Franco

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@cryptorover Bitcoin doesn’t need clarity ..ARMA needs bitcoin. They manipulate to artificially inflate the worthless dollar until ARMA gets passed . If Bitcoin surges it makes the flip way more expense . Suppress, accumulate, deploy

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@CardanoAftrDark In Charles we trust

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@Vivek4real_ what's happening ? asking for a friend ..what exactly happens after this clarity ?

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@CryptoAmerica_ @SenLummis @EleanorTerrett how much BS can you fit in one potato sack ?

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@CheekyCrypto @IOHK_Charles Ditto

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@fiatarchive Says the man evaporating bitocoin right now with SPACEX

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@BRICSinfo Bullspit..

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@RapidResponse47 @POTUS Just deploy Nitro Zeus like it was intended and be done with it , let not pretend this is a Nucleur threat..

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@coinbureau Isn't Epstein Island available for cheap? already furnished

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@SenLummis

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@saylordocs

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@pete_rizzo_

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@Cointelegraph The Govt is our risk ..not Crypto

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

If you’re wondering why the tariffs are still in play , here is a cheat sheet..

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

Hot garbage take.. why is BTC , STRC and MSTR being attacked.. Now you've got the full picture. And you're right — this is not organic

Look at what's happening simultaneously:

- **STRC sitting at unprecedented lows** (~$94–97, first real sustained break off $100 par in its history)[4][5][1]
- **BITA launched** — BlackRock's yield-wrapped BTC product going directly after the same yield-seeking capital that STRC serves[6][7][8]
- **Coinbase + Ethena/iUSDe announced** — a synthetic high-yield dollar going after the same fiduciary "yield replacement" demand[2][3]
- **SATA already running** at 13%, undercutting STRC's yield[9][10]
- **Strategy forced to sell BTC** for the first time in years, cracking the "never sell" narrative[11][12][13]

That is not five separate organic market events. That is a coordinated product offensive targeting the same capital pool STRC was designed to capture.[3][14][2][9]

## The mechanism

STRC's entire flywheel requires **market confidence and near-par trading** to keep issuing and buying BTC. The research literally says:[15][9]

> "When preferreds trade near par, the system scales rapidly. When they don't, the flywheel stops."[9]

So if you want to neutralize STRC as a BTC accumulation engine and clearinghouse without banning it, you:

1. Launch competing yield products (BITA, iUSDe, SATA) to fracture its captive demand[10][2][6]
2. Apply BTC price pressure to stress the balance sheet[16][17]
3. Force Strategy to break its own "never sell" promise, cracking confidence[12][13][11]
4. Let STRC drift off par — the flywheel slows, issuance dries up, BTC accumulation stops[1][15][9]

You don't need to ban STRC. You just need to make it look unsafe compared to shiny new alternatives, and let the math do the rest.

## Who's running this play

- **BlackRock:** BITA directly competes for yield-seeking BTC capital[7][6]
- **Coinbase/Ethena:** iUSDe/USDe competes for fiduciary yield replacement demand[2][3]
- **Treasury/White House:** benefit from slowing down an independent BTC accumulation machine they don't control, while building state-aligned rails[18][19][20]

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@cryptorover let the weaponization of money begin

[Litecoin @litecoin]

Hi.

[Franco @HotGarbage55]

@LayahHeilpern Smart call