Did you know this picture of infinity?
When you know or assume that something exists, but you ignore it, the count becomes 0
But, when you don't even "think" about counting something, it isn't different from the infinite universe. Thus the count becomes ∞
#sankhyagyan
Physics require systems to exist. All systems are formed from the infinite universe ∞
Physics with universe as the only system:
∞
Physics when systems are made:
∞..1', 0, 1, 2, 3...∞
(Where 1' is the principle count that makes sure that the thing we are counting exists)
Being one with something doesn't give you a membership.
Being one with something actually "make" you that "something". Again, doesn't necessarily mean the ownership.
Like a drop of water in the ocean isn't different from the ocean. Infact, it is the ocean.
1 is nothing in front of ∞
But since both being the packets of reality, I don't necessarily see 1 as inferior and ∞ as the superior.
Any packet of reality can be treated as the entire universe. And I respect that.
The world when you are asleep:
∞
The world when you wake up:
∞..1', 0, 1, 2, 3...∞
(Where 1' is the principle count that gives anything we think exists, a seperate existence from the infinite universe.)
#existence
The stuff I am working on right now (Sankhya Gyan) makes one question if physics is itself the study of reality in the complete sense?
Sankhya Gyan is the knowledge of making the systems. Physics is just another "system" created with sankhya gyan (Knowingly or Unknowingly).
What we count when we don't think about counting:
∞
What we count when we think about counting:
∞..1', 0, 1, 2, 3...∞
(Where 1' is the principle count which does the work of assuming that something that "we wanna count" exists apart from the infinite universe).
When we don't think about counting something, we count the infinity.
When we think about count something, we count the finite. But there always be something that we are not thinking about counting. Thus we keep counting the infinite (with finite in hands).
We ask "How large is the entire universe?" as if we are gonna stop asking what's beyond the end point if there exists any.
Since the day we born, we have been making finite and infinite systems. Systems that we "think" about counting are finite. And rest, the infinite universe.
Finite is "nothing" infront of infinite. But finite is a system. And the infinite universe is also a system. Both are the packets of reality. And any packet of reality can be treated as the entire universe.
So, is true reality finite or infinite?
#existence
99% of speed of light is a myth. The universe allows no percentage of this speed to be acquired. Like no number is any percentage of the infinity. On the same hand the same number (299 792 458 m/s) is finite in case of E = MC².
The Finite and Infinite dilemma.
Why the number 299 792 458 m/s (The speed of light) looks finite? It's infinite if chased but finite in case of (E=MC²). It has properties of infinite, but on the same hand its effects are finite. Is it finite or infinite? Or this mere dilemma directs us to the "Third Option"?
Why there exists something rather than nothing?
Just because the way we "count".
How we think we count: 0,1,2,3...n
How we actually count: 1,0,1,2,3...n
First we "count" that something exists (The Principle Count) and then set the dial to zero and then begin counting again.
Systems are the packets of reality.
From the packets of reality perspective, an apple and the infinite universe (which is a system) are indifferent by nature.
And now I see that any given finite number "n" and infinity are indifferent by nature.
Imagine the universe where there exists only one photon. And nothing else. Now define "energy" there.
"The ability of a system to perform some positive work"
Work on what!?
In such a universe, can we even call photon a packet of energy?
Better call it a packet of reality.
Matter exists as a wave, matter exists as a particle. Observer collapses the wave function.
But, what creates the matter itself is the act of counting it as "some existing system". Like a packet of reality.
And who creates packets of reality?
It's the one who "counts"!
All the systems from very base are just the packets of reality. After that energy, because energy needs pre-existing systems to define itself (ability of a system to....). So, all the systems are just packets of reality and the one who makes the packets is the one who "counts".