Hanzo @Hanzo_H_ - Twitter Profile

Pierre Poilievre came to Calgary to sell nostalgia. Alberta needs reality. Pierre gave a polished speech about Canadian unity. He talked about veterans, prairie farms, the Stampede, and the promise of Confederation. It was emotional, patriotic, well delivered. But it did not answer the central question: Why should Alberta stay in a country structurally built to extract from us? Pierre says Alberta’s problems are “easily fixable.” They are not. If they were, they would have been fixed decades ago. Alberta has voted Conservative, sent MPs to Ottawa, stayed loyal, and paid the bills. And still, from 2007 to 2022, Albertans sent roughly $244.6 billion more to Ottawa than we received back. That is not a temporary policy mistake. That is the business model of Confederation. Pierre frames the problem as bad Liberal policy. But the deeper problem is the structure of Canada itself. The Liberals need Alberta’s money. The Conservatives need Alberta politically. Without Alberta, the Conservative path to government becomes almost impossible. Pierre can sympathize with Alberta’s grievances, but he cannot confront the solution. The Conservative Party is not designed to represent Alberta first. It is designed to win federal elections. That means Alberta’s views must always be softened and repackaged for Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic Canada. Pierre says we can fix this in Ottawa. But equalization is constitutionally entrenched. Dismantling it would require constitutional change, and the provinces that profit from Alberta’s wealth would have to agree to give it up. Why would they? That is the trap. Alberta is told to work harder, pay more, sacrifice more, and then politely ask the rest of Canada to stop taking so much. That is not partnership. That is dependency dressed up as unity. Pierre said we should “lock arms” with other provinces. But Alberta has locked arms for decades. We locked arms while our energy sector was attacked, our pipelines blocked, and our wealth redistributed. At some point, “lock arms” just means “stay in line.” Pierre says Alberta needs different policies, not a different country. But Alberta independence exists because more Albertans have realized Ottawa is not the disease. Ottawa is the symptom. The disease is Confederation itself. A system where Alberta creates the wealth, carries the risk, takes the abuse, and still has no power to stop the extraction. A system where our future depends on convincing voters thousands of kilometres away to develop our economy. The issue is not whether Albertans love their neighbours, respect veterans, or appreciate the sacrifices that built this country. We do. The issue is whether the country they built still works for Alberta. The answer is increasingly obvious. It does not. Pierre asked Albertans not to give up on Canada. But what if Canada gave up on Alberta first? What if Confederation has been replaced by a system where Alberta’s role is to produce, pay, and be quiet? That is why this movement is growing. Not because Albertans hate Canada. But because Albertans have learned from experience. Federal promises expire. Respect for Alberta is always negotiable. Conservative governments slow the damage but do not fix the structure. Liberal governments see Alberta as a revenue source. The rest of Canada will always vote in its own interest. So Alberta must finally do the same. Pierre came to make the case for a stronger Alberta within a united Canada. But he never explained how Alberta escapes the fiscal trap, how equalization ends, or why the provinces profiting from it would ever vote to stop. The speech was beautiful. The argument was empty. Alberta does not need another emotional appeal to stay. Alberta needs power. Alberta needs control over its wealth, its economy, its resources, and its future. If Canada’s structure makes that impossible, the answer is not another federal promise. The answer is independence.

RiseOfAlberta's tweet photo. Pierre Poilievre came to Calgary to sell nostalgia. Alberta needs reality.

Pierre gave a polished speech about Canadian unity.

He talked about veterans, prairie farms, the Stampede, and the promise of Confederation.

It was emotional, patriotic, well delivered.

But it did not answer the central question:

Why should Alberta stay in a country structurally built to extract from us?

Pierre says Alberta’s problems are “easily fixable.”

They are not.

If they were, they would have been fixed decades ago.

Alberta has voted Conservative, sent MPs to Ottawa, stayed loyal, and paid the bills.

And still, from 2007 to 2022, Albertans sent roughly $244.6 billion more to Ottawa than we received back.

That is not a temporary policy mistake.

That is the business model of Confederation.

Pierre frames the problem as bad Liberal policy.

But the deeper problem is the structure of Canada itself.

The Liberals need Alberta’s money.

The Conservatives need Alberta politically.

Without Alberta, the Conservative path to government becomes almost impossible.

Pierre can sympathize with Alberta’s grievances, but he cannot confront the solution.

The Conservative Party is not designed to represent Alberta first.

It is designed to win federal elections.

That means Alberta’s views must always be softened and repackaged for Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic Canada.

Pierre says we can fix this in Ottawa.

But equalization is constitutionally entrenched.

Dismantling it would require constitutional change, and the provinces that profit from Alberta’s wealth would have to agree to give it up.

Why would they?

That is the trap.

Alberta is told to work harder, pay more, sacrifice more, and then politely ask the rest of Canada to stop taking so much.

That is not partnership.

That is dependency dressed up as unity.

Pierre said we should “lock arms” with other provinces.

But Alberta has locked arms for decades.

We locked arms while our energy sector was attacked, our pipelines blocked, and our wealth redistributed.

At some point, “lock arms” just means “stay in line.”

Pierre says Alberta needs different policies, not a different country.

But Alberta independence exists because more Albertans have realized Ottawa is not the disease.

Ottawa is the symptom.

The disease is Confederation itself.

A system where Alberta creates the wealth, carries the risk, takes the abuse, and still has no power to stop the extraction.

A system where our future depends on convincing voters thousands of kilometres away to develop our economy.

The issue is not whether Albertans love their neighbours, respect veterans, or appreciate the sacrifices that built this country.

We do.

The issue is whether the country they built still works for Alberta.

The answer is increasingly obvious.

It does not.

Pierre asked Albertans not to give up on Canada.

But what if Canada gave up on Alberta first?

What if Confederation has been replaced by a system where Alberta’s role is to produce, pay, and be quiet?

That is why this movement is growing.

Not because Albertans hate Canada.

But because Albertans have learned from experience.

Federal promises expire. Respect for Alberta is always negotiable. Conservative governments slow the damage but do not fix the structure. Liberal governments see Alberta as a revenue source. The rest of Canada will always vote in its own interest.

So Alberta must finally do the same.

Pierre came to make the case for a stronger Alberta within a united Canada.

But he never explained how Alberta escapes the fiscal trap, how equalization ends, or why the provinces profiting from it would ever vote to stop.

The speech was beautiful.

The argument was empty.

Alberta does not need another emotional appeal to stay.

Alberta needs power.

Alberta needs control over its wealth, its economy, its resources, and its future.

If Canada’s structure makes that impossible, the answer is not another federal promise.

The answer is independence.

157

1K

449

84

24K

Hanzo @Hanzo_H_

8 days ago

@CoryBMorgan Whoa.. I think you have to use ground penetrating radar first, make sure nothing historical is buried there.

0

68

Hanzo @Hanzo_H_

8 days ago

@MarcMillerVM Handing our own money as scraps back to us won’t even make a dent in the inflation pain your bad polices have created.

0

4

Hanzo @Hanzo_H_

10 days ago

@KatKanada_TM They are part of the elite political establishment, unaccountable and untouchable. Senate is voting to make any questioning of residential school denial a crime

0

36