Indeed! To conflate a Rasgulla with an Idli is not just a culinary error; it is a profound cosmological misunderstanding.
To begin with, the comparison is practically a biological impossibility. She is comparing chhena (the delicate, squeaky, pristine curd of milk) with a meticulously fermented batter of parboiled rice and black gram (urad dal). Their compositions are from entirely different kingdoms. One is an airy, spongy lattice designed to trap light sugar syrup; the other is a dense, wholesome, steamed matrix of complex carbohydrates and proteins. Their taste, consistency, structural integrity, and existential purpose share absolutely nothing in common.
But more important, her attempt to dismiss the Idli as merely a blank canvas for sugar syrup does a grave disservice to what is arguably one of the greatest engineering marvels of the culinary world.
The Idli is not a mere "bland cake." It is a masterclass in biotechnology. To achieve the perfect Idli is to balance the delicate microflora of wild fermentation over a cold night, resulting in a steamed cloud that is a triumph of gut health, lightness, and nutritional balance. It is a savoury monolith of South Indian culinary genius, perfectly engineered to absorb the sharp tang of a well-spiced sambar or the fiery depth of a molaga-podi (gunpowder) paste infused with cold-pressed sesame oil or nutritious melted ghee.
To suggest an Idli would even consent to being drowned in sugar syrup is to fundamentally misunderstand its dignity.
If this lady finds Rasgullas overrated, argue that on the merits of their sponginess or sweetness. But please, leave the noble, perfectly fermented, steamed majesty of the Idli out of your dessert-table polemics, ma'am!
Last one on this topic, and I have been holding this in myself for a while.
For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt.
The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale.
Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general.
This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less.
We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal.
Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”).
And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility.
Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income.
And then what happens?
The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated.
The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door.
Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark.
& there is a misconception that Gautam Gambhir is a good white ball coach, no he is not!!
- We are doing well in T2OIs not because of Gautam Gambhir but despite of Gautam Gambhir. He is selecting Shubman Gill over Yashasvi Jaiswal in T2OI Squad & dropped Arshdeep Singh for Harshit Rana in many T2OIs.
- In ODIs, we were touring Sri Lanka under his coaching & he made Shreyas Iyer bat at 5/6/7 & KL at 6 & 7 which resulted in 0-3 series loss vs Sri Lanka which didn't happen in 27 years.
- Then just before CT2025 during England series, Shreyas Iyer revealed that I was not supposed to be part of main XI & I got selected into team only because Virat Kohli got injured. Imagine dropping India's best number 4 batter in last 15 years just because you don't like him.
- In Champions Trophy 2025, thankfully Rohit Sharma didn't allow Gambhir's experiments in team & Shreyas batted at his usual number 4 in all games & he won us the tournament as highest run scorer. It was team of Rahul Dravid & Rohit Sharma which won us the CT2025 as said by Rohit himself & not me.
- Then Gambhir & Agarkar sacked Rohit Sharma from captaincy for winning us 2 back to back ICC trophies with 0 losses & went to Australia under captaincy of Shubman Gill. Which resulted in a humiliating ODI series loss.
So, stop thinking that Gautam Gambhir is some great white ball coach. No he isn't, before becoming coach of team India he never coached any professional cricket team. He was mentor in IPL coach were Langer & Chandrakand Pandit. Gambhir should be sacked from tests immediately & from white ball right after T2OI WC if we want to win ODI WC 2027!!
If anyone had followed and paid heed to whatever that Gambhir used to say in commentary box, or what he used to do as LSG coach or KKR mentor, you wouldn’t be surprised at the tactics or lack of smarts. He was always like this. Would contradict himself at all times. LSG in one season had 7-8 players bat at number 3 in one season. He’s the same person who started lobbying for SKY to be in Tests on the basis of white ball, asked Ashwin to bat at number 4.
So this was always coming. People who hype an individual on the basis of results should also look at the processes. You can win when you have enough quality even with wrong tactics. This is what is happening with the white ball team at present.
Always important to back someone who has a sound reasoning than someone who communicates in rhetorics or hyperboles.
the championship trophy doesn't mean SHIT when the man not leading is pulling drives like this, personally i won't remember if any other bum wins this what i will remember though are those generational drives from the greatest of all time to give us the best title chase oat
Dear Cityzens, I want to be honest with you... the reason why I’m leaving is very simple: I still want to play football as often as possible, because that’s what I love the most. I’ll turn 35 soon, but I still feel very fit and I truly believe I can continue to perform at a high level for a Champions League team.
And not just that – I now have the opportunity to join my childhood favourite club, in a country that means so much to me.
Man City want a new beginning after an incredible era - something I can fully understand and respect. I will never, ever forget what this great club has done for me over so many years.
Most of my time here was absolutely fantastic and incredibly successful. The club and the city of Manchester will always hold a very special place in my heart.
I want to thank all my teammates, the chairman, everyone working behind the scenes, every fan – and of course Pep, who made this amazing time possible.
I’m leaving City with great gratitude - Thank you – on behalf of my whole family ���
Not all nation-builders wear a uniform or clear UPSC.
A new wave of young professionals is transforming India’s governance—working with governments, solving real problems & redefining public service.
A must read op-ed by our Founder & CEO, Ankur Bansal: https://t.co/Xb6UsFMzbL