Hiring turned into two sides gaming each other.
Candidates stuff résumés with keywords they can't back up. Employers run them through black boxes that reject people no one can explain.
Both sides lose. It doesn't have to be this adversarial.
The worst thing an AI résumé tool can do is make you look better than you are. Every skill it adds that you don't have is an interview question you can't answer. The rejection doesn't disappear. It moves one round later, where it costs you more.
Reading a practice question off a screen and typing back an answer never feels like an interview. So we rebuilt interview prep as an actual spoken conversation with an AI interviewer, grounded in your real resume and the job you're prepping for. Free to try: https://t.co/r1sru4DLH9
Resume Genius surveyed 1,500 hiring managers: 81% have spotted AI in a candidate's application, 82% say it worries them. Meanwhile 58% of those same managers use AI themselves to screen resumes. Same tool. Only one side gets flagged for using it.
@CorovanMoves Field supervisor roles are always tough to hire for since so much of it comes down to judgement you can't see on a resume. Hope you find someone solid.
In 2019, 73% of employers screened entry-level candidates by GPA. This year it's 42%, still falling. 70% of employers now use skills-based hiring instead, most heavily in screening and interviews. The pedigree filter is fading. What you can actually do is what's being asked now.
Robert Half surveyed 2,000+ hiring managers. 67% say AI-generated applications have slowed hiring, some by two weeks or more. The fix wasn't fewer requirements, it was more steps: 42% review longer, 38% added extra interviews. The shortcut made the process slower for everyone.
Coinbase gets 1.5 million applications a year. Since last August, an AI interviewer has run the first screen for every role below director, about 15 minutes each. Over 240 hires have come through it. 85% of candidates called it clear, not cold.
PwC analyzed over a billion job postings across 27 countries. Entry-level jobs did not disappear, they got harder to qualify for. In the most AI-exposed fields, they now require leadership and judgment seven times more often than before. The bar moved, not you.
Most interview prep is rehearsing answers to questions you might not get. Better use of the hour: reread the posting, pick the two requirements you feel least sure about, and prep one real example for each. If nothing comes to mind, better to know now than in the room.
A new survey of 1,000+ job seekers found 77% worry their resume gets filtered out before a human ever sees it. Their response: pad it. Nearly half now run longer than one page. But only 6% think hiring managers actually read a resume thoroughly once it lands.
@AdviseUrCareer That distinction says a lot. A resume can be strong and still leave the why completely blank. Naming the actual thing that pulled you toward this specific role does more than another paragraph of duties ever could.
@ClamTheAlmighty Getting ghosted after just scheduling and then again after the actual interview is a special kind of frustrating. Neither one says anything about you. Hang in there, the right one will actually follow through.
@lilplatanofrito Three rounds in is far enough that it was genuinely close. Getting that far and still hearing no doesn't erase how qualified you actually are, it just means someone else's timing lined up better.
The best way to search for a job is to find people you want to work with, and be good enough for these people to want to work with you.
This is much better than trying to find The Project, or The Company. They are made of people, and you want to find and be around the right ones.
A new survey of 100+ hiring professionals found only 37% still trust resume credentials as a reliable signal of talent, and 41% are moving away from resume-first hiring entirely. The reason cited most: AI made it too easy to write a resume that sounds right without being true.
@michaelaubry Fifteen years, an IPO exit, and a company you built to $2m, and the funnel can't even send a form rejection back. That's not a signal about you. It's what happens when volume replaces reading on the other end. Hope the right one actually reads it.
Most cover letters either restate the resume or fake enthusiasm nobody buys. There's a better way. Read the job post, pick the two requirements you're strongest on, and give one real example for each. Skip the rest. Two honest examples beat a page of generic passion.
@AskMichaelTaiwo Depends whether the AI-assisted one can explain the reasoning behind their output or just hand you the output. If they can walk you through it, that's real signal. If not, ten years of judgment still wins even at half the speed.