear things like "common sense gun control" and "how many more people must die before we act?", but this individual really just wants us completely disarmed.
He wants that because he is an autocrat who believes in an enormous, centralized government that controls every aspect of our lives (or at least every aspect that is important to them, of which our safety and security certainly isn't), and he understands that a disarmed populace is obviously much, much easier to dominate and control than an armed one.
This person doesn't give a damn about saving lives, and that's not at all why he wants our guns. The only life he might ever have cared about saving was one that might vote for him. Beyond that he doesn't care at all. It's all about power and control and forcing us to bend to their will.
And that's so much easier when none of us has any guns.
Multiculturalism means embracing every other culture over the West’s.
Under the guise of “inclusion,” it acts as a Trojan horse that delivers the total erasure of Western culture in practice.
Every person and organization promoting it is an enemy of the West.
UK Police slam a White boy onto the ground, choke him & tell him to stop being a bitch after HE was just attacked.
Poor kid was hysterical & just kept asking what he had done wrong.
There is something very wrong with the UK & their Police force.
White Kids are not safe from foreign criminals or Police. When they are harmed the Police just traumatise them further.
Police are supposed to serve & Protect the community not terrorise them.
DIGWA TAUNTED AND TORTURED HENRY FOR 10 MINUTES!!
Henry lay dying, pleading for help. DIGWA AND the POLICE mocked and laughed at him.
They didn’t play the additional clips or recordings in court. They said “it’s too disturbing.”
Yet it’s what Henry endured-what DIGWA and his family did to him.
THE UK MUST RELEASE EVERYTHING!!!
Daily Mail:
“23:22 Digwa used his own mobile phone to film his victim attempting to escape by climbing onto a commercial rubbish bin and over a fence, while Digwa taunted: ‘You’re not going to get away with this, big man.’
Sentencing Digwa, Judge William Mousley KC said: ‘You continued to make films of Henry suffering, ignoring much of his desperation at having been stabbed. You told him that had not happened, no doubt to convince others who were nearby.’”
THESE CLIPS HAVE NOT BEEN RELEASED.
Henry managed to land on top of a car parked in front of number 68, on the other side of the fence he jumped over.
Digwa went on to take close-up photos of the incapacitated Henry lying on the ground.
In footage from a home security camera, Henry was heard saying ‘I am dying’, with Digwa replying, ‘you’re not dying bro’.
Ten minutes later, Henry said ‘you stabbed me’, with Digwa responding, ‘no, I didn’t’, and ‘you were recording me thinking you’re sick’, which is slang for ‘tough’.
In that ten-minute period, Digwa did not call an ambulance but did film Henry for a full five minutes.
This clip was not played in court for being ‘too disturbing to be shown’.
The court heard the attack was not witnessed, but neighbours heard Henry say he had been stabbed and was dying.
Here is video of protesters at the murderer’s home.
JUSTICE FOR HENRY.
DIGWA’S FAMILY MUST BE JAILED AND THEN DEPORTED!!
@TruthFairy131@AARNOEXCELLENT One day when the West's future is written in history books, a big question that will be asked is, "Why did they voluntarily do this?"
Clint Eastwood never needed a cape to be a hero. For decades, he represented something America doesn’t produce enough of anymore: toughness, self-reliance, personal responsibility, and a refusal to back down when things get difficult.
Whether it was on the big screen or off it, Eastwood always seemed to embody the idea that freedom comes with responsibility, that hard work still matters, and that Americans are capable of solving their own problems without being told what to think.
Love his movies or not, Clint Eastwood became an American icon because he reflected the values that built this country: grit, independence, and the belief that ordinary people are stronger than they realize.
@MrAndyNgo Hasan Piker is the PERFECT avatar of "socialist"
Encourages violence, but runs when confronted.
A "man of the people", but needs body guards.
Wears expensive jewelry, clothing, but wants to end capitalism.
The PERFECT socialist.
@ChrisDJackson The slightly unsettling thing about this post is that the individual who wrote this completely fictional drivel might just actually believe it.
The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.
Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.
@77WABCradio Fuck Abdul Carter. Why do these people automatically assume they have the moral high ground, that they are right? Why do they assume that there is something wrong with Trump and something wrong with supporting him? The blind arrogance is intolerable and insufferable.
@TroyHollabaugh1@Maga4liberty I don't want to insult your intelligence by assuming you actually believe what you've written here, but I'm left with no other choice. Nothing personal.