@lilyraynyc Googles fail is one thing. The other one is, the people who don't have any moral - abusing THIS domain for their purposes... How can they look into the mirror without being ashamed of themselves?
@Zooglymedia ๐ฏ and why would anybody be so generous/ stupid to reveal the hidden secret?
SEO feeds me well, but I work hard, honestly and create value for my clients - and learned how to to do it in the last 15y. This get rich kids mentality/ without effort is a mess.
@lilyraynyc That's fascinating and exactly what I meant, when we talked at the Campixx ๐... And the purpose can me measured indirectly in many ways.
@JoyanneHawkins@iPullRank Lol I think it was 2012 when we scanned forums for rankings/ traffic (well that time also link power) where to set our links.
Like Fashion, SEO-tactics are coming back! ๐๐
@searchmartin Likes might be easier manipulated, no one sees if its real / bots + people like mad stuff without getting bad reputation and you can target them better (btw there had been cases where people got fires in Germany because of liking things, though that wasn't Elnos intention)
@iPullRank@carolynholzman I don't agree on this. Hash links can appear in a descripion/ as site links.
Sure if hash urls get all the traffic, that's something to investigate it, but it's not a proof of the canonical system being broken, that they get clicks via search.
@dejanseo Thank you! For me: I am also questioning the "old" approach on delivering content, it must be delivered more than into an article on a website and more valuable, and in more formats, so it can beat AI answers.
@randfish@iPullRank Thank you! You had been an inspiration for the industry and you are still โฅ๏ธ.
PS: you might wanna delete the link to the mens-luxury keyworddomain ๐๐