Hoss @HossSwed - Twitter Profile

HossSwed retweeted

5 days ago

Day 38: Still respectfully requesting help from YouTube to get a real person to manually review my channel after being demonetized for “inauthentic content.” @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators My videos are made with my own voice, commentary, reactions, manual editing, recorded gameplay, custom avatars, and personal perspective. I believe this is important context because YouTube’s guidelines describe inauthentic content as content that is mass-produced, repetitive, automated, or minimally transformed. That is not how my videos are made. I do not simply read stories and repost them. I add my thoughts throughout the video, explain my perspective, react to the choices being made, and try to make the content entertaining, thoughtful, and useful for my audience. Viewers frequently comment about my voiceovers and my thoughts, which shows that “me” as the creator is a unique and integral part of the videos. They are not only engaging with the stories. They are engaging with my voice, my commentary, and my personal contribution to the content. Please help me get a manual review for my channel. Channel: https://t.co/KQANnoAbjP

1

103

28

0

2K

HossSwed retweeted

ScalingStories

@ScalingStories1

about 1 month ago

Hello @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @TeamYouTube, I am requesting that a real person or specialist review my channel’s partnership program status after I was recently denied monetization. I was cited for “inauthentic content,” which is described as: “Content that appears mass-produced or repetitive to increase views without adding significant educational or other value.” My content is not mass-produced or repetitive to increase views, and it does add significant commentary, entertainment, and educational value. My videos are voiced by me and manually edited in DaVinci Resolve, which takes me around 5–7 hours a day. The gameplay is also played by me. I also use several custom-drawn avatars to better represent myself during my talking segments throughout my videos, helping me better express the emotions I am feeling and trying to convey to my viewers. The only repetitive elements in my content are my intros and outros, which are allowed under your guidelines. Your guidelines state: “Examples of what is allowed to monetize, including but not limited to: Same intro and outro for your videos, but the bulk of your content is different.” I explained all of this in my appeal video, which was said to be reviewed by a human reviewer. However, the appeal video is unlisted and still shows a view count of 0. Because of this, I do not believe anyone watched my video, yet my appeal was still denied and my content was confirmed as “inauthentic.” I am being denied the chance to reapply to the YouTube Partner Program until July 27, 2026. That is not right or fair to me. I was previously removed from the program on January 27, 2026. During that time, I thoroughly reviewed my own channel and overhauled it, which included changing my format and deleting videos that may not align with the program’s policies. I spent three months, from January 27, 2026, to April 27, 2026, rebuilding my channel. To be denied again for the same policy, “inauthentic content,” after I followed your guidelines and made sure my videos do not violate them, is soul-crushing. I believe my channel was not properly reviewed and may have been evaluated by AI. I am requesting that a real person or specialist speak with me and review my channel, as I am a genuine, passionate content creator who wants to be part of your program. My channel: https://t.co/rb32nUNgtM