Heat Blast

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@Putinsucks60 @Shellz_80 @NOELreports You never heard of vietnam War? How painful it was? Yet the army kept fighting to stop the communist. See the results.The US did far worse than anything.Modern warfare, see iran War, what US did, UN ignored it. Like Dems ignored and don't care about the past history, same as Maga

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@Putinsucks60 @NOELreports Instead of spending that money, you could have saved that money to yourself for important purposes rather than donating to the people. Because you don't know where the money is going.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@Putinsucks60 @NtsalubaColbert @NOELreports Humanity is a joke and arrogant to itself, no matter which side you are. There is no solution to stop the war. Instead, they just want to increase the war and destroy the important resources that will be useful for the future. Now? See how much it got wasted.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@SK1Nz4SK1NZ @hallitonjake @Robbieedjs @teparadox253A @Sayitpop Who's gonna be a good person when your mind is filled with delulu and fantasy.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@NeighborThrax @HeatB68424 @Willy06349634 @Volke__ Nice move. Direct block. Svenne Neger.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@sam05101958 @Osinttechnical Lol, what? US is having a big loss right now.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC You're repeating “you failed” isn’t proof. It’s what people say when they’ve run out of substance. If your case were strong, you’d demonstrate it. Instead, you posture. Then you blocked him to avoid further conversation.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC You're pointing out the inconsistency explicitly. Vague claims of “failure” aren’t arguments. You’re critiquing a contradiction you haven’t articulated. Until you do, there’s nothing to respond to. You’re asserting an error without proof. That’s not analysis — it’s assertion.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC Even though he used it, at least he got a point, whereas you blocked him from further conversation. That's a loser move, right there. You substituted evidence with insinuation and ended the conversation to protect it. That tells everyone what they need to know.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC You keep repeating “5x” without citing methodology, timeframe, or source. A number without context isn’t evidence. Anecdotes aren’t proof — but neither is an uncited statistic. Victimization rate≠ perpetration rate. If you’re making a policy claim, show evidence — not a headline

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @Ramdom28848 Your consistency is the test. You failed it. Then you’ve substituted “prejudice” for proof. Provide an argument, not a reaction. Then you replaced the argument with a label. That’s not evidence.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @RussellTai24291 @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC You either prove the categories are materially different in principle, or accept that your standard is selective. If the analogy fails, explain precisely why. “Bigot” is not an argument.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @RussellTai24291 @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC If the analogy fails, explain why. Simply calling it “bigotry” isn’t an argument. You’re avoiding the reasoning by attacking the comparison. Refute the logic. Either demonstrate the flaw in the analogy, or stop pretending it’s a deflection.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @RussellTai24291 @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC Quote the claim you’re attacking. Otherwise, you’re debating a strawman. You have already lost the argument.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC If the dataset can’t confirm identity consistently, your ratio is mathematically fragile. That's what shows it, because you're already out of it.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC Citation, dataset, methodology. Otherwise, the numbers are void. Then provide a verifiable source for those figures. These are unsupported statistics, which are discarded. No peer-reviewed source, no valid claim.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@RussellTai24291 @jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC Fully agree with your point.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC “Less likely” according to which dataset? Cite the source and methodology.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@Helldrive289298 @jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC Yeah, I saw everything he is a loser and a real sarcastic person. Who lost the conversation like a loser? More like he lost himself. Most of the points are repeating.

[Heat Blast @HeatB45409]

@RussellTai24291 @jasonrope @Ramdom28848 @Marzipan1356921 @AjaTheEmpress @LBC Not what is happening, he already lost the point.