⛨ ESSE SIVE POTENTIA ⛨
✠
⛨ FIERI SIVE POTENTIÆ INCREMENTVM ⛨
✠
⛨ FVLMINESIGNATVS ILLE CHALYBE ENTIVM REXQVE ⛨
✠.
Mine, thus supremely antithetical unto the hitherto merely received
ENS,
TRIAD OF POWER
criterion,
which shall be quoted in mine pre-article.
⛨ ESSE SIVE POTENTIA ⛨
✠
⛨ FIERI SIVE POTENTIÆ INCREMENTVM ⛨
✠
⛨ FVLMINESIGNATVS ILLE CHALYBE ENTIVM REXQVE ⛨
✠.
Mine, thus supremely antithetical unto the hitherto merely received
ENS,
TRIAD OF POWER
criterion,
which shall be quoted in mine pre-article.
Slightly now retouched, conceptually-semiotically, thus. Do ye all have a gander. Thanks.
Alongside thus, mine
⛨ FVLMINESIGNATVS CHALYBE NOMINE ILLE PVRO ⛨,
the latter, the
SOLE true OVERHUMAN,
as set forth, and accordingly demonstrated.
https://t.co/2NgBoiMRAz
Slightly now retouched, conceptually-semiotically, thus. Do ye all have a gander. Thanks.
Alongside thus, mine
⛨ FVLMINESIGNATVS CHALYBE NOMINE ILLE PVRO ⛨,
the latter, the
SOLE true OVERHUMAN,
as set forth, and accordingly demonstrated.
https://t.co/2NgBoiMRAz
DE EXTRAMVNDANO CHALYBE MEO FEVDALI SPECVLOQVE AC REGIS RICARDI
DE IRA.
Within mine, otherwise now,
FEUDAL IRON.
Same criteria thus maintained. The
RETURN-TO POWER
most ontic-selective, inevitably cosmic/cosmological in kind, event, thus behind:
https://t.co/2NgBoiMRAz
DE EXTRAMVNDANO CHALYBE MEO FEVDALI SPECVLOQVE AC REGIS RICARDI
DE IRA.
Within mine, otherwise now,
FEUDAL IRON.
Same criteria thus maintained. The
RETURN-TO POWER
most ontic-selective, inevitably cosmic/cosmological in kind, event, thus behind:
https://t.co/2NgBoiMRAz
The "Umwertung aller Werte"?
Certainly, certainly, no question about it... yet
STILL
within a sheer dreadful, I say,
CONDITION OF IMPOTENCE,
to be found.
Into thus mine
COPERNICAN REVOLUTION,
the
OVER-ENS
thus solely ruling.
#ΛOΓΟΣ
https://t.co/7T84liBThU
The "Umwertung aller Werte"?
Certainly, certainly, no question about it... yet
STILL
within a sheer dreadful, I say,
CONDITION OF IMPOTENCE,
to be found.
Into thus mine
COPERNICAN REVOLUTION,
the
OVER-ENS
thus solely ruling.
#ΛOΓΟΣ
https://t.co/7T84liBThU
That which is distinct from its own quiddity (QVIDDITAS IPSA NOMINE AC VERBO) being able to be both corporeal and incorporeal as well as universal, as in the criterion of the Thing (RES COGITATA) or of the ENS.
In mine next publication, one with mine most distinct
TO ΓE ΦAΣΜΑ.
That which is distinct from its own quiddity (QVIDDITAS IPSA NOMINE AC VERBO) being able to be both corporeal and incorporeal as well as universal, as in the criterion of the Thing (RES COGITATA) or of the ENS.
In mine next publication, one with mine most distinct
TO ΓE ΦAΣΜΑ.
Shall tell a narrative, or rather, a first-person
VISIO ARDENS MEA MAXIME DISTINCTA HOC SPECVLO ITERVM IPSA,
most well-defined, thus nothing left unto the random nor unto the vague, historically, as it is my custom, to flank my new, again most specular in kind,
H EIKΩN.
Shall tell a narrative, or rather, a first-person
VISIO ARDENS MEA MAXIME DISTINCTA HOC SPECVLO ITERVM IPSA,
most well-defined, thus nothing left unto the random nor unto the vague, historically, as it is my custom, to flank my new, again most specular in kind,
H EIKΩN.
A NEW FAITH? As my readers keep emailing me? Many ladies, also? Possibly. Yet this
IPSA NOVA MEA RES IN SPECVLO
in the most rational, and MAGNA CVM MEA IGNOMINA forgotten (with Descartes onwards, NOT with the Socratic-Platonic tradition, as Heidegger believed),
ΛOΓΟΣ
only.
A NEW FAITH? As my readers keep emailing me? Many ladies, also? Possibly. Yet this
IPSA NOVA MEA RES IN SPECVLO
in the most rational, and MAGNA CVM MEA IGNOMINA forgotten (with Descartes onwards, NOT with the Socratic-Platonic tradition, as Heidegger believed),
ΛOΓΟΣ
only.