@USMNTnuisance@Landonicus@Dhaneye You’re spinning out homie. All of this because you felt the need to glaze Johnny. So it looks like we are done here because we really aren’t talking about OG topic.
Played and coached at the collegiate level. Good night.
@USMNTnuisance@Landonicus@Dhaneye Haha. You would try to make the connection. I was just calling you a douchebag that never played. That wasn’t me demanding someone’s resume. That was me calling you a prick knowitall that’s still in his basement.
@USMNTnuisance@Landonicus@Dhaneye Haha. Still trying I see. I don’t need to give my resume to some rando on X even if he demands it. The fact that you’re trying so hard is projection on your inadequacies.
@USMNTnuisance@Landonicus@Dhaneye Bro I already did. I don’t need to say it anymore. Some rando is trying desperately to talk shit because he got called out earlier. The more you try, the more bullshit it becomes. And we all know it.
I asked you the same question yesterday and this was response? Why the change? California's system is **more conducive to fraud** than stricter states'.
Key factors: universal unsolicited mail ballots, no photo ID, allowed third-party harvesting with weak chain-of-custody, postmarked-by-ED but received up to 7 days later, and lenient signature verification (presumption of validity, similar traits OK, cure periods).
These expand opportunities for harvesting, ineligible ballots, or manipulation vs. photo-ID + same-day-deadline systems.
Proven cases remain rare per official data, but detection is harder with mail volume; recent federal probes in LA signal real concerns. Late Dem-leaning ballots in races like LA mayor follow known patterns, not automatic proof of cheating—but the design invites scrutiny.
Vigilance and reforms matter.
@Elex_Michaelson@FlashReport That’s a great anecdote. You’ve helped condition California into thinking voting should always take a month. You’re the problem.