@JustASportGuy@MarySpr61354476 “Woe is me!?” What on earth!?
Where do you get that from Shough!?
You made a baseless tweet and you’ve spent a lot of effort running around trying to make it make sense.
It’d be a lot easier just to say, “Yeah…all y’all are right…that was just me being petty.”
@YungPhil0sopher@Dubswrld30@BleacherReport He doesn’t like the #WNBA either. His own posts are like 1 million to zero in favor of the NBA. Wonder why? Hard core virtue signaling there. Hilarious.
@MataGooner @AJ_DonWilliams Could also ask who made the decision to go for it on 4th down from your own 30 when you’re winning the game and have an incredible punter on your team.
@ClayPottorff@NFHS_Org As far as I’m aware, every other league that plays four periods rather than two halves (NCAAW, NBA, FIBA) all do what the “new” rule for the NFHS is. So, to this point, American high school basketball has been the outlier.
@CoachFocke@NFHS_Org Well 1 & 1 does result in more box-outs, but the idea thet’s leading to injury is ludicrous. I’m not necessarily in favor of the change, but I don’t hate it either. I’m *guessing* this is an effort to conform to international standards, because the “rough play” bit is nonsense.
@CoachFocke@NFHS_Org There are a lot of really dumb reasons in these comments for opposing this rule change. Rewarding poor free throw shooting teams is not one of them. That’s definitely a big element of this. Also will let trap & slap teams play very aggressively.
@CecilSmith24@NFHS_Org Much of a basketball even beyond the pros is played this way, but I do agree it is the biggest rule change in high school basketball that I can think of since the three-point line.
@Nick_Voss14@NFHS_Org #1 above is an untenable rule. It gives an offensive player the freedom to obliterate a stationary “secondary” defender without having committed a foul. Additionally, in many scenarios, it is an impossibility to determine who is the “primary” defender.