@PBDsPodcast I like the discussion about the death penalty however I disagree with the live stream idea. I support the death penalty in cases where murder is committed however I believe live streaming it will give anti-death penalty people ammunition to fight the punishment.
GATOR CHOMP: @TheDemocrats head down to the Florida swamp to condemn the state's new massive migrant detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Lawmakers blasted the @realDonaldTrump administration over the "appalling" conditions they saw and the "cages" where illegal aliens would be processed.
@Rahmon83@realDonaldTrump Trump never lost the attention in 2020, and as far as ownership of the straight, you are delusional. It sounds as if trump owns real estate inside your head. This is just my opinion, though. 🤷
Typical spoiled athlete who thinks he is allowed to decide what laws he wants to abide by. Who cares what he thinks. Next time, roll your window and be polite.
Tyreek Hill is demanding a Miami-Dade police officer be fired after he was detained.
Body camera footage shows Hill arguing with officers when told to roll down his window and get out of the vehicle.
Who was in the wrong?
READ: https://t.co/4Qmo6LG0Qt
I agree that the left wing media has always controlled these debates. It's always 3 against one in these debates. Republicans should never agree to another debate from this point on until things change.
Trump says if he does a second debate on Fox News, he no longer would want Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum to moderate.
Instead, he’d want Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and/or Jesse Watters as moderators.
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias."
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."
@RepDanCrenshaw Crenshaw is the worst. He did all he could to bury EddieGallagher, who was supposed to be a brother in arms. Gallagher was an American hero.