Constitutional Carry is now law in 29 of the 50 states, including Texas as of 2021.
Not only has it not given rise to more gun crime, but it’s worked out just fine in states that have passed it.
Some will try to paint this as “radical” but I call it following the Constitution.
“If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.”
“Obamacare will save you $2,500 a year.”
We’ve heard these lies before. We’re not falling for them again.
- Government: "You committed a crime."
- You: "What did I do?"
- Government: "You paid with cash. Three times. Large amounts."
- You: "Cash is legal."
- Government: "Legal, but suspicious."
- You: "Using money... as money... is suspicious?"
- Government: "Honest people use traceable payments."
- You: "Says who?"
- Government: "The people doing the tracing."
In Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF, the court threw out the NFA's registration and approval scheme for suppressors, SBRs, and SBSs. Form 1. Form 4. ATF wait period. NFA Registry. All gone.
And because we won, you win too. The ruling covers all Silencer Shop customers, current and future.
The court paused its own ruling for seven days to give the government time to appeal, and that pause can get extended.
Big thanks to everyone who donated to SSF and our partners in this fight: @GunOwners , @palmettoarmory , @silencerco , @btusallc , @2AFDN , and @FRACAction
In litigation, you play the hand you're dealt. The courts dictate how the Constitution is interpreted and what lines of argument are in play. That is the way it's supposed to work.
In the legislative branch, you get to stack the deck. You get to force your lawmakers to back away from laws you don't like by engaging and confronting them (and replacing them if they won't listen).
This is why it's not only a mistake to look to the courts to save you from gun control, it's also a cop-out and an abdication of responsibility. In America, we have government by the consent of the governed. That means the buck stops with the citizen. This means you.
I'm getting sick of the "just one life" argument being used for Flock cameras.
We gonna play that game. Public execution of killers, pedos and rapist with mandatory broadcast on all mediums, will save more than one life.
If I ever have to engage an active shooter with my carry pistol, I look forward to all the self-described gun experts criticizing my gun, shoes, shirt, hat, stance, ammo, number of hits or misses, the weather, the pants I have on, what kind of vehicle I drove that day, and what colored underwear I wore.
The anti-gunners would be more reasonable than most so-called " pro-gun " people.
He didn’t just save lives the other day in Idaho.
He will save lives for years to come.
Right now, countless would-be mass shooters are seeing this image and having second thoughts.
The uncertainty of who is carrying and who is trained is a deterrent.
Guns save lives.
There's so much negativity going around about this cat it's unreal. "Terrible training, his gun was sub par,why didn't he use cover, he didn't even hit the shooter, etc, etc...."
Y'all need to step back and reevaluate. Yes some things could have been done better, but this guy stepped out on the two way range and engaged in a gunfight. Just that act alone redirected the shooters attention off of killing, to self preservation. He should be celebrated for saving lives.