UTOPÍA HONDUREÑA
Capítulo 1: Se permitió que una IA ejecutara las ideas que tienen los políticos mientras están en la oposición y que jamás cumplirán cuando lleguen al poder.
Tampoco rebajemos el trabajo humano. No lo hizo en minutos, fue una semana con 1 equipo humano enfocado, con 10k agentes que gastaron alrededor de $40 millones y supuestamente tuvieron acceso a los datos de los investigadores.
Me partió el alma el investigador matemático que pasó siete años tratando de resolver un enigma bastante complejo en el campo y que no había sido resuelto por ningún humano y la IA lo resolvió en unos minutos. 🤦🏼♀️
@Nindyo_16@CEOjamelgologia Una realidad terrible en la que vivimos, tipos como el que comenta son un cáncer en la sociedad. No es posible que se queje de los influencers mientras que los problemas que debe resolver el gobierno, en la mayoría de casos, con el personal esencial de su país.
@vinzer72frie@Bonescraft_ Capacidad cognitiva? La mayoría de oficios en el mundo no son indispensables para vivir. Lo paradójico es que si es "lujo" porque la IA centra sus esfuerzos en automatizarla en lugar de hacerlo con otras tareas más críticas para la humanidad.
Y es por esto que usar LLM privado es regalar datos a estas empresas (quizá ninguno de nosotros está resolviendo un problema del Milenio, pero si pasa se los van a robar estos HDP).
We congratulate Levent Alpöge and Tristan Buckmaster on their remarkable mathematical work.
We (the researchers and the agents) did not see any of their work through any means until they released it publicly — in particular, no specific user data was accessed in order to solve this problem.
While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models.
However, our proofs differ significantly and even the precise results proved are different in the Euler case (forced vs. unforced).
I would like to clarify a few things:
1) The screenshot is my reaching out to Levent to coordinate our releases. I hope it’s clear from the message that we came in with the best possible intentions.
2) I never ever asked for Levent to be removed from authorship of his own work (as indicated by my text). I was surprised to learn during the call with Tristan that they had only solved Euler and not Navier-Stokes; after learning this we brainstormed possible paths forward. One option we discussed was that Tristan could be the lead author on a rewrite of OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes proof. It is in that context that I said “it would be simpler if Levent was not an Anthropic employee” because I felt it would be inappropriate for an Anthropic employee to author OpenAI’s work. Importantly it was admitted that internal Anthropic models had been used in their proof of Euler blowup; I therefore felt I could not consider Levent to be an independent academic. Another option I wanted to propose (but got cut short) is to offer access to our internal model so that they could try to finish their proof and bridge the gap between Euler and NS. Again I did not know how to navigate giving access to internal OpenAI IP to an Anthropic employee.
3) To reiterate it plainly: as my text clearly indicates, and as I said during our call, OpenAI's intention was to do everything possible to celebrate their mathematical achievements and the heroic efforts that they made on Euler. In the call I was immediately met with a litany of slander, including direct threats that if we were to announce Navier-Stokes he would immediately go to the press with a barrage of unfounded accusations. I refuted all these accusations but he replied “there is nothing you can do, I simply do not trust you”. I was confused why one would turn an incredible source for celebration (of their achievements!) into such bickering, which is when I said that I did not understand why one would risk their career [over unfounded accusations]. Genuinely, at that moment, I was trying to care for him and do a last ditch attempt to get a chance to give them all the credits that they deserve. I deeply apologize for this extremely poor choice of words, it is the opposite of what I was trying to convey. (I should say that I retracted them on the spot by the way.)
4) Overall, on a personal level, it was incredibly difficult to have these conversations. Levent refused to attend any of the meetings despite my repeated asking. As Sholto Douglas said, there will need to be coordination between Anthropic and OpenAI in the future; I felt I was doing a proxy negotiation with Anthropic while the Anthropic employee refused to directly participate.
«Si bien la Procuraduría General de la República asumió una posición activa frente a los planteamientos de la defensa, el Ministerio Público falló en lo más elemental.
¿Cómo es posible que el principal testigo de la Fiscalía no estuviera disponible cuando fue requerido en el proceso?».
Mensaje de Gabriela Castellanos, directora ejecutiva del CNA.
#ImpunidadEnHonduras
@kain19962711@Lorenhn_ Eso de "dejo meter gente" le quita responsabilidad, el tipo lo permitió, solo falta saber el grado de compromiso de ese supuesto gol que le metieron con esa gente.