Harold Thomas @HTakaHardTimes - Twitter Profile

@esq_sanders I can not give a fuck about Charlie Kirk and say Fuck Charlie Kirk without celebrating his murder. White Supremacist and Republicans are and have been some of the most insensitive people on earth and now they are acting like bitches because some people don’t care about his murder

1

0

59

Harold Thomas @HTakaHardTimes

10 months ago

@TheSalGreco You and I both know that if a group of African Americans had done what your so called trespassers did, their black asses would have been thrown under the jail and they definitely wouldn’t have been pardoned by the criminal posing as the President Of The United States Of America.

0

27

Harold Thomas @HTakaHardTimes

10 months ago

@TheSalGreco You lost me when you called the insurrectionist who assaulted cops, trespassers. That statement makes me wonder what type of Police Officer you were? You can’t pick and choose who you will enforce the law against and who you will let slide.

0

29

Harold Thomas @HTakaHardTimes

11 months ago

@esq_sanders Amen 🙏🏾

0

46

HTakaHardTimes retweeted

Eric Sanders, Esq.

@esq_sanders

11 months ago

Tomorrow, 37 newly hired Probationary Police Officers (PPOs) are being summoned to Lefrak City Plaza—not for routine onboarding, but for what appears to be a coercive meeting to “encourage” their resignation. The NYPD is reportedly invoking a so-called “faulty psychological assessment” as the basis for its actions—despite the fact that these same candidates were vetted, processed, and cleared through the department’s own hiring mechanisms. This orchestrated purge is not only unprecedented in scale but deeply alarming in its tactics. As I’ve written in previous blogs, particularly “The Fitness Farce: How Police Psychological Exams Are a Misnomer—and a Weapon” and “What Investigators Miss”, the NYPD’s use of psychological screening has long operated as a tool of exclusion, not protection. These evaluations often lack transparency, scientific rigor, and consistent standards—making them ripe for abuse. When wielded after the fact—post-appointment—they serve as a convenient pretext to purge individuals who may not conform to the department’s unspoken norms, identities, or politics. Worse, these 37 PPOs are not being afforded due process. There are no hearings, no formal charges, no opportunity to contest the alleged deficiencies. Instead, they are being railroaded into resignation under the guise of benevolent concern for their mental fitness—a manipulative tactic meant to sidestep legal liability while obscuring institutional bias. This episode underscores the systemic issues I’ve long raised: psychological reviews within the NYPD are neither neutral nor objective. They are used to launder bias, suppress dissent, and maintain control. Whether it’s silencing whistleblowers, punishing those with protected traits, or, as may be the case here, quietly ridding the department of “undesirables,” the misuse of psychological assessments is part of a broader pattern of institutional betrayal. We must ask: who ordered this sweep, and why now? Why were these candidates hired in the first place if they supposedly failed some undefined standard? And how many others have been silenced under similar pretenses, with no public record and no recourse? This isn’t mental health advocacy—it’s institutional manipulation masquerading as concern.

11

31

8

7

11K

Harold Thomas @HTakaHardTimes

11 months ago

@esq_sanders Let me guess, they are mostly minorities? The PBA should be outraged! What are they doing about this? I heard they all have been on patrol for over 7 months making arrest. So what is the job saying, they gave guns to 37 crazy people and let them play police for 7 months?

1

9

0

2K