Harrik Shamir

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@rogerlaughed @WWE So you take the word without justifiable proof. Until they provide sufficient evidence of text messages from Brock himself. Not Vince. Then your blind following the words of people. Which can be taken as heresay. The things about Vince is true. because there is proof.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@rogerlaughed @WWE Thats far from the truth. Before claiming truth. Fact check. He was named. Not proven evidence of any text messages or photos from grant showing any suspicious behavior from Brock. You take someones word to be truth without doing a thorough study.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@Tim_Roquette You can say that. But when inconsistent evidence shows otherwise. It shows your blind following. No evidence of any text messages shown from Brock to Grant. No text no photos. Nothing. Henceforth lack of consistent evidence. Do your study before you think yourself as a lawyer.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@oralcarter He was mentioned. Doesnt equate to evidence of him actually participating. Also. No evidence of text messages from grant shown from Brock. Shows inconsistencies in your accusations.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@JaKouzzi @JaKouzzi Not true. There is zero proof of any text messages sent or replied shown from the accusers side in regards to Brock. You should do more research before blind following. Unless you can provide evidence otherwise.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@davemeltzerWON In all honesty. I have looked at it like this. There was no evidence of text messages from Brock Lesnar shown. Only text from Vince. A mere mention of a name and people blind follow into cancellation. Fact remains. No evidence shown of Messages from Brock. Innocent

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@WWE @BrockLesnar #Janelgrant #BrockLesnar Innocent until proven guilty. Alleged photos of text messages. Was showing Vince McMahon. Not Brock Lesnar. Vince is the wrongun. No doubt. Until there is verifiable photos of proven text messages sent by Brock Lesnar. I say innocent.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@Husband69761340 @ClownBall9 Bro. I keep asking these people. Show concrete proof from brocks phone. or even text messages sent from Brock. there is not a single proof. Yet folks are blind Following.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@tega1x @ClownBall9 So a mere mention by such and such. Is grounds for him to be guilty. is there proof of text messages from him? or is it text from another person mentioning his name. It seems you like to blind follow folks without asking for concrete evidence.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@DMM2099 @Metaworldonline Bro. They have not even shown text messages from Brocks phone. or even text from him. I stand by what I say, Until sufficient proof is given through text or videos that says brock lesnar in front of me. They have lied on his name. Vince on the other hand. yes. He is guilty.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@WWEJimRoss I mean. that is the facts of the matter. there is no proof of text messages neither videos. People will just blind follow.

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@Tommy_Payne03 @FinalASSASSlN The problem is your blind to the system. Whatever the system says, you tend to follow. Vince McMahon is the one proven to be a wrongun via text messages. Brock on the other hand. There is no text messages from him or photos. So continue blind following. And I dont Even like WWE

[Harrik Shamir @HarrikSham35170]

@WorldOfMadnX @FinalASSASSlN @viewsfromthelow And how do you know that Sir. based on text messages not from Brock Lesnars phone. But from Vinces. Yes Vince McMahon is a wrongun. He can pee off. but the one you should be angry at is Vince. Until there is proof of messages from Brock himself. innocent proven