@Schickrateez@HeWhoHasNoName@AndrewPerpetua Money stopped Biden from sending a bunch of tanks. Also at the time they weren't the MOST needed piece of the puzzle. They certainly would've helped but say he sent a shit ton more abrams and then had to cut out ATACMS or Patriots, would that have made sense? Probably not.
@Schickrateez@HeWhoHasNoName@AndrewPerpetua Mmm not entirely accurate. While aid did get approved eventually in April of 2024, which then accelerated the deliveries again, there was a significant slow down due to republicans purposely stonewalling funds for aid deliveries.
@Schickrateez@HeWhoHasNoName@AndrewPerpetua You're not going to believe this and it sounds completely crazy BUT ... tanks cost MONEY .. guess who is in charge of money for foreign affairs. (Hence the "even if he wanted to")
@AllwhichIam@MeidasTouch Bub.. it's not an accident. They're insider trading ALL this shit.
Bought beef stocks I'm sure, release numbers sell, short them and then oops 90% correction, sell again. Repeat with every fucking sector.
@Schickrateez@HeWhoHasNoName@AndrewPerpetua Thanks for making my point. The reason is checks and balances, its what our country was founded on.
Congress and the executive branch. You should read up how each has say in foreign policy.
Its partially the reason why we aren't in a full out war with Iran currently.
@Schickrateez@HeWhoHasNoName@AndrewPerpetua Yeah, that's not how that was worded but that's fine, again, you guys read one thing and make it your narrative and sticking point. You might want to reread what was ACTUALLY in the bill vs what you heard on fox news.
@Schickrateez@HeWhoHasNoName@AndrewPerpetua You understand Biden can't infinitely send the entirety of the US armory even if that's exactly what he wanted to do without the rest of our government right? or are you purposely ignoring that fact to fit the narrative?