@SignalBlue2 I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case. The article is rather generous with it's amount of critiques of JJ, and I think certain paragraphs are very misrepresentative tbh
18 years after creating his own Wikipedia page (which was subsequently deleted) and 3 years after making a video decrying Wikipedia itself, J. J. McCullough is now notabe enough to have his own Wikipedia page.
@SignalBlue2 Oh, good one, I didn't think of that!
What type of 'boy' is Starmer tho? I'm tempted to say 'white boy' but that would be redundant since I already used that for Pierre.
Lawyer boy? British boy? Glasses boy? Idk
@sacha_militaire Idk how effective it will be at convincing anyone that isn't already convicned that Putin never wanted to actually sit down and hold meaningful talks, but I'm glad it out's there for the record.
Great, glad we got that out of the way! Now that we’ve done this song and dance for over a year, can we finally admit that Russia cannot be negotiated with in good faith so we can arm Ukraine to the teeth?
@sacha_militaire To prove that Russia is not and has not been a good faith negotiator regarding constructive ways to end the war. If Putin's positions was common knowledge, I wish the US administartion saw it that way.