Read Between Lines

Pro-Peace. Pro-PH. Anti-Warmongers, Anti-Propagandists. Reading between lines to uncover truth muddled in broken narratives of political propagandists.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

Truth-seeking is like sifting a speck of gold from a pile of mud.

You need to exert a lot of effort to read anything and everything to sift the truth from a thousand lies.

- Read Between Lines

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet They were just debating not yet voting.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@News5PH Cayetano is not acting weird. He is upholding the constituion. He is a lawyer/senator. Ping is not.

[Tony Leachon MD @DrTonyLeachon]

SUSPENDED Dr. Anthony "Tony" Leachon on Sunday said that he would not be silenced by the disciplinary action imposed against him by the Philippine College of Physicians (PCP) as he vowed to continue “telling the truth and fulfilling my responsibilities” in connection with the cases, stemming from the use of anti-dengue vaccine Dengvaxia on schoolchildren, filed before a Quezon City trial court.

“My participation has never been about personalities or politics. It has always been about accountability, transparency, and respect for the families who continue to seek answers,” Leachon, who is a top prosecution witness, told The Manila Times via Viber.

“Recent developments, including the public circulation of a disciplinary decision issued by PCP against me, should not distract us from the central issue: Dengvaxia cases are finally moving forward before the courts after years of delay,” said Leachon, a known public health advocate and a former Health Department official.

He believed that Dr. Kenneth Go, a former Health undersecretary, was not solely responsible for the filing of ethics complaints against him before the PCP.

“This is not accurate. Dr. Go served as spokesperson for the complainants, who also included other respondents in the pending Dengvaxia cases, among them (Iloilo) Rep. Janette Garin and former Department of Health officials facing criminal and civil cases arising from the Dengvaxia controversy,” he said.

https://t.co/qUp6Wvt4Sp

Tony Leachon

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet Avelino did not change senate leadership. So, it doesn't apply in this case.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet Makulit ka na lang. Hindi na logical. Ayusin mo argument mo dahil sinagot ko na yan.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet Kung 22 nga. Kaso hindi. 24 pa rin.

Paano maging 22 ang Senado?

If 2 of them:

A.) Die,
B.) Resign, are
C.) Expelled
D.) Impeached or
E.) Convicted

Any of this happen? No. So 24 is still 24. You cannot bend the law expressly stated in the Constitution.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet Ano nga sabi ni Tulfo at ni Boying?

Bend the law?

Kawawang Pilipinas.

Hindi na rule of law ang umiiral kundi rule of maleta na.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet It counts. But it doesn't matter.

It counts. Cause they use their influence.

But if it is wrong, it doesn't matter.

They're using their influence to sway politics in their favor. Which is sad. Cause they swore an oath to uphold the constitution. But now, they are twisting it.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet So just because you cannot compel them to attend, you will violate na lang the constitution? Ganon?

Kaya nga compel. That is the limit.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet Hindi porquet former SC Justice ang nagsalita maniniwala ka na lang.

Be critical also. Dahil may mga former justices na naging politician na rin.

Like may former SC Justice nga na implicated sa flood control corruption.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet Balikan mo 16(2). Bakit nakalagay doon na "they can compel the attendance of absent members" para que? Kasi decisions, even on regular business is not valid w/o a quorum due to the absent members. Kaya i-compel pa rin nila magattend. That is the limit of what they can do, compel

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet Ganito para mas maliwanag.

Kunwari Chairman of the Board ka. Lima kayong Board.

Ang quorum ng lima ay 3.

Nasa abroad ka, nagpatawag ng meeting yung 2. Dahil inis sila sa yo at gusto ka nilang alisin.

Can they do it with just the 2 of them? Hindi di ba?

Simple logic lang.

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet You rest your case because you are inventing jurisprudence where there is none like your precious BBM protectors.

Show us the jurisprudence where 12 senators declared the positions of Senate President and SP Pro Tempore vacant.

[BìsCAMmers @DecentralBeing]

Inday Lustay pa rin?

Fake pa rin ang mga sinasabi ng 18 Marines?

[Read Between Lines @Hector_deLector]

@dabigbossmann @inquirerdotnet 12 is not a quorum that can change or remove the senate presidency or president pro tempore. That is reserved to 13 in the constitution.

Your precious BBM protectors violated the constitution they swore an oath to protect.