@BIG_TRAKAS@ExtantBuffalo They did, raiding parties weren't exactly uncommon but it was also very dangerous. Rough seas nights watch patrols. But they absolutely did do this.
@111Bread@RestoreLich@PaigeGCMG Seems oddly aggressive for a genuine question. Affiliation with a party and having access to sensitive information don't go hand in hand, thats why i'm asking. And for clarity, i think the negative press around this guy suggests i'd like him removed also for the parties benefit
@WLFRafterdark@emoassloser@CactusOfSupply It specifies the person in the shot is โYouโ so you canโt be handing yourself an Apple.
Itโs arguably the Cameras POV of you presenting an Apple to it. But I feel like that (weird to say) isnโt in the spirit of what POV is meant to entail
@AFrazzledScot@jerryjackosn@scottishgreens Someone else saying itโs related to the redrawing of the electoral map so itโs a sort of best estimate here where they have estimated who would have won what.
Which makes sense to be fair just not highlighted on the chart unfortunately
@notanerable@jerryjackosn@AFrazzledScot@scottishgreens Which is fair enough, but they could have added a disclaimer to the chart then no? Given like the other guy said, the chart implies itโs the same (in the context of what he was responding to)
@notanerable@jerryjackosn@AFrazzledScot@scottishgreens Heโs absolutely correct. According to that chart it would be SNP down 6 and greens up 6. Iโm assuming the issue is the chart uses end of term figures against this election rather than using the 2021 results? Not sure why it would be wrong otherwise unless someone can clarify
@JoeOttenX@GarethDennis The space between the tracks would normally be level bedded so the panels can easily be fitted, the parts either side of the tracks would normally have a ballast shoulder making it more difficult. i images the intention is to also make allowance for maintenance tamping
@LudovicMamet@TouchlineX Was thinking this myself. Weโve seen that before players getting an undeserved first yellow and the while the second yellow is 100% justified it in theory should have been their first.
@PJOConroy@Dallasger Iโve responded to your first message but honestly not worth engaging you at this point. Clearly youโll defend your own fans actions even if they are out of order.
Iโll not respond after this cause your as bias as it comes.
@PJOConroy@Dallasger seems like youโll basically defend anything other than the folk mocking the ibrox disaster then.. waste of time talking to you
Coins thrown, damaged seats/bathrooms, graffiti and damage to the concourse.
What about the guy that got flykicked, think he was looking for a fight?
@PJOConroy@Dallasger No he wouldnโt.. heโd end up in the Broomloan. To end up the GF1 heโs need to be facing down the line when heโs clearly turned into the pitch.
Both sets of fans were out of order. Iโm happy to admit that are you?
@PJOConroy@Dallasger It does change your point because you specifically brought up the direction he was coming from. If he walks backwards from where heโs facing he ends up in the Celtic end..
Stop moving goal posts and jumping through hoops to save face. You were wrong, no point going on about it.
@PJOConroy@Dallasger You then said โclearly the Rangers endโ stop trying to avoid what you said and the fact you were wrong. Just accept it and move on with your day.
You also claimed it was the half way line which it also isnโt.
@PJOConroy@Dallasger What are you talking about? You claimed it was the Rangers end, Iโve told you how it literally canโt be. End of discussion. You were wrong.
@PJOConroy@Dallasger I couldnt care less about a scarf being in his hand or not. The picture canโt be from anywhere else. There are only two โbig screens at ibrox and the one on the Broomloan has a blue โboxtโ sponsor wall.
You canโt see that on the one in the image. It has to be the Celtic end.