The Military all around the World are about to activate the Emergency Alert System.
Internet will be switched off.
Governments in all natuons are about to be shut down.
Please listen - 2minutes- and share widely.
Planned test is for November 17th - perhaps it is real. Prepare and anchor yourselves in peace and calm.
The only way to deal with Tyranny is Military and it has been planned for decades.
Share this info far and wide so people can get a grip on what is going prior to the darkness which MUST happen so the criminals have no comms while the military do. We’ll be switched on to the new system in their timing.
We are about to be delivered from Evil.
Stay prayed up!
I love you all!
🚨 They said the BLACKOUT would happen on November 17th.
What if it already STARTED?
The internet is breaking. Outlook, Teams, Azure, Gmail, AWS, Cloudflare, Zoom, Steam, X, Facebook.
130,000 reports for Outlook alone.
And it's days before GTA 6 drops.
Were the conspiracy theorists right all along?
@grok what tf is GOING on?
@AkademiksTV I like how women like this act like their significant other fucked them over by being successful lmao. Hes literally given you generational wealth and beautiful family yet somehow not fulfilled… wtf is wrong with people
@AkademiksTV BTW I love the independence of her being but the way she saying it sounds wrong. Nothing wrong of trying to find a profound challenge and goals but she sounds like Steph has oppressed her from doing so much more.
@AkademiksTV Women speak 🗣️ in codes and let's look and listen to what she doesn't say as to actually does. She said "she "loves being a mom" but I got to question because she doesn't say it. Do you love being a wife? To me she sounds self centered and an egotistical person.
I feel for Steph Curry.
It cannot be easy watching your wife become the punchline of so many lewd jokes.
And while I understand his instinct to defend her, I wanted to address something that has bothered me about Ayesha Curry's public conduct over the past two years, and why I believe Steph, despite his admirable intentions, has fundamentally misunderstood the criticism.
First, a few things worth establishing.
I don't believe men should control their partners' career decisions, dictate their ambitions, or police their public speaking engagements. I'm also a film director who has directed 13 films, so I'm well aware that actors sometimes have to kiss other actors. It's part of the profession. Anyone scandalized by that fact probably doesn't understand the profession very well.
But my criticism has very little to do with the kiss itself.
It has to do with something considerably more troubling: the increasingly blurred distinction between autonomy and vanity, between ambition and envy, and between the pursuit of one's own greatness and the resentment of someone else's.
And despite Steph's valiant efforts to defend his wife, I suspect he may look back on this period ten years from now and feel rather differently.
Let's start with the film.
Part of the reason people are mocking it is that it looks like AI slop in human form. A lazy script, dreadful lighting, uninspired cinematography, recycled plotlines, and acting that oscillates between bland and genuinely uncomfortable.
Anyone insisting that Ayesha Curry deserves to be taken seriously as an actor on the strength of this performance needs to have their head examined.
But the film itself is almost beside the point.
To me, it represents a recurring theme in Ayesha Curry's public persona over the past two years: vanity masquerading as autonomy.
And there's an important distinction between the two.
On Red Table Talk, Ayesha spoke about wanting more male attention and validation, particularly in the context of the enormous attention her husband receives from women.
Now, I don't pretend to know the inner workings of their marriage. But I do find the psychology of that admission revealing.
Because beneath the desire for validation lies a potentially destructive belief: that the admiration your partner receives somehow diminishes your own worth.
That love is a competition. That attention is a finite resource. That one person's ascent necessarily represents another person's descent.
Nietzsche might have recognized in this the beginnings of ressentiment: the tendency to measure oneself against another person's success, and eventually to experience that success not as something to celebrate, but as an indictment of one's own inadequacy.
And this is where I believe the distinction between genuine independence and performative independence becomes critical.
On Call Her Daddy, Ayesha spoke about her ambitions to be a career woman and how marriage and motherhood altered the trajectory she had imagined for herself.
There is nothing inherently wrong with that admission. Plenty of people struggle to reconcile the lives they imagined with the lives they ultimately chose.
But when placed alongside her earlier comments, a recurring sentiment begins to emerge:
"I'm more than just Steph Curry's wife."
And of course she is.
But here's the question: Why does being Steph Curry's wife need to be framed as something to overcome?
Why must proximity to greatness become a burden rather than a blessing?
Why must an identity be established in opposition to the very person one has chosen to love?
There is something profoundly unhealthy about treating your partner's extraordinary achievements as an obstacle to your own self-realization.
And I suspect this is why so many people, including those in the so-called manosphere, have rallied to Steph's defense.
Continued below ⬇️⬇️⬇️
I’m telling y’all, the government is setting us up for something bigger, and not in a good way. There’s a reason they’re telling us to prepare for 72 hours without essential services. There’s a reason nobody can find a job, why everything is becoming unaffordable, why people can barely afford to eat or keep a roof over their heads. There’s a reason so many people are struggling just to survive. I’m not saying I know exactly what’s coming, but I refuse to believe none of this is connected. Something bigger is happening, and I genuinely don’t think people are prepared for it. The government knows more than we do, and I think we’re all too busy trying to survive to even question what’s going on.
@TheModelManSam Threw a punch for no reason whatsoever, close game he's playing well yeah let throw a soft ass punch and get thrown out. No brain or FD made the call. NBA at its best it illustrates 2026 NBA betting smh
Instead of reacting emotionally or impulsively, try a smarter approach.
Ask this one calm, strategic question:
✅ “May I understand how this information relates to the requirements or performance expectations of this role?”
That single question does three important things:
1. It keeps the conversation professional
2. It protects your boundaries
3. It signals confidence and awareness
If HR says it’s about availability or flexibility:
✅ “I’m fully able to meet the role’s expectations regarding time, travel, and deliverables.”
If HR says it’s about long-term commitment:
✅ “I’m committed to delivering value and growing within a role where performance is the key measure.”
See the shift?
From a personal question
- to a role-focused discussion
- without confrontation or disrespect
You’re not being difficult.
You’re being professional.
If this helps, retweet it so more people can learn!