This intellectually desolate back and forth is civilisation-ending, as in, if it is permitted to go on long enough — it will just tear a functioning society into pieces.
What's more is that we often talk of alienation, albeit mostly in the context of ethnic enclaves or technology isolating people.
Yet the scene couldn't have been more carefully calibrated to elicit total repulsion to the average Brit if it had been manufactured in a lab.
Watching a well spoken gentleman make an eminently reasonable and uncontroversial point to be met with a wall of gurning and hectoring punctuated by clapping is intensely alienating.
The show is a humiliation ritual for the young British male, a society that loathes you on the one hand and yet regards itself as fully entitled to the contents of your bank account on the other.
This is not legitimate. Young men owe this monstrous circus of a society nothing at all — let alone signing up to go die in a ditch in Ukraine for them while they live in the lap of luxury on your dime at home.
This social contract is not yours, it's not mine, it has nothing to do with me or you. It has no value. It serves no purpose other than to disempower you and give your money away.
It deserves to be tossed in the great dustbin of history. If this is the Britain progressives want, you are on your own.
He also said in a speech that his Brahman Indian heritage was central to his identity.
Later, he gave us another speech stating the concept of a “heritage American” was absurd and unAmerican.
I’m proud of the average conservative voter who stopped their defending this guy
We’re changing the Republican Party
Imagine you're a child and you're made pregnant by a gang who took turns raping you and then finding out that the government relies on that gang for votes so refuses to launch even so much as an enquiry to get to the bottom of their offending.
And then they tell you to shut up for the sake of diversity.
If you admit that Rishi Sunak is not English, then you admit that the demographic vandalism inflicted on England can be reversed.
Everyone claiming that Sunak is English is trying to prevent the reversal of mass migration, from Windrush through the Boriswave.
For better or for worse, Sunak has become the avatar of mass migration. If you accept him as English, you accept your status as a dispossessed future minority, and therefore the end of your civilisation.
Like Kemi Badenoch, Rishi Sunak can never be a true heir of Alfred the Great. Only a usurper.
This is why the establishment is up in arms to defend him.
Labour MPs believe that subsidising private sector employment is a good thing.
This is nonsense. Taxpayers should not be engaging in corporate welfare and entrenching the low wage economy that has emerged as a result of excessive welfare and mass immigration.
Remigration will go a long way to bringing wages back to a liveable level. Where labour shortages emerge, we should focus on next generation robotics and other forms of automation which is an area Britain is lagging in precisely because we incentivise firms to hire cheap labour rather than make capital investments.
This is exactly right.
Universal suffrage has been a disaster for Western Civilization. Men, and especially male property owners, would NEVER vote for open borders, welfare for lazy parasites (so they can breed more of them), or leniency for even the worst criminals. We'd still have public hangings, and the crime rate would be a fraction. And women would be able to walk anywhere without fear, because potential rapists would be too afraid of the noose.
@tomhfh@Fiat__Justitia He is not white. Nationality (like other social phenomena) is a matter of collective belief. Nobody actually believes colored people are English or French etc. Hence the question “where are you really from?” Nigeria, Pakistan, etc.
Remind me why the government is running net migration in the hundreds of thousands when the economy is shedding hundreds of thousands of jobs and vacancies are at their lowest (outside of the pandemic) since 2014?
We have nearly one million NEETs, and millions more on out-of-work benefits who could and should be working. The establishment's case for immigration was always predicated on the economy suffering from labour shortages, yet right now we have a labour SURPLUS.
Viewing Britain as an economic zone rather than a homeland is something I reject, but even if you were to adopt the establishment mindset on mass migration, it wouldn’t make any sense in this economic environment.
Clearly, this is about something else: demographic, cultural, and political change, rather than "growing the economy."
When our politicians are on trial in the not-too-distant future, they'll have the opportunity to explain exactly what they were up to.
Why is there:
an Indian community in Tennessee
which owns land 1/3 the size of Knoxville
allowed to only grant lots to other people (Indians) involved in their Hindu religious programs?
Why are they advertising American greencards for other Indian investors?