@rauli_virtanen Taitaa olla kuitenkin lähinnä hyötyä Trumpille, koska Colorado menisi demokraattien ehdokkaalle joka tapauksessa, nyt saa uhriutua ja vaikuttaa syyttömältä, kun juttu etenee korkeimpaan oikeuteen, jossa se hylätään.
@sophyphilia Wouldn't one need to already have an opinion on what good is to evaluate whether God is good or not? What is this moral value and how do we avoid it being subjective?
@TSTFinland Hyvä esimerkki haitoista oli listassa, jossa kerrottiin kokemuksia. Asiakas kertoo epätoivoisena kuinka paha ottaa hänestä vallan ja ei tiedä mitä tulee tapahtumaan. Mielenterveyspalvelujen sijaan diakoni ohjaa rukoilemaan ja Raamatun pariin. Lopulta henkilö murhaa jonkun.
@regnd He or you don't have to explain, but don't be surprised if I judge someone who kills children without a real good reasoning. I have looked, but I haven't found a reason. You can now choose to call me a liar or help me by telling what is the justification you found in the bible.
@regnd@BSWthepodcast@DrFrankTurek If an action goes against goals of my morality, I consider it bad. There is no contradiction there. You would need to prove that he exists and that I should care what he thinks is moral. Are you going to give a reason for killing children or is just ok because God did it?
@regnd@BSWthepodcast@DrFrankTurek I just do. Don't you? The goal of morality is subjective. Setting a standard is also subjective. I could choose Voldemort and, voilà!, whatever he does is now the peak of morality. Can you tell me the situation that excuses the fate of David and Bathsheba's child?
@regnd@BSWthepodcast@DrFrankTurek So, are you able to say that character of god depicted in bible is evil? He is claimed to have killed bunch of children. I, like most of humans, care about wellbeing of other sentient creatures and use that as basis.
@regnd@BSWthepodcast@DrFrankTurek Voldemort depicted in Harry Potter books is evil but also does not exist in reality. Those attributes are not mutually exclusive.
@VirtaWeeruska@kasvismafioso@Lfromthenorth Jos on puhe kuudennesta käskystä, "älä tapa" on väärä käännös. Oikea käännös olisi "älä murhaa". Hepreasta löytyy omansa erillinen sana tappamiselle. Olisihan se ihan typerää antaa käsky olla tappamatta, mutta muissa kohdissa käskeä tappamaan erinäisistä syistä.
@thedialogueFM@waldenpod Unless good isn't tied to God. Then the perspective would matter. If we are too limited to see the difference between a good and an evil act, I don't see how we could tell a good god from an evil one. 2/2
@thedialogueFM@waldenpod Interesting stuff. I suppose one could say good is whatever God does. If we do that, why bother talking about limited perspectives? Whatever God did, it's good because we defined it so. 1/2
@JuhaniVallikari@SinikkaHeinonen Onko esim keskitysleirien uhrien kärsimys iankaikkisesta mittakaavassa vain lellityn teinin "vastoinkäymisiä"? Tämä veisi pohjan minkään maanpäällisen teon tuomitsemiselta.
@latemantyla Onhan se. Aktivistin homma ei vaikuta olevan helppoa yleensäkään, joten nostan hattua yritykselle parantaa asenteita kristillisessä yhteisössä.