Llamó “Sleepy Joe” a Biden durante años y utilizó su edad y su estado físico como arma política. Ahora, las cámaras vuelven a captar a Trump durmiéndose en un acto público. Una escena que no es nueva y que se ha repetido en varias ocasiones durante su presidencia. Y ¿ahora qué Donald?
The Mossad’s official English name was apparently “Israeli Secret Intelligence Service.”
Initials: ISIS.
Sometimes history does not need satire.
It just needs the letterhead.
@infolibnews Zionists are done.
The declining US power is dooming its military outpost in Middle East.
Of course, they'll die murdering, as the rabid dogs they are.
CHINESE SCIENTISTS created a new medicine that is being hailed as a breakthrough in the fight against lung cancer, it was revealed this week.
“And the results here, I think, are quite astounding,” said Dr Monty Pal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in a YouTube video review. “What we see here is an improvement in median overall survival.”
Yet the development of the new drug, called ivonescimab in English, is being portrayed as worrying news by politicians and media in the US. Why?
The US elite’s congenital megalomania means it has to be number one in every field. This need triggers extreme paranoia—and means that Chinese lifesaving advances are bad news.
.
NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT
“It’s a war right now with China,” said United States Department of Health and Human Services Chris Klomp at the recent Conservative Political Action Conference.
"We face a national security threat right now...it's not one of missiles and tanks. It's of laboratories and life-saving medications.”
Oh no! Not life-saving medications!
Will the dastardly Chinese stop at nothing?
But it gets worse. If American patients become reliant on the Chinese for drugs, there is a risk of “creating a new Strait of Hormuz”, said former FDA chief Dr. Peter Marks, quoted in the New York Times.
That’s a telling remark. Not only is the paranoia up front and center, but look at the example he chose. The US created an entirely needless problem in Iran, with thousands dead and millions suffering from fuel shortages.
Western political plays have real world consequences for both sides--and innocent parties, too.
.
CHINA SCIENTISTS GET TOP SPOT
The medical issue escalated last week at the annual ASCO global gathering of oncologists (cancer doctors).
The five biggest breakthroughs are given top-of-the-bill presentation slots—and politicians and journalists were shocked when one of them went to Chinese medical scientists who conducted their trials in China.
.
THE ISSUES
Let’s look at the issues, one by one:
Are there serious concerns that the new drug, ivonescimab, doesn’t work or only works on Chinese people?
- No. The drug was created by a Chinese firm called Akeso Biopharma, and it is already used successfully in China. There has since been a global study in the United States, Canada and Europe, too, to ensure diversified data.
Are there worries that China may deny sending this and other drugs to Americans?
- No. Chinese companies keep the rights for their own country and then license the drugs in the US to American firms. Ivonescimab in the US is a product of Summit Therapeutics of Miami.
Is there concern that the data is false?
- No. The Lancet, a medical academic journal, has already printed a study saying that people who got the new drug had a 34 percent lower death rate.
Is the problem that the Chinese copied the drug from the US?
- No. That’s not how science works. Science advances through data-driven breakthroughs, irrespective of where they take place.
So what is the problem?
It’s the usual one: the US needs to dominate everything, whoever gets hurt. In the case of medicines from China, the victims of needless hostility will include US citizens, if drugs are delayed or banned.
.
BUILDING WALLS
President Donald Trump has already signed legislation that prevents US government bodies signing contracts with Chinese biotech firms, however beneficial their products and services may be.
And separately, politicians in Congress are trying to get rules passed that prevent the recognition of data from clinical trials in Mainland China or Hong Kong.
Some US journalists also appear less interested in the scientific breakthroughs than the politics of who is making them. The New York Times report last week on the topic began with these lines:
“For decades, an annual gathering of oncologists has featured drug trials that were run mainly at American and European hospitals.
“But at this year’s meeting, which is being held in Chicago this weekend, the signs are everywhere of China’s ascendance as a powerhouse in drug development — and of the threat that many believe it poses to American biotechnology.”
China’s latest threat: lifesaving medications.
Justo el día que se desangra Wall Street, Trump sale con la maravillosa idea de que el Estado tome parte en empresas de IA. Es un mensaje claro: no teman a la burbuja, que en última instancia socializamos las pérdidas.
Lo de libre mercado es para almas bellas, siempre lo fue.
@VictorGGuerrero@JulianMaciasT Ya solo quedaría meter a nuestras élites en ese refugio, cerrarlo herméticamente y tirar las llaves al mar.
Un problema menos.
Tras el anuncio del fallecimiento por tristeza, con 56 años, de Marjane Satrapi, no puedo evitar pensar en lo que oculta esa frase. Dicen sus amigas que en los últimos tiempos se había abandonado completamente: se había dejado llevar y se encerró en sí misma.
Lo que me recuerda que...
El otro día estuve en la casa de Carmen Martín Gaite, la autora de "Entre visillos". Decía la guía, una amiga de la familia, que cuando se separó, Marta, su hija, tuvo que cuidar de su madre durante una buena temporada; pero no aclaró a qué se refería. Para ilustrar esa época nos enseñaron la foto que acompaña esta entrada, con la hija colocada en la posición que normalmente ocuparía una madre.
Sin embargo, durante la visita no se ocultan los detalles de la muerte de Marta por SIDA y sus problemas con la heroína a principios de los años 80.
Lo que me recuerda que...
Carmen Laforet escribió Nada con 22 años. Es una novela gris sobre una época oscura en una Barcelona triste. Luego prácticamente "desapareció" para la literatura, algo que sigue siendo un misterio para mucha gente.
Su familia suele mencionar las dificultades de la época para las mujeres, las envidias del marido y que se centró en los problemas de la crianza. Entre líneas, no puedes evitar pensar que su obra más conocida dice muchas cosas de ella.
Lo que me recuerda que...
Alguien me bloqueó por aquí por decir que Amalia Avia era una pintora tremendamente depresiva; que, en mi opinión, no pintaba solo el Madrid de su época —que también—, sino más bien un Madrid en el que proyectaba, en parte, su estado de ánimo.
Es decir, que era un realismo con filtro y no exactamente una fotografía del Madrid de la época, como algunos pretenden.
Lo que me recuerda...
La cantidad de eufemismos que seguimos utilizando para ocultar problemas como la depresión, el suicidio, los abusos y las enfermedades mentales en general.
Y que no nos tenemos que fiar tanto de las historias que se cuentan en las familias, porque, por debajo, fluye un río de aguas turbias.