Dear corporate dems, I'm sorry to inform you that when you say Hillary won popular vote to prove your point this is not an extenuating but an aggravating, 'cause nobody in history lost so many delegates getting so many votes. Neither an idiot like Trump would've been able.
@Jamesreilly65@Jeggit You said "how can we carry Independence without converting "No" voters?"
But why should voters vote for Independence if they can still confortably vote against it avoiding every possible Republican option?
@Jeggit@Jamesreilly65 I think the question is simple: why should "No" voters vote Yes if they can still having the monarchy voting "No"?
This is like when US Dems say we must punt an anti-abortion candidate to win in Texas. Results? Texans keep voting anti-abortion Republicans.
@Shedhoarder27@Jeggit Following the thread I've just read a lot of anecdotal and not a data to prove republicanism is a losing strategy. What if monarchy does care just to unionists?
@Shedhoarder27@Jeggit -------> Second because they could just say: what's the difference between having an independent Scotland with the Queen of England and an United Kingdom with the Queen herself?
@Shedhoarder27@Jeggit Forgive me my intrusion, I read Jason tweet and all disagreement about him, but I don't think saying "let's do independence and after we see" could be so achieving. First, because not assuming a position could be seen a trick by "monarchists" ------>