@ChadimirPoutine The problem is that some would say that he helped get MC elected by his 51st state rhetoric which led MC to play on the fears of his idiotic voter base and they fell for it hook, line and sinker.
@PiotrRetardo@TitaniumGoldBC@FoodProfessor If Libs had made better‑informed decisions over the past 11 yrs, we might not be dealing with the consequences we’re facing now. When an electorate keeps a govt in power through a decade of deteriorating outcomes, criticism of that pattern is not only predictable, it’s warranted.
@TmsFleming@SunstrumPaul@acoyne Fed enviro policies undermined investor confidence to the point that private firms could no longer justify continuing with the TM. The only reason the project was completed is because the fed govt had to buy it after its own rules pushed private investment out. Facts matter.
@intell59@Reil76 Completely false. No business case for a new pipeline” is not an inherent market truth — it is the direct result of policy‑driven uncertainty, regulatory delay, and cost inflation that distort the economics. When capital is prevented from investing, the absence of private 1/2
@junonewscom@kris_sims The stupidity in Canada is real. Is it any wonder why out country is so screwed up when we allow morons like this to have a voice?
@FidelisLobo@FreeCanadian6@mario4thenorth You can continue to spew the same nonsense about Pierre being a 20 year politician but it won't change the facts that our economy is failing under 11 yrs of Liberal rule. Uninformed voting has it's consequences.
@johnnylightnin@mario4thenorth@DimitrisSoudas He was wrong and I would say that at the time he said it he didn't envision a government that would be so corrupt that they would bribe enough MP's to cross the floor to give them a majority that they were not able to attain at the ballot box.
@TolerantParadox@BlueStateGrump@jkenney Actually you're statement is false. Refer to the Clarity Act. The Clarity Act is a federal law (S.C. 2000, c. 26) that sets the legal conditions under which the Govt of Canada would negotiate the secession of a province, requiring both a clear referendum question and a clear 1/2
@GaryScotianNS It's hard to say. We’ll likely never get a clear answer, because a portion of the electorate votes on sentiment or slogans instead of evidence‑based assessment. 2/2
@GaryScotianNS The Libs have governed for the past 11 yrs, and the economic pressures we’re facing have all emerged during that period. If you look at the yrs before their tenure, indicators like crime, fed debt, and immigration levels were stable or trending downward. Would Pierre do better1/2
@nnncurtis@KelliDPowers Of course he’s not going to unwind a decade-plus of mismanagement overnight. Reversing twelve years of institutional drift, incompetence, and outright corruption isn’t a weekend project. Rome wasn’t built in a day, and neither is a functional country. The harder lift 1/2