Polymarket just launched a taker rebate program. And it's worth understanding.
Here's how it works.
Every time you take a position, you earn Weighted Volume. Your last 30 days of that determines your tier. Seven tiers total — Bronze through Obsidian. The higher your tier, the bigger the rebate you earn back on every trade going forward.
The tiers:
Bronze — $2K in 30-day volume → 3% back
Silver — $20K → 8% back
Gold — $200K → 18% back
Platinum — $1M → 32% back
Diamond — $4M → 44% back
Obsidian — $10M+ → 50% back
Rebates are paid daily in pUSD, straight to your account. First time you hit a new tier you also get a one-time level-up bonus — $10 at Bronze, $25,000 at Obsidian.
One thing worth noting: not all markets are weighted equally. Crypto trades earn 2.3× weighted volume. Politics and Finance earn 1.3×. Geopolitics earns zero — those markets are free to trade but build no tier.
The formula also rewards lower-priced positions. A share bought at 5¢ earns nearly 2× the weighted volume of the same dollar amount at 50¢ — because the upside per share is bigger.
Bottom line: Polymarket is now paying active traders to stay active. The market is paying you to make your calls.
— CI.
Surveillance Video From Karmelo Anthony Stabbing Of Austin Metcalf Has Been Revealed — It Could Totally Shift The Verdict
READ MORE: https://t.co/LzHHH3xUen
CALLED IT. sees Switzerland at 1¢ on @Polymarket to win the World Cup as value.
The Swiss are not going to win the World Cup.
But, a 1% probability presents an incredible opportunity for traders.
Read the full analysis🔽
https://t.co/ya9qKZHn6x
You don't need Switzerland to win the World Cup. You need them to keep being alive for the price to climb.
Here's what the contract realistically does, stage by stage:
Today: 1.1¢
Round of 32: 1.8-2.8¢
Round of 16: 3-6¢
Quarterfinal: 8-18¢
Semifinal: 18-35¢
CALLED IT.'s simulations have Switzerland eliminated:
Round of 16 in 33%
Quarterfinal in 16%
This means, roughly two-thirds of the time, the contract clears the 3–6¢ range before any serious test arrives.
In about half of all runs, it survives into the Quarterfinal pricing band of 8–18¢.
This isn't a guess on who will win the World Cup. This is a trade on an undervalued, stable team that can make a run to the R16 or QF.
So what happens now?
The IEEPA tariff theory is dead, and the government is now unwinding the mess.
CBP has stopped collecting the invalidated IEEPA tariffs and started a refund process for importers who paid them.
That is a massive job. Reports put the total at roughly $166 billion in collected duties across hundreds of thousands of importers and tens of millions of import entries.
The next fight is over who gets paid back, how fast the refunds move, and what happens when businesses already passed some of those costs on to customers.
The administration can still look for other tariff statutes, but those laws come with their own procedures, limits, and litigation risks.
The Court said IEEPA does not mention tariffs or duties, and the government pointed to no statute where Congress used the word “regulate” to authorize taxation.
That mattered because tariffs are a tax on imported goods.
Congress can delegate tariff power to the President, but the Court wanted clear authorization before reading IEEPA as a blank check for tariffs of unlimited scope, amount, and duration.
Here’s the problem the Court focused on:
Congress has written tariff laws before, and those laws usually say so clearly.
Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, for example, allows temporary import surcharges to deal with large and serious balance-of-payments deficits.
But it comes with limits:
• Maximum 15%
• Maximum 150 days
• Specific trade-imbalance purpose
IEEPA had none of that tariff-specific language.
In April, Trump signed an order imposing a baseline 10% tariff on most imports entering the U.S., plus higher rates on dozens of countries.
To do it, the administration relied on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law that gives presidents broad authority during national emergencies.
The argument was basically: Tariffs “regulate imports.” IEEPA allows the President to regulate imports during emergencies. Therefore, the tariffs were legal.
The courts said that interpretation went too far. The key issue was not the policy itself. It was whether the administration used the right legal authority.