Lori LaBree

[Lori LaBree @Hopsgrl]

@Tironianae We’ve been hearing this for 6 years. I’ll believe it when I see it! I can’t get excited about it any more until it happens.

[Lori LaBree @Hopsgrl]

@atensnut It looks about as good as that horrific library.

[Sarah Fields @SarahisCensored]

REMINDER!

Before the libs decide to try and create their own definition of what Juneteenth is, allow me to help you all out with a short history lesson.

It’s the day when black individuals found out that the first Republican President had signed the Emancipation Proclamation freeing them from the physical bondage of the Democrat Party. It was two years later, on July 4th 1867, that 150 of those same Black men met in Houston and established the Republican Party of Texas. The Democrats, in response, established the Ku Klux Klan.

Today, the Democrats are economically enslaving Blacks and have turned inner city communities into modern plantations of welfare and economic dependence.

Juneteenth is a celebration of why the Republican Party was established in 1854, the abolition of slavery. Only a flaming incompetent idiot would give the party of the donkey any credit for Juneteenth.

Hope this helps!

[Lori LaBree @Hopsgrl]

@its_Lexieroy 😂😂😂

[DocumentingLibs @HistorianUSA1]

This woman discovers the ultimate Karen antidote while visiting Texas. Now, she says she never encountered any in the entire state until she got to the leftist conclave of Austin, where she had to endure three separate Karens. What’s her secret?

Fake a French accent and roast her to her face.

‘Are you one of those Karens we’ve seen online? With that haircut? From California?’
Karen shrinks, gets embarrassed, and walks away.

Pro tip: Europeans are ‘more cultured’ so they instantly self-destruct. Austin in shambles 😂🇫🇷

Now, not sure this all went down like she says it did, but who else is trying this next time?

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

There’s something in America called “Disparate impact” and it’s destroying law enforcement

“Disparate impact is the conceit that if there's a standard that Blacks do more poorly at, it's discriminatory”

“I'll give you an example right out of the Biden administration. Maryland State Police hoping to settle a US Justice Department investigation into its alleged racial discrimination by paying almost $3 million.

The Maryland state police wanted to make sure that the state troopers could read at a very basic level, because as a police officer, you're gonna need to write police reports. Black applicants failed the test at higher rates than whites.

The Maryland state troopers didn't intend to exclude Black state troopers. Racism had nothing to do with it. It was a colorblind, neutral test of skills. But because it had a disparate impact on Black applicants and disqualified more Black applicants”

Let me explain this in the most simple terms,

If a neutral (colorblind) test or rule has worse results for Black people than White people, it can be ruled discriminatory. Even if no one was trying to be racist

This is actually racist towards white people

[Ronny Jackson @RonnyJacksonTX]

Talarico thinks we've all forgotten about how he LED a bill in the Texas House to try to kill the oil and gas industry in Texas.

Conveniently, now he's changed his tune.

There's nothing he won't say or do for power. EVERYTHING about that man is a FRAUD!!

[Lori LaBree @Hopsgrl]

@TheMagaHulk We watched the CourtTV broadcast and it was ridiculous! That same commentator kept saying the most idiotic things. All the commentators were very biased. Absolutely no concern for the victim or his family.

[Lori LaBree @Hopsgrl]

@BarackObama Oh shut up!

[Old Salty Marine @BamaSaltyMarine]

HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.

Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.

1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible]

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent]

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following.

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

AND MY FAVORITE:

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments!

The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though.

Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so but it’s worth a try.

How many people can YOU send this to?

[Whiplash437 @MrWhiplash_]

Obama diverted $400 million from Iran's pallets of cash through the Dubai Embassy to Italian operatives and Merrill Lynch in Geneva to fuel the stolen 2020 election, which was exposed, under oath, by Maria Zack.

In return, Leonardo SpA officials used military satellites and CIA tools like Hammer and Scorecard to hack U.S. voting machines, flipping Trump votes to Biden along with other fraudulent methods, machines, mail-in ballots, and remote access.

China coordinated the operation with tech and bribes, the CIA oversaw the stolen 2020 election, and the FBI covered it up, all to install Biden as a puppet to the cabal and foreign powers. This global election fraud cartel is the largest threat to American democracy and the world.

[Sports Patriot @SportsPatriotUS]

I’m going to say this as calmly as possible:

Watching Caitlin Clark in the WNBA has become genuinely hard to stomach.

Not because she struggles sometimes. Not because she makes mistakes. Not because she gets criticized. That comes with being great.

It’s hard to stomach because it has become obvious that the league, the officials, the media, the players, and even her own organization have all decided that the most important thing is not letting Caitlin Clark become too big.

And that is insane.

This league was handed the most marketable, electric, revenue-generating player women’s basketball has ever seen, and instead of building around the moment, too many people seem obsessed with humbling her.

She gets fouled. Held. Hit. Cheap-shotted. Mocked. Targeted. Then when she reacts like a normal competitor, suddenly everyone wants to analyze her attitude.

No.

Her attitude is not the story.

The story is that a generational player is being treated like a problem by the very league she helped drag into mainstream relevance.

This reminds me of the worst kind of youth coach... the one who sees a special player, feels threatened by her talent, and slowly drains the joy out of her in the name of “teaching humility.”

That is what this looks like.

The freedom she played with at Iowa is disappearing. The fire is still there, but the joy looks damaged. The confidence looks weighed down. She looks like someone constantly fighting the refs, opponents, narratives, coaching decisions, jealousy, and a league culture that should be protecting its golden opportunity instead of resenting it.

And let’s be honest: Stephanie White has not helped.

Benching Caitlin Clark randomly when she is controlling the game tempo, or having your best shooter off the floor in critical game ending minutes when a victory is within reach is basketball malpractice. Limiting her rhythm, downplaying her greatness, benching momentum, and treating her like just another piece instead of the engine is absurd.

You do not take a player who changed the economics of your sport and manage her like you’re afraid her greatness might offend the room.

Nike deserves criticism too. Other players get signature shoes rolled out with urgency, while the biggest draw in women’s basketball is somehow still waiting on that signature shoe. That is not confusing. That is revealing.

Fans are not stupid.

They see the fouls.
They see the double standards.
They see the jealousy.
They see the media resentment.
They see the league benefiting from her popularity while refusing to fully embrace her.
And here is the part the WNBA better understand quickly:
People are not tuning in to watch Caitlin Clark be humbled.
They are tuning in to watch Caitlin Clark be great.
If she walked away tomorrow, the fans would follow her. The sponsors would follow her. The energy would follow her. The high salaries and the charter jets would follow her. And the league would be forced to confront the uncomfortable truth it keeps trying to avoid:

Caitlin Clark did not need the WNBA nearly as much as the WNBA needed Caitlin Clark.

At some point, her family, her agent, and her team need to ask a hard question:

How much longer do you let a league profit from her while allowing the culture around her to beat the spirit out of her?

Because from the outside looking in, this does not look like normal adversity anymore. It looks like abuse.

It looks like a league trying to break the very player who made millions of people care.

https://t.co/AAxFrO46Z4

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

Texas Secretary of State's office, under David Whitley, identified 95,000 non-U.S. citizen registered voters, which 58,000 had actually voted in Texas elections, some dating back all the way to 1996.

The Texas SOS was then sued for $450,000 for trying to remove these non-citizens from voter rolls to secure our elections.

These are the groups that sued that are working with Democrats to keep election fraud active. Everyone of these groups need to be investigated for inducing voter/election fraud.

- League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC / Texas LULAC)

- American Civil Liberties Union of Texas (ACLU of Texas) and the National ACLU Voting Rights Project.

- Texas Civil Rights Project.

- Demos.

- Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

- MOVE Texas Civic Fund.

- Jolt Initiative.

- League of Women Voters of Texas.

- NAACP of Texas.

- Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)

These organizations alleged the state's voter list maintenance process was flawed, discriminatory, and violated the Voting Rights Act and Constitution by flagging naturalized U.S. citizens.

The state settled in April 2019 for $450,000. They had to keep the non-citizens on the voter rolls in order to steal the 2020 election. Start investigating these groups.

[Blue Lives Matter @bluelivesmtr]

If the mainstream media were HONEST - this would be the top story everywhere in America.

Here's Stephen Miller, White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor:

“What we’ve found since President Trump took office is that Democrats have set up a system to funnel hundreds of billions — ultimately trillions — of dollars to migrants in our country, effectively with the sole intent of overthrowing the Constitutional Republic of the United States.”

WE are the media now and can no longer rely on legacy news outlets. Get this out there EVERYWHERE!

@StephenM

#thinblueline #Lawenforcement

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

Every country on planet Earth is built on conquest. Every “indigenous” tribe claimed its land by conquest. Every line on the map, across every continent and every ethnic group, was drawn by conquest. Apologizing for this is like apologizing for gravity.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

🤔

[🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 @Real_RobN]

This is:

Stephen Miller, White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Advisor:

@StephenM: “What we’ve found since President Trump took office is that Democrats have set up a system to funnel hundreds of billions — ultimately trillions — of dollars to migrants in our country, effectively with the sole intent of overthrowing the Constitutional Republic of the United States.”

[Lori LaBree @Hopsgrl]

@Shadow007US If only it were true!

[Lori LaBree @Hopsgrl]

@Ikennect Our kids can’t understand why we hate her so much, why we won’t watch anything she’s in. This is a great recap of the exact reason why. She’s a traitor and should have received a traitor’s punishment!

[I am Ken @Ikennect]

Barbara Walters writes:
Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country, but specific men who served and sacrificed during the Vietnam War.
The first part of this is from an F-4E pilot. The pilot's name is Jerry Driscoll, a River Rat. In 1968, the former Commandant of the USAF Survival School was a POW in Ho LoPrison, the "Hanoi Hilton."
Dragged from a stinking cesspit of a cell, cleaned, fed, and dressed in clean PJ's, he was ordered to describe for a visiting American "peace activist" the "lenient and humane treatment" he'd received.
He spat at Ms. Fonda, was clubbed, and was dragged away. During the subsequent beating, he fell forward onto the camp commandant 's feet, which sent that officer berserk.
In 1978, the Air Force Colonel still suffered from double vision (which permanently ended his flying career) from the Commandant's frenzied application of a wooden baton.
From 1963-65, Col. Larry Carrigan was in the 47FW/DO (F-4E's). He spent 6 years in the "Hanoi Hilton". . . The first three of which his family only knew he was "missing in action." His wife lived on faith that he was still alive. His group, too, got the cleaned-up, fed and clothed routine in preparation for a "peace delegation" visit.
They, however, had time and devised a plan to get word to the world that they were alive and still survived. Each man secreted a tiny piece of paper, with his Social Security Number on it, in the palm of his hand. When paraded before Ms. Fonda and a cameraman, she walked the line, shaking each man's hand and asking little encouraging snippets like: "Aren't you sorry you bombed babies?" and "Are you grateful for the humane treatment from your benevolent captors?" Believing this HAD to be an act, they each palmed her their sliver of paper.
She took them all without missing a beat. . . At the end of the line and once the camera stopped rolling, to the shocked disbelief of the POWs, she turned to the officer in charge and handed him all the little pieces of paper...
Three men died from the subsequent beatings. Colonel Carrigan was almost number four but he survived, which is the only reason we know of her actions that day.
I was a civilian economic development adviser in Vietnam, and was captured by the North Vietnamese communists in South Vietnam in 1968, and held prisoner for over 5 years.
I spent 27 months in solitary confinement; one year in a cage in Cambodia; and one year in a 'black box' in Hanoi. My North Vietnamese captors deliberately poisoned and murdered a female missionary, a nurse in a leprosarium in Banme Thuot, South Vietnam, whom I buried in the jungle near the Cambodian border. At one time, I weighed only about 90 lbs. (My normal weight is 170 lbs.)
We were Jane Fonda's "war criminals."
When Jane Fonda was in Hanoi, I was asked by the camp communist political officer if I would be willing to meet with her. I said yes, for I wanted to tell her about the real treatment we POWs received. . . and how different it was from the treatment purported by the North Vietnamese, and parroted by her as "humane and lenient."
Because of this, I spent three days on a rocky floor on my knees, with my arms outstretched with a large steel weight placed on my hands, and beaten with a bamboo cane.
I had the opportunity to meet with Jane Fonda soon after I was released. I asked her if she would be willing to debate me on TV. She never did answer me.
These first-hand experiences do not exemplify someone who should be honored as part of "100 Years of Great Women." Lest we forget. . . "100 Years of Great Women" should never include a traitor whose hands are covered with the blood of so many patriots.
There are few things I have strong visceral reactions to, but Hanoi Jane's participation in blatant treason, is one of them. Please take the time to forward to as many people as you possibly can. It will eventually end up on her computer, and she needs to know that we will never forget. See less