What is happening in the Taylor-Lazar Wisconsin Supreme Court race? I spoke with Courthouse News about the current state of the contest, including why spending looks so different this year. https://t.co/tp9EowBB4y
#WisconsinPolitics#WisconsinSupremeCourt#Election2026
Grateful to be interviewed for this new NPR Throughline episode on how Super PACs became a force in U.S. elections, and why they matter so much now. Great to join Michael Kang. #SuperPACs#NPRThroughline#Elections#CampaignFinance#MoneyinPolitics
https://t.co/gP88G5ZSdb
Understanding the diploma divide
@DaveAHopkins & I were on the The Vital Center podcast with @RuleandRuin in a first-of-it's-kind @NiskanenCenter pod crossover event!
https://t.co/ehsxtcrqCp
Wisconsin Supreme Court:
-7 counties (in light grey) voted for the conservative in 2019 & flipped liberal in 2020 & ‘23
-1 county (in darker grey) went liberal in 2019 & 2020, then conservative in ‘23
-Both Milwaukee & Waukesha counties moved 10 points to the left from ‘19 to 23.
Update: Make that $104.5 million in spending on Wisconsin's Supreme Court race.
That includes $57.2 million by @TeamSchimel and those backing him compared to $47.3 million by @crawfordforwi and those supporting her.
And more reports come in every day ...
.@Harvard Prof. Michael Sandel, creator of the popular course “Justice,” says that the U.S. election boiled down to one fundamental question. @JusticeHarvard@WalterIsaacson
I’m proud to work at @riponcollege with such excellent students who really shined tonight! Thank you, @WisconsinEye, for live-streaming the discussion.
@Kasparov63 "American elections vote for people, not parties." No, someone's party identification is incredibly powerful in predicting how people vote. American politics is very tribal. That's why you can say outrageous things as a candidate and still get away with it.
🚨 My final election analysis: who will win?
Dude, Where's My Man Wave?!
Its Starting to Look Like America Understands the Assignment
We’re humans, we like certainty.
In fact, we crave certainty of event outcomes that probabilistic models and horserace polling simply can’t give us.
The simple gender gap in my last @MULawPoll is women 14 points for Harris, men 12 points for Trump, a 26 point gap.
But note women are more for Harris than men in *every* demographic except rural & small town.
Read down, smallest gap at top, largest at bottom.