hipotatam

I block most who follow me.

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@arifkizilyalin @_UrVeKa_ Simoviç’in eline ve armasına bakın

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@arifkizilyalin @_UrVeKa_ Çünkü yz kullanıyor resimlerde

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@aybaltaci Bir keresinde basın onu tuzağa düşürüp babasıyla karşılaştırmıştı o da kalkıp gitmişti galiba

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@BruceDMaiden You are definitely caught somewhere in time there…

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@90sfootball Mc something

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@TiMosbetterhalf @AMAZlNGNATURE Rested for too long

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@_UrVeKa_ YZ yüzleri bozmuş

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@rijedakk @GullitR Turkish football improved alot especially during 1992-2002 but then stagnating since

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@hskizilcik @SzassTam SI misafir editörlüğü yapıyorum. Bir yazar bir sürü benim ve diğer editörlerin makalelerine atıf yapmış. Çıkarın bunları öyle yollayın diye geri gönderdim :)

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@umuttgunerr Sahte resim

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@StuartRoss64 @Peal8888 That’s a spaghettified grame souness

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@_UrVeKa_ Ali sami yen böyle değildi ki

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@chnysl Finlandiyadan bi tek terasbetoni gercek metaldi. Stratovarius sonata arctica en son 2000de falab dinlemisimdir. Cheezy euro pop metal. Nighwish ilk ciktiginda ilgincti ama o da bir esprisi yok. Geriye bogurenler kaliyor zaten

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@Spottingthespot @Damia_Barcelo I think this specific incident looks alot like fraud. I was just saying that technically simply the said relationship does not imply unethical processes. And whoever detected the issue should be able to look at the history and find clearer evidence of fraud.

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@Spottingthespot @Damia_Barcelo Ok if the reviewers were former or current co-authors then it is clearly not ok. For editor I think it depends if it was handled as for any other person.

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@Spottingthespot @Damia_Barcelo Also if current co-authorship is an issue then past co-authorship also should be. This would mean people can’t submit papers to journals edited by their former co-authors or colleagues. Why not check if all was done ethically by looking how it was processed?

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@Spottingthespot @Damia_Barcelo The editor may comply 100% with the referee decisions. For instance reject if there is one rejection from, say, 3 referee decisions. This could mitigate and perhaps nullify the ethical problem created due to the editor being a current co-author.

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@Spottingthespot @Damia_Barcelo I think it should be very easy to check by looking at how the submission was handled. If it was sent to referees unrelated to the authors and if their decision was upheld l without the editor’s interference then it is physically not different than any other review process.

[hipotatam @HamdiTavuk]

@Spottingthespot @Damia_Barcelo So the editor did not review himself but invited unconnected referees and respected their decisions? If so it shouldn’t be a problem. The ongoing co-authorship can be problematic but not more than past co-authorship.