My son, the best assets are female.
A cow gives you milk to sell, yet you keep the cow.
A hen gives you eggs to sell, yet you keep the hen.
You pocket cash every morning, while the animal stays alive and safe in your compound.
But a bull and a cock only pay you on the day they are slaughtered. To get the cash, you have to kill the asset.
Take my counsel: do not put your money in males. Put it in females.
Be blessed.
To fully comprehend this, take time to look at the way Catholic Priests handle their tools in service ie the small cloth, the cups, bottles, candles, etc.
@CrystoPanda I feel for that beautiful girl on the extreme left. She is definitely gonna come back to this video after a couple of years with a revised definition of pettiness/stupidity.
@nbstv@ManuelaPMulondo The "if this, then this" fallacy, known as Affirming the Consequent or Denying the Antecedent, is a logical error where one incorrectly assumes that because a condition is true, the reverse or inverse is also automatically true. It invalidly assumes the causes for a result
@MrHenrie_@kingsaha_256 Great stuff Mr. Henrie!
Naye ssebo kindly stop the temptation to misuse the title Kabaka. Their is only one Kabaka. Many Kings but only one Kabaka. Kabaka does not necessarily translate to King BTW. Thank you very much for your attention to this.
@mukulaa .@Dr_Samkazibwe kindly have the good captain join our kenyan expert (the one from greater masaka) for a panel discussion on these subjects. Thanks
We proudly spotlight Eng. Dr. Vianney Andrew Yiga, a Mechanical Engineer and Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Makerere University, Uganda.
Dr. Yiga earned his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Makerere University in 2022 and completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the Division of Polymer Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (2022–2023). His research focuses on waste management and converting waste materials into value-added products, with extensive publications in international scientific journals.
Beyond academia, he serves as Chief Operations Officer at Yosevi Engineering Services (U) Ltd and is a full editorial board member for both Discover Applied Sciences Journal (Springer Nature) and Waste Management Bulletin Journal (Elsevier).
We congratulate him as he takes the Engineers’ Oath, honoring a career marked by innovation, research excellence, and impactful engineering leadership.
#WED2026
#RegisteredEngineers
#AnnualEngineersOath #WorldEngineeringDay2026 #ForEngineeringExcellence
@beewol Banange will the KFM frequency be sufficient to accommodate all of us? To avoid over crowding, I suggest all neighbouring stations tune in the same show jaja-address style
#UnpopularOpinion #660. From living in a government pool housing apartment when I was a young officer, to a bungalow as a senior officer, now making final plans to live in an apartment again as a retired officer. Life goes into circles. When all lights get shut one by one & the children choose to abandon the old styled bungalows to the now trending condos, you find yourself living with your wife just the same as when you had just married, but this time in a huge empty house. This applies to the huge farm house in the village that you erected during your prime. Children don’t want to even celebrate Christmas with you. It’s left to a care taker who if not careful, will enjoy your marital bed with village “belles”. Why do we build personal mega projects for families? Be wise. Be humble. Be simple. Invest your money in businesses that give you cash flow than big personal houses that you can’t even give a coat of paint in your retirement age.
I am currently in Bundibugyo but man this place is so hilly and mountainous that even cows and goats use walking sticks while grazing so as to gain stability and properly navigate the rugged terrain.
Mathematically & scientifically, the question "which one is the **first lady**" in a polygamous presidential household has no single, universal scalar answer — it depends entirely on the **chosen metric** (ordering criterion).
Let's define it rigorously with a few objective functions people implicitly use:
1. Chronological order (seniority by marriage date)
Let t₁ = marriage date to Marie Khone Faye ≈ 2008–2010 (≈15–17 years before 2024 election)
t₂ = marriage date to Absa Faye ≈ 2023
→ t₁ < t₂
→ Marie Khone Faye = argmin(t) = **First Lady by seniority** (most common cultural heuristic in West African polygamous contexts)
Verdict: Marie Khone Faye ranks 1st with probability ≈ 0.85–0.95 when the question uses "first" literally as temporal precedence.
2. Ordinal ranking assigned by official protocol / Wikipedia / state communication (2024–2026 evidence)
Wikipedia + multiple Senegalese & international outlets list:
Marie Khone Faye → **First Lady of Senegal (sole entry in many formal bios)
Absa Faye → Première dame / recognized public First Lady / co-present in many events
→ Official protocol function f(official_status) → Marie Khone Faye = 1, Absa Faye = 1b or 2
3. Visibility / media salience function (event co-occurrence 2025–2026)
Let V(name) = number of high-profile appearances as "Première dame" in protocol photos, Merck Foundation events, Christmas messages, AFCON trophy poses, Sonko group hugs, etc.
Recent sampling (2025–Jan 2026):
- Marie Khone Faye dominates in foundation / diplomatic / family-unity frames
- Absa Faye stronger in festive / youth / social-media-friendly appearances
→ Approximate salience ratio ≈ **Marie Khone : Absa ≈ 60 : 40** (very rough ordinal proxy)
4. Equity model under Islamic fairness constraint (adl / qist)
In theory the president must allocate resources R (time, attention, affection, public exposure) such that:
R_Marie(t) = R_Absa(t) ∀ t ∈ [inauguration, ∞)
→ No mathematical "first" exists — both wives receive rank = 1 with multiplicity 2
→ The set of First Ladies = {Marie Khone Faye, Absa Faye} (cardinality 2, no total order)
This is the only model that is **symmetric** and religiously compliant, but it clashes with the linguistic need for a singleton in English/French ("the first lady").
Scientific bottom line (decision theory view)
There is no objective, culture-independent winner because "first" is not a physical observable — it's a social construct with different utility functions across audiences:
- Traditionalists / seniority prioritizers → Marie Khone Faye** (P ≈ 90 %)
- Protocol / Wikipedia literalists → **Marie Khone Faye**
- Modern / pluralist / "both are dope" camp → **tie** or **both**
- Strict Islamic equity purists → **undefined / both rank 1**
So the maximally honest mathematical answer is:
**Marie Khone Faye is the First Lady under the L¹ (temporal) and L∞ (official protocol) norms, while the L² (balanced visibility + affection) norm returns a draw.**
Which norm do *you* personally weight highest? 😄🇸🇳
This Swahaba Kasumba a well known islamic believer who converted to a traditional believer. When you convert to Christianity we say you’ve accepted Jesus, when you convert to Islam we say you’ve accepted Allah, what do we say when you convert from your religion to a traditional believer?