Meg🧣

//she/her 25 Black Lives Matter //

[Meg🧣 @HiddlesMess]

"There's nothing like a mad woman
What a shame she went mad
No one likes a mad woman..."

YOU MADE HER LIKE THAT

#WyrokNaKobiety #StrajkKobiet #zakazaborcji #KobietaDecyduje

[:L @mikechosis]

immortality truly has cradled him he will be forever known loved and missed :’) despite being gone for 17 years & the decades they’ve spent trying to smear & erase his legacy he repeatedly sets more records and his legacy is forever cemented he IS magic!!!

[pami 🍎 @michaelsthriler]

Immortality will cradle you gently in its arms, and you will be forever known

[Pop Base @PopBase]

‘MICHAEL’ becomes the first biopic in history to gross $1 BILLION at the global box office.

[Decked Out Media 🍿 @deckedoutmag]

The #MichaelMovie has officially crossed $1 billion at the global box office, making it the first and only biographical film to ever do so. 🍿

[𝓥𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪💫 | MJ fan @iamveronica777]

MJ was supposed to make his comeback on July 13th. Today his biopic reached $1 BILLION. The universe found a way to keep his promise when he said, “See you in July” 🤍

[Global Box Office @GlobalBoxOffice]

MICHAEL has officially become the highest-grossing biopic of all time at the global box office this Sunday.

The King of Pop surpassed Christopher Nolan’s OPPENHEIMER ($975M) .

[ally 𝜗𝜚 ࣪˖ ִ𐙚 @ladybirdmp4]

this is genuinely the most perfect thing anyone has said to him

[Meg🧣 @HiddlesMess]

Miss you Applehead… 17 years without you and the wound still feels fresh.

Thank you for All the L.O.V.E. joy and kindness you brought to the world. I can never thank you enough for raising me. I hope to make you proud one day.

Hope Heaven is all what you deserved, Angelface♥️

[SIR1⭐️ @sa10nee]

Macaulay Culkin, a close friend of Michael Jackson and the star of the Home Alone movies revealed in a recent interview how an undisclosed group of people allegedly connected to Sony Music approached him and his mother in 1993 and offered them a large sum of money to publicly claim that he had been s£xually abused by Michael Jackson, who was facing ch!ld mol£station allegations at the time.

“I vividly remember a night in 1993 when a group of people came to our home claiming they were connected to Sony Music. I don’t really want to mention names, but they said they were part of the company. They offered me and my mom a large amount of money around a million dollars or more to testify against Michael Jackson and claim that he had s£xually abused me during my time at the Neverland Ranch. They told me it was the right thing to do because they believed Michael Jackson was a dangerous person. I immediately told them no! because why would they want me to do something like that to a man who was my best friend at the time and had never harmed me? My mom actually told me to consider accepting the offer because she thought it could be beneficial for us, and she wondered if Michael might have done something without me knowing. But even though I was young at the time, I completely rejected the offer, and they eventually left.”

He also added that, looking back on the situation, he believes he understands why those allegations were being made against Michael Jackson. He claimed it was connected to a dispute involving Sony Music and Michael Jackson’s ownership stake, including his interest in the Beatles catalog. He alleged that the accusations were part of an effort to pressure Jackson into giving up his assets.

[Film Updates @FilmUpdates]

‘MICHAEL’ is officially the biggest music biopic of all-time.

[MJ Friends | Fan Account @mjfriends_]

Every time a Michael Jackson hater runs out of legal arguments regarding his 2005 acquittal, they rush to the internet and pull out the same sensationalist story: “The Neverland police reports and the disturbing books.” They act as if it's some newly discovered bombshell, but the truth is simple: all of this was debated, scrutinized, and ultimately rejected by the jury in court more than 20 years ago.

Let me explain once and for all what the FBI and the American justice system actually concluded about the books found in Michael's room.
Michael never even touched those books (zero fingerprints). Let's start with the fact that immediately destroys this narrative. Forensic investigators examined the books seized from Neverland and found that Michael Jackson's fingerprints were not present on the interior pages of any of them. Michael owned a massive library of more than 10,000 books. As he explained in interviews, he received thousands of gifts, packages, photography books, and publications from fans, photographers, and publishers around the world. Many of those items went straight onto shelves without him ever opening them or even knowing exactly what they contained. The prosecution tried to blame a man for books he may never have even flipped through.
They were 100% legal art books. The titles seized by investigators, including works associated with artists such as James Bidgood, Simen Johan, and Kelly Klein, were collections of photography, naturist imagery, and adult artistic content. They were legally published, available through mainstream retailers, and cataloged by major libraries. None of them met the legal definition of child pornography. If there had been even the slightest indication of illegal content, Michael would have been charged with possessing prohibited material back in either 1993 or 2003. That never happened.

Even the prosecutor admitted it. Ron Zonen, one of the prosecutors who worked tirelessly to secure a conviction in 2005, later acknowledged a key fact: “There was no child pornography. There were no videos involving children.” The prosecution attempted to use the books as part of a broader theory of grooming, hoping to create a particular impression in the minds of jurors. But speculation is not evidence, and the strategy ultimately failed.

In 2016, tabloids tried to revive the story. Websites such as Radar Online republished old allegations and claimed to reveal shocking new evidence. Critics pointed out serious issues with those reports, including allegations that certain images had been digitally altered or presented in a misleading way. Some observers also noted the inclusion of material from works published years after the original Neverland searches, raising questions about the accuracy and reliability of the reports. The controversy only reinforced how heavily disputed those claims were.
The FBI found nothing illegal. Federal authorities spent years examining allegations involving Michael Jackson. Investigators reviewed computers, hard drives, documents, and other materials seized from Neverland. After all of that scrutiny, no child pornography charges resulted from those investigations. Reports indicated that investigators found adult heterosexual pornography, which is completely legal for an adult to possess. Michael Jackson was an adult man, and possessing legal adult pornography is not a crime anywhere in the United States. The jury already saw all of this. During the 2005 trial, jurors reviewed the books, heard the testimony, examined the evidence, and listened to the prosecution's theories. They were not kept in the dark. They saw the very material that critics continue to cite today. After months of testimony and deliberation, the result was clear Michael Jackson was found not guilty on all 14 counts.
Bringing up these books today as if they are some newly discovered smoking gun does not demonstrate a deep understanding of the case.

[retrobanos @sillyliltornado]

Aaand this is why I don't trust the sudden onset of the idea that "college is a scam". It's not a coincidence that higher education has started losing its value in society's eyes now that women outperform men.

[Meg🧣 @HiddlesMess]

Chodzi o kolor. Cry my eyes *violet*, jej oczy w golden era Hollywood były uznawane za wyjątkowe właśnie ze względu na kolor

[inka @swiftflake]

słucham sobie tego i się zastanawiam, co ma w sumie Elizabeth Taylor do tego wszystkiego XDDDD
https://t.co/8UX3v8DPSC

[Meg🧣 @HiddlesMess]

@omiomomi Hej, aktualne?

[Stella @sappyvibes]

A man raped a squirrel to death and the males think it’s funny. Degenerate lots.

[rzep @rzep8]

Święta, święta i po świętach. A to oznacza, że nadeszło WOŚP. A to natomiast oznacza, że zaczynają się ataki - między innymi ten sugerujący, że pieniądze zebrane przez WOŚP nie mają żadnego znaczenia w kontekście budżetu NFZ. 🧵

[Rok temu napisałem ten wątek i udało się dotrzeć do sporej ilości osób. W związku z kolejnym finałem, chciałbym go przypomnieć (z lekkim uaktualnieniem), bo widzę, że niestety podobna narracja jest ciągle utrzymywana.]

Po latach prób obrzydzenia samej osoby Owsiaka i sugerowania (nieskutecznie) jakichś przewałów w fundacji w ostatnich latach pojawiła się nowa narracja.

Atakuje ona WOŚP od drugiej strony i ma na celu sugerowanie, że zbiórka nie ma żadnego znaczenia w kontekście naszej Służby Zdrowia bo zbiera grosze w porównaniu do budzetu NFZ.

W końcu WOŚP zbiera ledwo paręset milionów, a roczny budżet NFZ to ponad 150 miliardów, więc o czym w ogóle tu rozmawiać!

Co ciekawe ta forma ataku ma miejsce zarówno z prawej strony, która nienawidzi Owsiaka za jego ideologię ("róbta co chceta") i "deprawujący młodzież" Woodstock jak i z lewej strony, która chyba próbuje udowodnić, że takie PRYWATNE akcje są niczym w porównaniu do potęgi państwa i to "libkowy" wymysł.

Ten sposób argumentacji pokazuje niezrozumienie jak działa, jak jest zorganizowana i jak jest finansowana Służba Zdrowia w Polsce. Więc wyjaśnijmy po krótce jak to wygląda. Przecież skoro budżet NFZ to setki miliardów to jaki problem kupić sprzęt?!

[𝓜 @nieetyczne]

z racji iż zbliżają się wybory - w których będę uczestniczyć jako wyborca i jako członek komitetu, informacja brzmi:
JEŚLI ODMAWIACIE PRZYJĘCIA KARTY REFERENDALNEJ, DO SEJMU LUB DO SENATU, MÓWICIE TO W MOMENCIE PODANIA DOWODU OSOBIE Z KOMISJI I PROSICIE O ODNOTOWANIE PROŚBY‼️