HastySnack

poison deliciousness ☠️

[HastySnack @HastySnack]

@RealSpikeCohen @Casselberry_FLA 2060, your air permit has expired and you have 24 hours to renew it or drones will be sent to your home to put a plastic bag over your head… for your safety.

[Global Dissident @GlobalDiss]

🚨🇬🇧 Keir Starmer says he’ll “carry on with what he was elected to do”

Britain NEVER voted for mass surveillance, open borders, or two-tier policing.

No wonder his approval is at 20%. The entire country HATES him.

[Darren of Plymouth @DarrenPlymouth]

ARTICLE 19 - Universal Declaration of Human Rights

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

Keir Starmer has no legal authority to implement a social media ban.

Where are the human rights lawyers?

Oh wait… Starmer is one.

[HastySnack @HastySnack]

@harrymack One of the most talented people on this earth. Harry, you deserve so much more recognition, even though you already get a lot. True talent.

[C3 @C_3C_3]

Those pushing censorship are never the good guys.

Never.

[Reem Ibrahim @ReemAmirIbrahim]

Everyone is saying that 90% of parents support a ban on under-16s from accessing social media in the UK.

It’s actually just 90% of parents who decided to respond to the consultation (not a representative sample).

And they weren’t given an option to say no! Insanity!

[Taya Bass @travelingflying]

RFK Jr: “People are going to jail for Twitter posts in England.”

Joe Rogan: “12,000 people in the last year.”

RFK Jr: “It is a dictatorship.”

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

The social ban on under 16s is the diametric opposite of concern for kids welfare. So many teenagers rely on social media to communicate with their friends in the evenings. To take this away from them is vindictive.

If Starmer wants to effectively clean up inappropriate content on social media then he should discuss this with the social media companies rather than punish teenagers from communicating with their friends.

Starmer is once again using a virtue smokescreen to try and get what he really wants - a pathway to digital ID on social media - including adult verification. He is being horrendously manipulative here. And how dare he use the safety of children as the bait towards government controlled digital ID. Absolutely shameful.

[Pete North @FUDdaily]

"We've decided that you plebs being online, sharing news and exchanging your thoughts is a threat to our stranglehold on power, so we're going to close down your access to information and take away your right to anonymity in the name of protecting children, while also assuming total control over what your children are subjected to"

You cannot hate these people enough.

[Syntheticus Humanitus @TheChaosWeeber]

Then don’t give your kids a smartphone. Done.

Im not giving corporations my ID online just so you can feel better.

[David Vance @DavidVance]

So Putin is getting gay Ukrainian rentboys to commit arson against Starmer? And they expect us to believe this?

[Vincent Vandeputte @VincentVandep8]

Enkele maanden geleden wilde Starmer een verplichte Digitale ID invoeren.

De Britten kwamen massaal in opstand en het plan verdween in de koelkast.

Nu komt diezelfde Starmer met verplichte leeftijdsverificatie.

En kijk: minder protest, maar het eindstation blijft hetzelfde…

Want om iemands leeftijd te verifiëren, moet uiteindelijk iemands identiteit worden geverifieerd.

De verpakking is veranderd maar het doel is hetzelfde gebleven.

Eens die digitale ID er is, is het totalitaire hek van de dam.

[Alex Fairfax @Alex_Fairfax06]

“What’s my approval rating?”

- It’s bad Mr Prime Minister. It’s -43. It’s…it’s in the mud.

“Could it get lower?”

- I mean anything COULD happen but realistically-

“Kill the ponies.”

- Wha-

“The ponies. The cute little ponies. Kill them.”

- Sir, they’re endangered

“Fuck ‘em. Make the call.”

[CRG @MacroCRG]

here's what will happen.

- u16 ban passes, platforms must verify all ages

- kids use VPNs, government bans VPNs

- age verification infrastructure already exists, its scope gets broader, more invasive, more extreme

- Online Safety Act forces backdoors into encrypted messaging, E2E encryption dies, gov can read everything you ever send

- CBDC rolls out, your internet passport and financial passport become the same document

- anonymous accounts posting "wrongthink" are now identifiable + prosecutable

- the generation that grows up with this doesn't remember it being any other way

- George Orwell was right about everything

- it's over

[Mark Attwood @MarkAttwood]

Reminder

[Silkie Carlo @silkiecarlo]

Don’t take it from me.

Take it from one of the internet’s greatest pioneers @jimmy_wales

[C3 @C_3C_3]

The Left is pushing for identification to use the internet while pushing for no identification to vote.

Think about that.

[Mrs Millicent: Whimsy mode ✝️♿ 🏳️‍🌈 @MillieCheesey]

"90% support it"

Yeah in the same way dictators "win" elections - its a made up stat; the survey was publicly available and there was NO way to say no lol

[Sarah McLaughlin @sarahemclaugh]

People *need* to understand this: the under-16 bans hit adults too.

Whether you’re 15 or 55, your ability to speak freely and anonymously online is at risk.

This. Isn’t. Just. About. Teens.

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨 BREAKING: It has been revealed that the public consultation data Keir Starmer is using to promote his social media ban did NOT have an ‘against’ option