Harald Franzen

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@wierdduk Sorry Wierd... Lidewij de Vos

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@BumblebeeJoe @WenStru @Politie Ik ben het helaas eens met @BumblebeeJoe

Vroeger was dat anders. Dan zou ik trots geweest zijn op mijn kind. Nu begrijp ik dat de politie er vooral is om gewone burgers zo agressief mogelijk in elkaar te rammen.
Mijn respect voor de politie is ver onder nul.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@elonmusk As my dad was in the military, stationed in Germany, I got to see that "wall" a number of times. Some of my family got over before it was built.
It's part of my history and heritage

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@DVanLangenhove @EuropeElects The only problem being "them" knowing this too.
So "they" - with all the money they can get there hands on, politically corrupted judges, NGO's financed by who knows - will do everything in their power to prevent the people from expressing themselves.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@Vlam180 @DVanLangenhove That sounds great, but at every update, they'll switch it back on. Google does the same.
And who wants to spend hours every week to find the very well hidden settings to switch this type of thing off? Exactly.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@EricSpracklen Yup. I discussed "Covid" with a nurse-friend and we said "genocide" in January 2020.
No vax here.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@Symphony_res Terechte vraag die zich hier in Frankrijk ook iedereen afvraagt.
Want dat het geen toeval is, daarover is men het wel eens.
Ecoterroristen die de klimaatverandering willen bewijzen? Vastgoedtypes? Copy-cat of de regering zelf (crisis!)? Roept u maar.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@LaKarub @wierdduk @demo_demo_nl Mocht je het over mij hebben; ik heb alles behalve een kutleven 😂

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

To say humans are adding carbon to the Earth is a physical impossibility.

What is actually happening is a change in 'where' the carbon is stored. We are told humanity is inflating the Earth's carbon budget, but geology tells us this kitchen cupboard has been sealed shut for billions of years.

We're not baking a 'bigger cake' by adding more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere; the planet is simply shifting its ingredients from the subterranean vault back into the biological engine — a state the Earth has vibrantly occupied for the vast majority of its history.

The attempt to regulate the breath of cattle and the outputs of agriculture is an attempt to regulate the eternal nature of the cake recipe itself.

Think of Earth's carbon reservoir as being split into distinct pantries: the atmosphere, the oceans, the soil plus every living thing (ants, antelopes, humans and forests). Carbon moves between these constantly. When you exhale, or a tree rots, it stays in this active loop. It is not adding a crumb.

Carbon that was taken out of active circulation millions of years ago and locked away in rock — is lithified in limestone, oil, coal and shale. When we use hydrocarbon fuels, we aren't creating any 'new' carbon; we're digging up carbon from the Deep Vault of time and throwing it back into the biological mix.

The hothouse worlds of the Miocene (and the Eocene and Cambrian) are the ultimate geological anchor. During the Miocene (roughly 5 to 23 million years ago), CO₂ levels were significantly higher than today, and the planet didn't experience runaway greenhouse death. Instead, lush ecosystems and massive biodiversity flourished.

Why? Because the cake was just being distributed differently. The atmosphere held a larger slice of the total carbon, driving a warmer, wetter, hyper-productive biosphere. The rocks prove that the system can handle vastly higher atmospheric carbon loads because that is the baseline state of a vibrant Earth. We treat global carbon accounting like a corporate ledger, but the largest active reservoir on Earth — the deep ocean — is virtually a black box. It's invisible to us.

The deep ocean holds roughly 45 times more carbon than the atmosphere. A microscopic shift in ocean temperature, deep-sea currents, or upwelling zones can release or absorb more CO₂ than humanity could ever dream of emitting.

Yet, we pretend we can calculate the global budget down to the decimal point based on surface surmising.

By the laws of the 'single cake' of CO₂, livestock and agriculture are completely carbon-neutral cycles.
A blade of grass plucks CO₂ out of the air. The cow eats the grass, processes the carbon, then releases it.

Within years, that carbon is right back in the atmosphere to grow more grass. It's a closed loop. No carbon leaves the vault.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@TRobinsonNewEra Strictly speaking, they are called the "De Weerdt" inlands and they should be Dutch 🤫
We'll leave you and the Argentinians bicker about it, but maybe some day there's going to be a knock on the door 😉

👋

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@AJuijn Laat dit de PvdD maar niet zien 🫣

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@Yorienvdh Dat lijkt mij een vrij accurate weergave van de realiteit. Helaas.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@brink_marion @gewoonmerels Het défilé heeft nadrukkelijk een functie en prima zo.

Die WEF-poppetjes en de corrupte doorgesnoven Ukrainse dictator (want dat is hij) en zijn Nazi-soldaatjes zijn een smet op het défilé.
En ik vermoed dat 80+% van de Franse bevolking dat met me eens is.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@oudenkerk99471 @jpaternotte @RobJetten Nou, daar verschillen we dan over van mening.
Vanaf het moment dat RU overschakelde van de mislukte "shock & awe" naar "war of attrition", was de strijd beslecht.
En niet in het voordeel van UK.

De voortdurende propaganda in het westen verandert niets aan de realiteit.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@SanderSassen Dit soort ethische kwesties kennen nooit een eenduidig helder antwoord.

Mijn perceptie op de casus die jij beschrijft: nee, dit gaat veel te ver.

Let op: ik ben beslist niet categorisch tegen abortus en euthanasie, maar dit gaat mij persoonlijk te ver

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@oudenkerk99471 @jpaternotte @RobJetten Da's niet knap. Da's Russische tactiek die ze al bij Napoleon toepassen.
In het begin probeerden ze het aan te pakken zoals de Amerikanen dat doen; "shock & awe". Failure. En dus zijn ze teruggevallen op oude betrouwbare tactiek: de vijand stukje bij beetje "opeten".

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@JuisteAntwoord De Judas Alliantie? Nee, dank u.

[Harald Franzen @HaraldFranzen68]

@gewoonmerels Dit was stukken beter:
https://t.co/PiKuw9dDHT