@chippedshera @philzabae@Technothepig Technically it is. For context Hitler treated lesbians better that gays (to a certain degree) which basically explains the joke. Techno most likely found this fact while learning about history because he was 17 and decided to tweet this. Not lesphobe
@ShenDoodles@Technothepig Actually there was context. Hitler was known to treat lesbians better (considering he was hitler) and techno was 17 at the time, therefore it was extremely likely that he came across this random fact and made this tweet, with no lesbianphobic intent
@devmax777 @dykes4txt @Technothepig So basically it wasn't even lesbianphobic or whatever, just fucking stans jumping on the band wagon, on top of the fact that he has openly supported minorities rights on his channel, on top of the fact that this was 4 years ago. Basically twittertard snowflake
@devmax777 @dykes4txt @Technothepig Idk how accurate this is but someone in a commentsection of some vid said that this was an actual part of history. It states that Hitler was known to treat lesbian women better that gay men. Because techno was 17 back then it was extremely likely that he learnt this from history
@NairoMK Remember, both sides have not provided conclusive evidence JUST yet, and it seems too early to see who is deliberately lying. And as much as I want to support who the real victim here in this case is and give them a hug, it's best not to do that. So please dont. Thanks. 2/2
@NairoMK Everyone is immediately jumping to the conclusion that Zack was the rapist in this situation, and while the situation nairomk has presented does seem plausible, I think it's best if we, as a cesspool of Twitter, not take any sides for now. 1/2
@nukiruki @IIovebird OK sure, the evidence here kinza adds up, but it's still better to wait for both sides before the Twitter echo chamber decides its final verdict, because this is what happened with slazo, basically
@carsonexee@MorganMooD1@PyropeYT It's also better to not ruin someone's career over said lie. Don't jump to cancel him just because some person said he groomed her, wait for more things to come out, don't be a dumbass
@nukiruki @IIovebird Also any proof? How do we know your not just making this up. Also I'm not saying it can't be him, I'm just saying that it's innocent until proven guilty, so if he is, then sry lovebird, but if he isn't, fuck you
@nukiruki @IIovebird Ah yes, let's use allegations to prove if someone is guilty or not, what a responsible mindset, and also someone deleting their discord? That is EXTREMELY unlikely, no one does that, that means we need to cancel him immediately because of a COINCIDENCE.