Finally, the handwriting and signature on these letters are unmistakably consistent with one another, so no magical “seals”—or walruses, for that matter—are needed to verify anything.
As for the rest of the drivel you’ve come out with, it’s not even worth addressing. But if you’re determined to continue this public humiliation, I’ll happily oblige.
After all, I am the Habashi Slayer. 🤣🤣🤣
لعنة الله على الكاذبين
May Allah’s curse be upon the liars.
I knew you’d find it hard to cope, but this is Olympic-level coping. If it weren’t so utterly pathetic, I’d almost admire the commitment. This is genuinely the most embarrassing forgery attempt I’ve ever seen. A seven-year-old trying to forge a school report would produce something more convincing than this.
The “seals” you produced to do not exist on any of the original images—not on the image you originally posted, and not on the version from the https://t.co/zTazVQI2QQ website you copied it from, and not on the original letter I posted. You added them afterwards because, like your porno shaykh al-Harari, you are a Habashi mudallis who resorts to deception when the evidence is against you.
Secondly, I posted a photograph of an original letter—written in ink, on a folded sheet of paper—with no magical “seals” at the top or bottom.
Yet somehow, the copy of my letter that you’ve produced, which is nothing more than a scan of the letter I posted, has suddenly grown these miraculous “seals.”
So which is it? Did I somehow forge my own forgery, or are you admitting that you have the original forgery in your possession—making you the forger?
And if you supposedly have the original forged document, why are you posting a scan of it instead of simply photographing the original, exactly as I did?
Let’s see how hard you cope when you read the letter he wrote to al-Harari, rebuking him for his stance on the Ṣaḥābah 🤣
If al-Harari was “the most knowledgeable man on earth,” how did he make such a basic mistake that Shaykh ʿUthmān had to write him a letter telling him to stop slandering the Ṣaḥābah?
In the letter, he says that what he learned from his father and the scholars of those lands is that the Ṣaḥābah who fought ʿAlī رضي الله عنه did so based on ijtihād and are rewarded for it , which according to al-Harari is kufr.
So how are you using this “kāfir” as evidence that your shaykh was the most knowledgeable man on earth?
And nowhere in the letter you provided does it say al-Harari was the most knowledgeable on earth, let alone knowledgeable in his own area code 🤣
@Habashi_Ls@abuatiyyah_@HabashiSlayer I heard from Shaykh Abu Nasir this directly, and he accompanied shaykh Uthman in sulaymaniyah, you are only coping.
Al-Jurjānī is simply reproducing, what al-Āmidī wrote before him. If you want to understand either of them, you must first read Abkār al-Afkār. Clearly, you haven’t, because you’re relying on al-Hararī’s tadlīs of al-Zarkashī.
Here they are side by side. Al-Jurjānī is clearly repeating this from al-Āmidī. As you can see, in Abkār al-Afkār, al-Āmidī actually says, “many of our companions” (kathīrun min aṣḥābinā), not “most”—yet this is the wording that you and your mudallis shaykh continue to repeat. Instead of quoting al-Āmidī directly, your shaykh, al-Hararī, repeats the erroneous wording found in Tashnīf al-Masāmiʿ. This leaves only two possibilities: either he was not the meticulous muḥaqqiq you claim he was, or he knowingly engaged in tadlīs. In shāʾ Allāh, I will demonstrate why the latter is the case in another post.
Finally, I leave you with the words of Imām al-Sirhindī, addressing the words of al-Jurjānī and those like yourself who attribute fisq to the Companions of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ.
“contrary to what the extremists of the Rāfiḍah claimed that they are disbelievers, nor are they fussāq as some claimed and attributed to the commentator of al-Mawāqif regarding many of his companions.
And how could that be, when al-Ṣiddīqah, Ṭalḥah, and al-Zubayr were among the Companions — and Ṭalḥah and al-Zubayr had already fought at the Battle of the Camel with thirteen thousand fighters before Muʿāwiyah’s rebellion and their battles? Therefore, no Muslim would dare declare them fussāq, unless there is sickness in his heart and evil in his inner self”
In fact, Imām al-Baghdādī also makes this very distinction between the Ṣaḥābah and others. As such, it is not unique to al-Āmidī; rather, it is a principle found consistently throughout the works of the scholars, from Imām al-Baghdādī in Uṣūl al-Dīn to Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī in his Tuḥfat al-Muḥtāj. Ibn Ḥajar explicitly dispels this misconception by stating that whenever fisq or sin is mentioned in this context, it refers only to those who did not attain the level of ijtihād, which by definition excludes any sahabi
@hashimiyy_@abuatiyyah_ This Habashi is only repeating the tadlis of his sheikh alhabashiyyyyy, in fact this screenshot is directly from his sheikhs bible of slander of the sahaba
One of the heavyweights in the Ahbash is Sh Tariq Lahham. Here he is seen spewing his usual nonsense by claiming that one of the most respected Ashari Muhaqqiqs of our time; Sh Anas Sharfawi, is a Kafir who's advocating for Kufr.
Why? Simple because he's not a Takfeeri nut job.
@HasanAlBeiruti The ahbash are willing to sell out the Sunnis in Lebanon at the drop of a hat if it suits them politically and you know this, it’s only that the power has shifted away from iran and the hezb that they are trying to fix their image
@MAlkhyr85096 @HasanAlBeiruti لان الداعم الأساسي لفرقة الاحباش كان نظام الأسد الذي فعل الأفاعيل باهل طرابلس، وكم من أبناء طرابلس قتل وسجن وعذب بسبب تقارير الاحباش فيهم، وكم من مسجد غصب لدي الاحباش بدعم الردع السوري، أهل طرابلس معظمهم أشاعرة
‼️‼️Ahbash SUPPORT ISRAEL??
It DOESN’T get more BLATANT or DISGRACEFUL than this — men who claim to support ISLAM and SUNNISM standing shoulder to shoulder with ZIONISTS who openly oppose PALESTINE and support ISRAEL. How can you BETRAY your own UMMAH and still call yourselves MUSLIMS?
May Allah hold each boot licking Backstabber accountable.
#PalestineGenocide #FreePalestine