How should the Christian church respond to Lockdowns, unethical practices and medical tyranny?
Quite simply, we begin with the foundation of God's word; then,
Astonishing ignorance.
Unlike other fortifications there is no claim to be replacing losses from milling. The dose is far too high for that.
The claim is that it will act as a drug with a medicinal benefit for a tiny number.
What is wrong with you Christopher? Have you actually researched this? The only people who need folate are pregnant women in the first trimester. For everyone else, folic acid, synthetic and not actual folate, can harm many people. There is absolutely no need to waste taxpayer money on an intervention that is not needed by most and may harm. I thought you were all about freedom of choice rather than enforced health interventions?
Government advice said to limit intake to 200mcg a day if you are over 50 years old.
The least you should do is stop taking supplements.
Sign the petition.
Nothing unsafe should be put in our food.
We need to bring a legal case.
The debate will not have a vote (petition debates never do 🙄).
Please help by introducing me to families with either:
a child with leukaemia
or
needing to avoid folic acid for another health reason?
I promise to be sensitive to their situation.
There is no obligation.
Just a quick conversation.
Methyl folate is more expensive
and
more is lost in baking
but the cost of feeding us food
rather than a drug
would be 15-25p per person per year.
(N.B. This is a compromise position)
Sign the petition.
And here is the gov saying that 200 micrograms is max anyone over 50 should eat in a day.
So you can have the marmite, but you can't have the toast with it or any other flour that day!
Sign the petition.
They're forcing EVERYONE to consume folic acid in flour (and flour-based foods) to reduce birth defects by about 200/year.
Glaring issues include :
(1) the NHS warns millions against folic acid.
(2) They claim the levels in flour are safe but there are no long term, large scale studies so they aren't sure.
(3) there's a significant risk of exceeding the Recommended Daily Allowance with cereal/toast for breakfast; sandwich for lunch; and pasty/pie for supper.
(4) Public health is littered with examples of finding out later that something thought tolerably safe initially proved later to be harmful. For example the MHRA takes an average of 11 years to withdraw medicines on safety grounds (ie they approved it as safe but evidence later emerged that harms outweighed benefits).
So why take the risk here? Why not simply target pregnant and soon-to-be pregnant women.
If you share concerns sign the petition to expose the issues in a public debate : https://t.co/BNyGKIwRXq
This is pretty cool.
Marc's theory of vaccine injury has been mapped out with the evidence base behind each point available at the click of a mouse.
He has always been all over the details.
The most dangerous belief is that everything is good.
People are inherently good.
Policies are inherently good.
Desire is inherently good.
Why is it so common despite all the bad things resulting from human inaction?
It is 100%.
100% of humans cannot process folic acid efficiently.
The backlog of unmetabolised folic acid happens in ALL of us.
DHFR is 1300 x less efficient at handling folic acid than folate.
MTHFR is a secondary problem compared to that.
SIGN 🧵